View Single Post
Unread 01/08/2018, 09:45 PM   #15
der_wille_zur_macht
Team RC Member
 
der_wille_zur_macht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 17,749
hair algae on an algae reactor can reduce phosphate very quickly, but only to a point where it is limiting the algae's growth - it won't drop it below that point. For most people, that point is a healthy number, so it is OK.

The quickest method is probably LC dosing, but as others have mentioned, quick can be dangerous.

GFO is fine, too.

Many proponents of turf scrubbers will tell you to not use ANYTHING to reduce phosphate, as you'll be inhibiting the algae scrubber's growth and/or throwing nutrients out of balance. Algae scrubbers are great, but they can be finnicky in terms of interference with other nutrient control methods. Turf scrubbers target all the major nutrients but they need to be available in roughly the right proportions, if you're driving a single nutrient to zero (or close) through some other method, you'll ruin the performance of the scrubber.

That said, it is somewhat common for people to use (lower than normal) GFO or other phosphate control methods if phosphate is way out of control compared to other nutrients.

Which raises the question, what are your nitrate levels like?


__________________
Inconveniencing marine life since 1992

"It is my personal belief that reef aquaria should be thriving communities of biodiversity, representative of their wild counterparts, and not merely collections of pretty specimens growing on tidy clean rock shelves covered in purple coralline algae." (Eric Borneman)
der_wille_zur_macht is offline   Reply With Quote