Quote:
Originally Posted by TropTrea
These two bulbs are extremly simular with the possibility that the real difference is in the marketing. If you look at the mfg claimed specs the ATI bulb peaks at 450 nm While the KZ bulb claims to have two peaks one at 420nm and the other at 460 nm.
If you were using these as stand alone bulbs you might see some difference but I seriously doubt it because the eye can barely detect light at 420 nm, and it very hard to see a difference between 450 nm and 460 nm. Besides that the normal manufaturing consistance between batches of these bulbs could easily be wider than any difference betwen these two bulbs.
|
Where did you find a spectral graph for a KZ bulb? I don't recall seeing graphs for any KZ bulb as they hide all of their information.
__________________
Ryan
Click on my user name and check out my homepage!
Current Tank Info: 50g Cadlights/Giesemann Spectra (250w Radium, 2 ATI Blue Plus, 2 ATI Actinic)/2 x Vortech MP10wQD/Skimz SN123/Eheim Compact 3000+
|