View Single Post
Unread 06/19/2011, 09:30 PM   #9
WaterKeeper
Bogus Information Expert
 
WaterKeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 16,147
Not really West--

The problem with running a phosphate remover with carbon is that the carbon gets ladened with bacteria (and other nasty stuff) in a little over a week. The phosphate remover lasts far longer but if fouled by the growth on the carbon. It too will last only about a week or so if combined with the carbon. By running each is seperate chambers, phosphate remover first, carbon second, one greatly increases the life of the expensive phosphate remover,

I usually filled the phosphate camber 2/3's full but that is a matter for debate and I really don't know what level is best and most efficient,


__________________
"Leading the information hungry reefer down the road to starvation"

Tom

Current Tank Info: 130 Now out of service and a 29
WaterKeeper is offline   Reply With Quote