View Single Post
Unread 02/18/2010, 01:40 AM   #14
TamiW
Seahorse Wrangler
 
TamiW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Greater Milwaukee Area, WI
Posts: 914
The plural of anecdote isn't data. Even the polls, at most can say people with or without skimmers have or have not had occurrences of gas bubble disease. It would be great for designing a controlled experiment, and that is pretty much it.

The problem with the skimmer-cause-hypothesis is that it discounts the cases where adding a skimmer has solved gbd. You cited public aquariums having trouble until they removed skimmers above, but I know of a few I talked to the staff at directly that had trouble until they added skimmers (but in many cases it was part of a system redesign, so who knows).

I think you're right though, it's a complex problem and it's likely to not have a single answer. We don't even know yet what the gas is that is causing the problem. CO2 is the obvious choice considering the effectiveness of diamox. However, O2 would make more sense if it was due to a skimmer, and N2 if its due to supersaturation from cavitation.


__________________
Tami

It's all about the snick!

Current Tank Info: I have a fish room.
TamiW is offline   Reply With Quote