PDA

View Full Version : Well Water Chewing through DI Resin


JordanM
04/23/2018, 06:22 AM
The information. ~300tds out of the well, 25tds after RO membrane and 0 TDS after two canisters DI resin. Booster pump is getting pressure to 90PSI measured between membrane and resin.
System is the 150GPD.
Problem: I just replaced the tow stages of DI resin and after only making about 50 gallons mi Resin is already depleted halfway up the first canister. Also noticed it looks like it only used a partial of the first canister and started consuming the second canister as you can see from the pictures. This is older resin in the first that has been regenerated a few times so maybe it has lost its color changing ability and the stuff that did change right at the beginning was the new stuff. What are your thoughts on the rapid consumption? CO2?

cincyjim
04/23/2018, 06:40 AM
No idea actually. My only thought would be to send off a water sample to a water testing company and see what's in the water.

flooddc
04/23/2018, 06:48 AM
I have seen discussions on "de-gas" (spelling?) your water before entering the DI.

mcgyvr
04/23/2018, 07:22 AM
I'd start by investing in a higher rejection RO membrane..
Look into a 97-99%
That will reduce the TDS entering the DI and prolong its life..
Your current rejection rate is not good at all.

You should also check for CO2 as stated..
https://www.bulkreefsupply.com/carbon-dioxide-test-kit-lamotte.html
Or other test kits for it..

ca1ore
04/23/2018, 07:22 AM
My first observation is that 25 after the RO is not that good. Means rejection rate is only at about 92%. It may be that your membrane needs replacing. You can buy 99% rejection rate ones that would lower TDS to 3-4 after the RO section. That will help enormously in extending the life of the DI resin. My system is similar, about 350 raw water, though only 5 after the RO. I also use dual DI canisters, and the first depletes after about 300 gallons.

My second observation is as already noted: CO2. Well water is notoriously high in CO@ which will reduce the life of the DI resin. Degassing the raw water is not a trivial undertaking, so I would go for a better membrane first and then see where you are.

JordanM
04/23/2018, 07:44 AM
The membranes are about 5 years old and the dual 75gpd one from brs that are between 96-99% rejection. After about 18 hours the production is only about 50 gallons so it seems this is really lacking as well.

mcgyvr
04/23/2018, 08:01 AM
The membranes are about 5 years old and the dual 75gpd one from brs that are between 96-99% rejection. After about 18 hours the production is only about 50 gallons so it seems this is really lacking as well.

They are clearly in need of replacement..
Typically membranes last 3-5 years and the rejection rate shows its basically done..

JordanM
04/23/2018, 08:06 AM
Should i also add a flush valve if i replace both the 75gpd membranes? Right now it just has the restrictor. Does the flush valve just replace the restrictor and serve both purposes?
https://www.bulkreefsupply.com/membrane-flush-valve.html

mcgyvr
04/23/2018, 08:37 AM
Flush valves like that have the restrictor built into them so yes you would remove the restrictor you have an replace it with that..

ca1ore
04/23/2018, 09:31 AM
As noted, membrane(s) are shot. That you are not getting the volume you expect either means you have a water pressure problem, the wrong size restrictor or something is clogged. I typically replace the pre-filters annually and the membrane every 3 years, or when the rejection rate gets worse.

Opus123
04/23/2018, 10:39 AM
At your current tds of 25, a DI cartridge will make around 175 gallons of 0 TDS water. If you replace your RO membranes with the 99% rejection rate you should be getting around 3 TDS which should get you around 1475 gallons of 0 TDS water from a DI cartridge. This is assuming you don't have a CO2 problem.

JordanM
04/23/2018, 11:24 AM
Im going to go ahead and order two of the 75gpd membranes and a new flush/restrictor. Im also thinking about changing one of the carbon blocks to another sediment filter and the other carbon block to a silicabuster before going into the dual di canister. This does have a booster pump on it as well so im getting 90psi between the membrane and the resin.

So my layout will be booster pump to 5um sediment filter to 1um sediment filter to dual 75gpd membranes to silicabuster to dual di resin chambers. The waste i will change to a flush valve/ restrictor since it is the same price for just a restrictor anyways.

Are there any other suggestions? When i get home i will test ph and bubble it for awhile and see if the ph changes. How long should i bubble it for before testing again?

alton
04/23/2018, 11:47 AM
From Spectrapure

JordanM
04/23/2018, 11:59 AM
That is interesting. When spectrapure says 99% rejection is that a true number or can there be a range? I know BRS specifies theres will be between 96-99% rejection.

mcgyvr
04/23/2018, 12:34 PM
That is interesting. When spectrapure says 99% rejection is that a true number or can there be a range? .

Typical stabilized conductivity rejection 99%, minimum conductivity rejection 98%.
98-99%

Footnote 1: Permeate flow and conductivity rejection based on 250 ppm, 77°F (25°C) softened water feed, 15% recovery and the specified applied pressure.

JordanM
04/23/2018, 12:49 PM
Typical stabilized conductivity rejection 99%, minimum conductivity rejection 98%.
98-99%

Footnote 1: Permeate flow and conductivity rejection based on 250 ppm, 77°F (25°C) softened water feed, 15% recovery and the specified applied pressure.

So, basically these filters are better than 2% tighter range then the Dow filmtec ones but are double the price.

mcgyvr
04/23/2018, 12:56 PM
So, basically these filters are better than 2% tighter range then the Dow filmtec ones but are double the price.

yep...
Decision is yours.. (and of course minor math looking at potential DI savings with that added cost answers that decision with relative easy)

You may pay twice the membrane price but save 4 times the DI cost over the lifespan of the membrane..

JordanM
04/23/2018, 12:58 PM
yep...
Decision is yours.. (and of course minor math looking at potential DI savings with that added cost answers that decision with relative easy)

You may pay twice the membrane price but save 4 times the DI cost over the lifespan of the membrane..

Are you able to run two of these filters in parallel like the brs 150gpd ones that use two 75gpd membranes?

mcgyvr
04/23/2018, 01:01 PM
Are you able to run two of these filters in parallel like the brs 150gpd ones that use two 75gpd membranes?

They are just like any other membrane.. Just higher rejection rate..

JordanM
04/23/2018, 01:14 PM
So what restrictor would you use for the dual unit since they both connect back into the same waste line and use one restrictor? Would it be safe to go with what BRS does and just use the 150gpd restrictor which is 800mL?

mcgyvr
04/23/2018, 01:18 PM
I "think" you would want the 400mL or 550 one because I believe you have the same as the 150GPD water saver systems.. (likely the 550 due to your higher source TDS)
Note: I said "think" because I'm not sure on that one.. ;)

JordanM
04/23/2018, 01:25 PM
Might be easier to use two restrictors on each and then T them back into together after the restrictors. I know the larger the number the higher the waste ratio and lower tds you will have so if anything I want to go larger since im not paying for the water and it just goes back into the ground after.

JordanM
04/23/2018, 02:33 PM
Ok my ph is around 7.9 and the alkalinity is 300ppm from the Hanna HI755. I was gone for 9 hours to work today and you can see the di resin has been consumed twice as much as it was this morning and looks like it only made less than 1/3 of the barrel so about ~18 gallons of water. Please let me know if it is CO2 i am dealing with or just bad membranes as I want to get some water ASAP as i want to start the cycle on my tank. Still have OTDS coming out but the in is now reading 15 as i look at it but it was reading 30 when i got home.

JordanM
04/23/2018, 02:36 PM
Forgot the pictures.

JordanM
04/23/2018, 02:42 PM
Also just checked and this booster pump is tied into the afr605, which i am asuming is an automatic way to control the flow which states that it is rated for 500ml/min.
https://www.amazon.com/Aquatec-AFR605-Flush-Timer-Valve/dp/B00FR7GR30
Im guessing this may be part of the issue as well since this is for a 50gpd membrane.

tom obrecht
04/23/2018, 03:23 PM
As someone who has been thru this personally with a private well of my own it’s a pain! I agree you need better rejection rates from the membrane but more than likely you co2 as well. Only way to deal with that is degassing the ro water before running it back thru the di canisters. I have tried a couple different ways of doing it and got tired of it. Spectrapure actually has a diagram of a degassing tube on their site somewhere. I found the process more than I wanted to deal with so now I buy resin from BRS in bulk and repack the
canisters. Yes I still burn thru resin but the initial cost of bulk vs prefilled canisters much less.

JordanM
04/23/2018, 06:29 PM
I tested the ph after the RO and got about 7.2ph and alk of 21ppm as well.