View Full Version : Hypo or Copper?
sleevasteve
09/25/2006, 01:11 AM
What works better in a qt for ich? Can you do both?
I vote for Hypo. and yes I did use both.
Paul B
09/25/2006, 05:17 AM
Copper is the best, fastest treatment for ich. It is guaranteed to work in a couple of days if done correctly. Most of the fish you buy are in water with copper.
Paul
wayne in norway
09/25/2006, 05:20 AM
Copper is more reliable, but hypo is pretty good, and gentler on sensitive species. Use both myself.
Paul B
09/25/2006, 05:32 AM
Wayne you are correct but he asked what works better.
Amphiprion
09/25/2006, 06:36 AM
Hyposalinity probably has less long term health implications if done for the usual prescribed amount of time.
sleevasteve
09/25/2006, 12:04 PM
Ok thanks for the input, I think I'll go with both, what do you suggest to get the salinity reading down to, and over how many days to progress to it?
MrSpiffy
09/25/2006, 12:45 PM
You only want to use one at a time, not both together. I've used hypo myself, and I'd use it whenever possible, unless treating a fish sensitive to salinity changes. I figure the fewer chemicals I use with my tank the better.
I was also told to keep the fish in there for 6 to 8 weeks.
Correction on the 6 to 8 weeks QT period. I think ick has a 2 to 3 week life cycle. The QT period should be about 4 weeks. At 3 weeks I started bring the silinity back up to normal.
This method work on this end. It's been 6 month and so far so good.
xDave
09/25/2006, 05:16 PM
I think copper is best. I do a freshwater dip first, I always adjust the ph to match the water they are in first. I then put them in the QT with copper and slowly (4 days or so) raise the temp to 83. Then I leave them in there for over 2 weeks, then l slowly lower the temp back down to the DT temp, and put them in.
jimbo045
09/25/2006, 05:31 PM
I'd stay away from Copper. JD
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.