Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAl2007
Also keep in mind that unless I'm mistaken there has been a lot of "Attention" on how Tunze was getting their flow rates and how when a 3rd party did the real testing their #'s were significantly less than rated. I think this has been addressed and Tunze is making design changes but fact of the matter is that their posted #'s weren't realistic in our tanks.
|
Tunze has made design changes already to the 6105, they used a wider nozzle and jumped up the voltage. The nanostreams did not suffer the same problem. Also, just should be mentioned that the study was conducted by a 3rd party at a competitors(EcoTech) building with equipment donated by them.
I also agree with Eric, no one complained before the study. Put a number on the flow people were happy with and you had several people up in arms.