View Single Post
Unread 01/31/2013, 09:37 AM   #27
SantaMonica
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Santa Monica, California, USA
Posts: 2,511
Quote:
It's important to have the food/nutrients flowing through the system.......... the end test read out has little value than to make sure I'm inside a range. The best example I can give is that if two 100g tanks read .03 the tank with 8 fish to feed will have better colors than the same .03 tank with 2 fish.
Very accurate. And I think "nutrient throughput" or "nutrient flux" is what you are trying to describe. Natural reefs have the highest flux, with massive input coming from phyto -> microbes -> zooplankton, and massive export from a combination of phyto and macro growth. The export is so large that the "standing stock" or ambient values of N and P are very low. But if N and P were visible and you could see their "flux", it would look like a hurricane.

The percentage of macro consumption of nutrients on reefs is about 50/50 at 5 meters, I believe. Shallower, and macro consumes more; deeper, and phyto consumes more.


__________________
Inventor of the easy-to-DIY upflow scrubber, and also the waterfall scrubber that everyone loves to build:
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1424843
SantaMonica is offline   Reply With Quote