Log in

View Full Version : 65G=nano??


kase
06/14/2006, 03:10 PM
hi all,
well i finally upgraded to a 6g and took down the 29g. but i was looking around and didn't know if you could call a 65g a nano, complare it with the BIGGGG TANK forum you can.

so can a 65g+ 29g sump = nano??:confused:

hazy
06/14/2006, 03:14 PM
i dont think so. Nonos are anything under 30gal IMHO. anything over is a regular size tank.

bennerkla
06/14/2006, 04:00 PM
Much too big for a nano, I'd say 20 gallons or under. It's okay, we'll still be your friend :)

oddiseus
06/14/2006, 05:29 PM
Wow thats pretty big. I would say that is no longer a nano..... unless you only fill it up to the 2 inch mark. lol..

EricBrian
06/14/2006, 05:31 PM
I've talked to people who think anything under 100g is a nano. lol

ipiniowa
06/14/2006, 08:42 PM
Everything smaller than the ocean is a nano! ;)

itz frank
06/14/2006, 09:21 PM
the forum memo's on the forum page say that Large is anything from 180gal and up. Thus, anything smaller then 180 would be classified as a nano on this forum. Plus, anything smaller then the ocean would be classified as a nano. Unless you work at sea world. then that's big too.:lol:

kase
06/15/2006, 01:14 PM
I felt lost in the world..to small to be a LARGE tank and too big to be a NANO... thanks for being my FREINDS..:)