Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 02/16/2018, 01:13 PM   #1
Blu3s94
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 269
Phosphate

After 2 years in the hobby I finally got a reactor and started measuring phosphate with a Hanna ULR.

BRS deluxe reactor running 1/2 cup ROX carbon and 1/4 cup of High capacity GFO. Both from BRS.

My Hanna measured 0.074 and 0.080 on my first 2 checks. I then measured from the output of the reactor to see if the GFO was doing it's job after a few days running. It measured 0.049.


I keep a mixed reef of SPS, LPS, and ZOAS.
Everything does fine and colors good. Should I be worried the phosphate is on the high side even though I'm sure my tank has been high for the last 2 years and SPS shows no side effects?

I started with a pretty low dose of GFO from reading all the bad about shocking the system. The only thing I notice is brown algae on the glass and sand that I constantly have to clean every 2 days.

It's a 125 gallon with a 40 gallon sump. Heavy stock of fish IMO. 8 fish total.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk



Last edited by Blu3s94; 02/16/2018 at 02:59 PM.
Blu3s94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 01:16 PM   #2
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Was the first number supposed to be .74 and not .074? big difference..

You certainly seem to have a phosphate issue..
What is your nitrate reading?
Have you thought about just not overfeeding so much?


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 02:34 PM   #3
Blu3s94
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgyvr View Post
Was the first number supposed to be .74 and not .074? big difference..

You certainly seem to have a phosphate issue..
What is your nitrate reading?
Have you thought about just not overfeeding so much?
I corrected it.

The hanna registered 24 and 26 PPB, using the conversion chart I got 0.074 & 0.080.

0 nitrate.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Blu3s94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 03:06 PM   #4
lapin
Registered Member
 
lapin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu3s94 View Post
After 2 years in the hobby I finally got a reactor and started measuring phosphate with a Hanna ULR.

I keep a mixed reef of SPS, LPS, and ZOAS.
Everything does fine and colors good. Should I be worried the phosphate is on the high side even though I'm sure my tank has been high for the last 2 years and SPS shows no side effects?
Just because "inquiring minds want to know" Your tank is doing good. You want to change it because "the hanna checker says your phosphate is high". Is this correct?


lapin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 03:27 PM   #5
Blu3s94
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapin View Post
Just because "inquiring minds want to know" Your tank is doing good. You want to change it because "the hanna checker says your phosphate is high". Is this correct?
Honestly the only reason I even started checking phosphate and getting a reactor was battling the brown algae. I saw alot of posts stating it's linked to high phosphate. The tank isn't new, it's going through RODI with 0 TDS. So I figured that's what it was.

If there's any reason for me to lower it. I would say that's it. It's possible I am not seeing the true growth and color from my coral? But it looks good to me.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Blu3s94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 05:13 PM   #6
Bent
I got nothin'
 
Bent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The anals
Posts: 6,420
Much like in healthcare.

Treat the patient not the numbers.


__________________
Quitters never lose.

[QUOTE=CStrickland]Who gets mad at a starfish?[/QUOTE]

Current Tank Info: 75g DT, 30G refugium, 10g chaeto tank, 50g stock tank basement sump
Bent is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 05:41 PM   #7
Subsea
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bent View Post
Much like in healthcare.

Treat the patient not the numbers.

Best advice I have heard in a long time.


__________________
Laissez les bons temps rouler,
Patrick Castille

Current Tank Info: 10,000G. Greenhouse Macro Growout
Subsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 05:44 PM   #8
HBtank
Premium Member
 
HBtank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,957
I have seen recommendations of 0.01-0.05 phosphate, although the consensus seems to be 0.01 - 0.03 is best.

But if your system seems to be fine, I would not be overly concerned with 0.07-0.08.


__________________
80g Aiptasia dominated reef tank.. with fish and now a bunch of berghia!

Current Tank Info: 80g tank, re-starting a reef after a zoanthid nudibranch plauge, followed by months of steady and unstoppable STN/RTN, crashed; stayed FOWLR for a couple years, currently an aiptasia dominated reef tank with fishies and BERGHIA
HBtank is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 05:54 PM   #9
Bent
I got nothin'
 
Bent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The anals
Posts: 6,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subsea View Post
Best advice I have heard in a long time.
You’d really be surprised the similarities between keeping a part of the ocean on life support, and a human being on life support....


__________________
Quitters never lose.

[QUOTE=CStrickland]Who gets mad at a starfish?[/QUOTE]

Current Tank Info: 75g DT, 30G refugium, 10g chaeto tank, 50g stock tank basement sump
Bent is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 07:54 PM   #10
tkeracer619
Registered Member
 
tkeracer619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 17,289
I would continue using very small amounts of GFO to bring the number to ~.03.

I wouldn't do it fast nor be too concerned about it. It could take a very long time to remove that amount since it is likely bound in the substrate and rock. Since the tank is doing well make the change to export a little more phosphate in your normal routines and let it fall with your normal maintenance routine.


__________________
Hobby Experience: 9200ish gallons, 26 skimmers, and a handful of Kent Scrapers.
Current Tank:
Vortech Powered 600G SPS Tank w/ 100gal frag tank & 100g Sump. RK2-RK10 Skimmer. ReefAngel. Radium 20k.
tkeracer619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/16/2018, 09:22 PM   #11
Blu3s94
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkeracer619 View Post
I would continue using very small amounts of GFO to bring the number to ~.03.

I wouldn't do it fast nor be too concerned about it. It could take a very long time to remove that amount since it is likely bound in the substrate and rock. Since the tank is doing well make the change to export a little more phosphate in your normal routines and let it fall with your normal maintenance routine.
This is what I'm going to do, thanks. I'm hoping once I get closer to the 0.01 - 0.05 most people go for I won't be scraping the glass every 2 days. Dimming the light or going dark for 3 days never helps. Always comes back. So it must be high phosphates.

Maybe my SPS will even benefit. Who knows.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Blu3s94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/17/2018, 08:15 AM   #12
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu3s94 View Post
I corrected it.

The hanna registered 24 and 26 PPB, using the conversion chart I got 0.074 & 0.080.

0 nitrate.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Totally fine as is IMO..
I would not be running GFO if I were you..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/17/2018, 02:19 PM   #13
THEUNION1
Registered Member
 
THEUNION1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: ORANGE COUNTY, CA
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bent View Post
Much like in healthcare.

Treat the patient not the numbers.



THEUNION1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/26/2018, 01:55 AM   #14
Blu3s94
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 269
Update: 10 days late I now have a reading of .040.

In between there's has been (1) 20% water change. Have not added or changed GFO.


Happy with this number. Have not noticed a difference in the algae growing on glass however. Going to see if it continues to drop or hopefully levels out here. Need to check output of GFO to see if it's depleted.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Blu3s94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.