|
07/31/2018, 07:28 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 3
|
Coralline Algae dissapearing
This is my first ever post, so I hope I am doing this right. I have a 90 gallon saltwater tank with a 20g sump/refugium. It's mostly a FOWLR, but I am wanting to start adding some coral. I have one so far. The past few weeks the purple algae on my rocks has just been disappearing. In addition to that, it is not spreading to the new rocks I put in the tank. I was told that low calcium can cause that, but I just tested and I am high, close to 600ppm. (30 drops with the standard 5ml test kit) I checked Carbonate Hardness and the tube turned yellow at about the 8th drop, which I believe is a little low, so I just added a cap full of reef builder. My tank seems clean and healthy otherwise.
I have included some pics. Any ideas? |
08/01/2018, 02:21 AM | #2 |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
If PO4 gets a bit high that can be detrimental for coralline growth, so too no3.
Do you have an urchin? I think they eat coralline? |
08/01/2018, 07:35 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 17,691
|
Can you post your actual numbers for calcium, magnesium, alkalinity, pH and temp. It's difficult to maintain proper calcium and alk if the magnesium is low.
__________________
Adrienne The only thing to fear is fear itself....and spiders. |
08/01/2018, 08:48 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 394
|
Everything I have read/researched about Coralline Algae....is that you need to keep the water parameters as STABLE as Natural Seawater:
Salinity: 1.025-1.026 pH: 8.3 Calcium: 450 dKh: 8 Nitrates/Phosphates: as close to 0 as possible. Lighting: preferably blue spectrum wavelength Temperature: 80 F Supposedly, pH and Salinity are the most important to keep very stable. Being summertime, are you are using an ATO to keep Salinity stable? The other thing is flow and detritus buildup -- use a turkey baster or point your powerhead at the rocks containing the coralline. Detritus buildup could be suffocating it. The likely cause is that water parameters are probably fluctuating too much. |
08/01/2018, 09:16 AM | #5 |
Crab Free Zone
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,906
|
Alk 8-9
Calcium 420-440 Magnisum 1350 These must be maintained consistently for corals and coraline algae to build (grow) at all times Stability is the key, do not underestimate the need for accurate Magnism, if this is low then your CA and Alk will just bind up and will not be as available to the coral Skelton or coraline algae. |
08/01/2018, 09:33 AM | #6 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 17,691
|
Quote:
__________________
Adrienne The only thing to fear is fear itself....and spiders. |
|
08/01/2018, 04:26 PM | #7 |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
IME, stability of alk, mag & cal is something to aim for but it is not important for coralline algae growth. As long as they are at least at minimum levels coralline will grow, unless PO4 is too high. This will inhibit calcification.
I didn't have a doser, alk & cal constantly up & down, yet I had coralline growing all over the place. My bare bottom |
08/01/2018, 07:37 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 3
|
So it looks like my problem is very high PO4.
Calcium, Magnesium, and Alkalinity all seemed OK. Salinity at 1.24. What I can't figure out is why my PO4 is so high. I have a protein skimmer, refugium with spaghetti algae, I do water changes, I don't think I over feed, and my fish seem healthy. I'm wondering if my sump is actually hurting me. Can a dirty sump/refugium do more harm then good? I have a lot of detritus at the bottom of mine because the way the stand is built it can't be removed for a good cleaning. I was hoping that gunk down there wouldn't have such a big effect, but it's the only thing I can think of. Does that sound reasonable to you pros out there? Second question, is it OK to put a bag of carbon in a filter sock in the sump? I've read that it can bleed particles into the tank that are harmful for the fish. Other than cleaning my sump, and water changes, what would be the best options for PO4 reduction? |
08/01/2018, 07:49 PM | #9 | |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
Quote:
Use a PO4 reducing product. Yes activated carbon in a sock is ok. |
|
08/01/2018, 07:54 PM | #10 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: California
Posts: 2,482
|
Quote:
Coralline algae has never been a problem for me, whether I was testing/dosing for it or not. It's just there... (blue thumb?) |
|
08/02/2018, 09:04 AM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Rio de Janeiro
Posts: 394
|
Fish are very resilient, so that is not a good indicator of water chemistry. Unless you have a lack of oxygen in the water , most fish could probably tolerate a wide range of water parameters. Coralline algae is far less tolerant.
Get as much "gunk" out of your system as possible. Rocks, sediments, crap all contain phosphorous and will release it into your water. I read where even activated carbon (over time) can actually be detrimental to your tank because it will also leech phosphorous. If you have large rocks, they can leech phosphorous into your system for months. If you want to lower your PO4 levels, you could try Seachem PhosGuard. Also, when I had a serious GHA breakout, I had really good success using RedSea NoPoX. Just be careful using as it and start out slow. Literally within 3-4 days, the GHA started to fade and died. Additionally, since you have a refugium....put some Chaeto (or other form of macro-algae) in there which will suck up that PO4. Lastly, you could send a water sample to a professional lab.... something like ATI ICP-OES Complete Saltwater Water Test Kit. |
08/04/2018, 09:47 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Huntington, WV
Posts: 677
|
No one mentioned light in this thread. Without bright light there is no coralline algae. That's the main factor in coralline.
|
08/04/2018, 10:08 PM | #13 |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
|
08/05/2018, 12:15 AM | #14 |
Cloning Around
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Valencia, California
Posts: 25,267
|
Care to share your actual number? "Very high PO4" is often dependent on one's opinion, and it's hard to give advice on what to do without actual numbers.
Kevin
__________________
Back in the pool, swimming with the sharks... Current Tank Info: Red Sea 425XL w/Kessil AP700, Vertex 180i Skimmer, 2 x Vortech MP40s |
08/05/2018, 12:16 AM | #15 |
Cloning Around
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Valencia, California
Posts: 25,267
|
Yup, different colors for different lighting levels.
Kevin
__________________
Back in the pool, swimming with the sharks... Current Tank Info: Red Sea 425XL w/Kessil AP700, Vertex 180i Skimmer, 2 x Vortech MP40s |
08/05/2018, 08:35 PM | #16 | |
I'm really very likeable
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Down Under
Posts: 676
|
Quote:
Chapter 1 Physiological and Photomorphogenic Effects of Light on Marine Macrophytes 1.2 Photosynthesis Under Limiting Light Conditions Seaweeds of the order Laminariales reach their lower growth limit at about 0.6–1.2% of surface light, whereas for some deep growing rhodophytes a minimum of 0.001–0.05% was determined (L€uning 1981, 1990). The photosynthetic rate of different Laminaria species exceeds the respiratory rate and thus the compensation point (Ec) at about 5–8 mmol m 2 s 1 , whereas in deep water red algae an irradiation of about 2 mmol m 2 s 1 is already sufficient (L€uning 1981). Deepest crustose macroalgae seem to survive at an absolute light minimum of about 0.01 mmol m 2 s 1 (Littler et al. 1986). These red crustose corallines show a large light absorptance and employ light-harvesting pigments with a high energy-cost in their production per unit light absorption rate in a given underwater spectrum (Raven and Geider 2003). Raven et al. (2000) outlined that it is difficult to explain growth of algae below 0.5 mmol m 2 s 1 as there are energy-consuming reactions which use an increasing fraction of energy input when photon flux density decreases. Among these processes are redox back reactions of reaction center II, the leakage of H+ through thylakoid membranes and the turnover of photosynthetic proteins. The first of the two processes limit the rate of linear electron transport and ADP phosphorylation, while the latter consumes ATP. Thus, it is not yet clear how crustose red algae can grow down to 274-m water depth where the average incident photon flux density for 12 h day 1 does not exceed 0.02 mmol m 2 s 1 (Raven and Geider 2003). file:///C:/Users/Steve/Downloads/9783642284502-c1.pdf |
|
02/10/2019, 10:30 PM | #17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,012
|
Every time I’ve experienced great corralline growth was when I had lower light levels with an actinic light incorporated into the lighting system. Just my experience. I even remember reading that some people would keep the actinics on 24 hours a day to get the process really going.
|
02/11/2019, 05:33 PM | #18 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NW Iowa
Posts: 8,823
|
Quote:
__________________
Previous tanks: 200 gal fowlr 9" Emperor Angel and many different butterfly fish 4" maroon clown and several other fish, 50 gal sump, 40 gal mixed reef/fish mostly softies and LPS. Current Tank Info: 40b 750 gph 45 lbs lr, 2"-3" sand, 165w full spectrum dimable LED, 20 gal sump/refugium 30 lbs lr, Bak Pak 2 skimmer, 4" sock temp 79-80, sg 1.026, NH3 0, NO2 0, NO3 <10, ph 8.2, calc 400, mag 1300 |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|