PDA

View Full Version : Gfo and diatoms?


QuiGonJay
09/29/2016, 06:42 PM
Could starting to use gfo cause a diatoms bloom? Tank is two years old and I have a persistent bloom that coincided with me removing my tiny refugium in a back chamber of an all in one and replacing it with a gfo reactor. Nitrates haven't changed and I can't think of any other change. It's kind of odd.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

scooter31707
09/30/2016, 09:28 AM
It might be brown cyano. You can run GFO to see how it does. I recommend only starting out with half the dosage that is recommended.

ssick92
09/30/2016, 10:11 AM
Could starting to use gfo cause a diatoms bloom? Tank is two years old and I have a persistent bloom that coincided with me removing my tiny refugium in a back chamber of an all in one and replacing it with a gfo reactor. Nitrates haven't changed and I can't think of any other change. It's kind of odd.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Do you have any pictures? Are you sure it's diatoms and not dinos or cyano?

Just curious, but why'd you get rid of the fuge if everything was working fine for you?

QuiGonJay
09/30/2016, 12:11 PM
It actually wasn't working fine. Had been battling bubble algae and bryopsis (I think) for months. Exhausted all other options so figured gfo reactor would help more than a 7 inch square refugium (it's an all in one tank.)

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

QuiGonJay
09/30/2016, 12:12 PM
Will post photo tonight. Not 100% sure, I guess could be brown cyano, doesn't look like dinos (no strings, etc)

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

QuiGonJay
09/30/2016, 12:14 PM
Scooter, have been doing the gfo for three weeks along with water changes and it is still growing back in about 2 days.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

QuiGonJay
09/30/2016, 05:04 PM
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160930/d9e35542f3dc4ef1d99613abffa35de1.jpg Photo of the gunk.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

nereefpat
09/30/2016, 06:54 PM
I wouldn't think gfo would be the cause. In general, gfo helps combat diatoms, since it removes silicates. Maybe the disturbing of the fuge would be more of a cause.

QuiGonJay
10/01/2016, 06:45 AM
Thanks. I guess like anything in this hobby, I just gotta give it time. . . .

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

nvladik
10/01/2016, 06:55 AM
I actually had reverse, seeing less diatoms after adding GFO.

jason2459
10/01/2016, 07:36 AM
Scooter, have been doing the gfo for three weeks along with water changes and it is still growing back in about 2 days.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
As stated GFO will help remove one of the things that helps diatoms bloom

Your water change and top off water on the other hand could be full of Si increasing their numbers.

JohnnyP_reef
10/01/2016, 12:04 PM
This may seem obvious, but make sure your always using DI water..
Had diatoms for years off and on,
till I started making my own DI water at home, diatoms are now completely gone..



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jlicht15
10/01/2016, 12:07 PM
What is the green coral to the right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jason2459
10/01/2016, 12:34 PM
This may seem obvious, but make sure your always using DI water..
Had diatoms for years off and on,
till I started making my own DI water at home, diatoms are now completely gone..



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even a DI stage near exhaustion or channeling could provide a significant source of silica.

nvladik
10/01/2016, 12:37 PM
What is the green coral to the right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks like GSP to my eye.

Jlicht15
10/01/2016, 01:01 PM
Looks like GSP to my eye.



No the other one on the right


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nvladik
10/01/2016, 01:24 PM
No the other one on the right


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Ohh LOL pictures opened up Zoomed in on the phone, didn't even see that.

QuiGonJay
10/01/2016, 06:24 PM
It's a Caribbean rose coral. Came in on a piece of live rock and has done well. I always use Rodi water, though I buy it from the LFS, so it's possible their filter is old I guess. Would you agree that is diatoms?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

jason2459
10/01/2016, 07:01 PM
Diatoms is a good guess. Getting a sample under a microscope would let you know. Even at 40x you'd see them as they are very distinct.

From my thread
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2567904

Around 40-100x and a good swarm of them
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161002/e4375151b5c2207de658198118ba25b6.jpg

Closer
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161002/9fd826fc14f2623604c4f560f9fd2b22.jpg


Three different kinds
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161002/23b2fa47afba53638a12d673fbecb07b.jpg

Another kind
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161002/760770e154ae9bdb65630f42e03a1aea.jpg


I believe diatoms to be an important type of phytoplankton.

QuiGonJay
10/01/2016, 07:18 PM
Wow. Cool!

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk