View Full Version : Bigger sump than DT?
Does anybody have a bigger sump than their DT? Or does this kind of defeat the purpose of a nano tank?
I'll be moving soon, and I am considering using a 10g as the DT and a 29 as the sump. (If the landlord has a problem with fish tanks, I'll just say, "look, it's just 10 little gallons!")
Curtis72
07/12/2012, 02:23 PM
I don't see how it defeats the purpose of a nano, Your DT is still nano. Just means your 10 gallon nano will be way more stable and you can have a nice skimmer and will keep sps better.
dixiedog
07/12/2012, 03:56 PM
Does this kind of defeat the purpose of a nano tank?
Absolutely not. Go for it! The bigger the sump the better.
Lionfish666
07/12/2012, 08:20 PM
I'm not sure if it does defeat the purpose of a nano, as the DT is still more convenient for upkeep, cleaning and moving.
The extra water volume offers stability and flexibility, but will make higher % w/c more difficult.
I would go the bigger sump if I was skimming, or for a dsb, but not if I was relying solely on l/r and w/c for filtration.
Dapg8gt
07/12/2012, 08:29 PM
I have a 24 gal cube w/approx 25 gal FuGE/sump. After adding sump it has been a lot more stable temp wise and nems are a lot happier. Also added a bigger skimmer that in itself was worth it in my opinion. I'd say go for it. Plus got all the equip out of the DT so it looks a lot better.
Thanks guys, I have a few perfect rocks, which I would rather keep than filling up my 29 with average rocks. And I like the maintenance of nano tanks, not to mention the cost of lighting is less.
I have a BakPak skimmer I'll be using and will use a large area of the sump for a fuge. Dsb and lr. And since the stand will be big enough to fit the 29g sump, Ill have extra room on top where I may use a 5g or algae or something.
kevantheman35
07/13/2012, 07:58 AM
I have seen a few tanks in person thathad 150g sumps and like a 75g tank. They all looked amazing
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.