PDA

View Full Version : Is a 90gal too small for a naso tang?


Absolut352
11/24/2006, 10:50 AM
Coming up with my fish list and I prefer the naso to all the others. Some sites say min 65gal and others say 120. What say you guys?

slojmn
11/24/2006, 10:56 AM
I don't think so. IMHO, I think tangs really need at least a 6 feet long tank with a lot of space to roam. Just my 2 cents worth :).

raddogz
11/24/2006, 11:29 AM
I agree Naso will do best in a tank with a minimum of six feet - 180g tank.

rccarlton
11/24/2006, 11:30 AM
I wouldn't do it. I had a 210 gallon with a 8" Naso tang and he seemed cramped, especially when trying to turn around. I have since upsized to a 420 gallon and have decided that is still too small for the full life span of the Naso.

Absolut352
11/24/2006, 02:04 PM
Ok scratch the naso. Thanks for the help guys.

zemuron114
11/24/2006, 03:16 PM
waaaaaaaay to small for a naso... they get huge!

toonces
11/24/2006, 08:30 PM
yeah, naso tangs get quite large...not a good idea.

Absolut352
11/24/2006, 08:45 PM
Yea ok i get it. Is there any others i can keep besides yellows and blues?

kimbertent
11/24/2006, 09:03 PM
i have an atlantic tang..he's love him becuase as a juvinile he is yellow but when he grows up he will change colors and turn entirely blue. i cant wait to slowly watch teh process :-)

ACBlinky
11/25/2006, 12:14 AM
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8614083#post8614083 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Absolut352
Yea ok i get it. Is there any others i can keep besides yellows and blues? I wouldn't try a blue tang (hippo) in a 90g either, they can easily reach more than a foot long. Look into bristletooth tangs - I like kole tangs, very pretty fish and they stay reasonably small. I'm not a huge fan of tangs in general but fell in love with a baby clown tang a while back... I was disappointed to find out that they get HUGE, so I can sympathize with you not being able to keep a naso.