|
01/09/2018, 06:12 PM | #276 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 1,354
|
Quote:
__________________
2x 65g displays with a 30g cryptic refugium and 30g sump - 55g reef 30g Bio-cube reef - I.M. 30g reef - 45g freshwater |
|
01/09/2018, 09:35 PM | #277 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 169
|
Nothing has changed. Still cyano on the sand, phosphate 0.03 ppm and nitrate around 5-6. Weekly 10% water changes.
Thinking about increasing the dose a little bit more. Currently at 24ml per day. Maybe raise it to 26ml per day and see if nitrate starts decreasing. |
01/10/2018, 02:07 PM | #278 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 1,354
|
Quote:
__________________
2x 65g displays with a 30g cryptic refugium and 30g sump - 55g reef 30g Bio-cube reef - I.M. 30g reef - 45g freshwater |
|
01/10/2018, 02:40 PM | #279 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 169
|
No.
I think that going from 20ml to 24ml daily was small and did not bring any noticeable changes to the tank (visibly and parameters). PH is being monitored real time via Apex. No noticeable changes. I now set it to 26ml. Let's see how it goes. But from what I see in the vinegar dosing table that I posted a few posts before in this thread, I can go a lot higher, taking into account that I have been dosing for many many months, probably a year now, I think that 26ml could be a relatively small daily dose. This is vinegar, which is much less potent that vodka. And for the first 6 months (or even longer), I was dosing Nopox, which I understand is somewhere in between Vodka and Vinegar in terms of potency. |
01/10/2018, 02:54 PM | #280 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 1,354
|
Quote:
Cheers! Mark
__________________
2x 65g displays with a 30g cryptic refugium and 30g sump - 55g reef 30g Bio-cube reef - I.M. 30g reef - 45g freshwater |
|
01/10/2018, 08:32 PM | #281 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Why does increasing the system’s volume not also increase the carbon dosing proportionally? Why is the maximum dose for a 25 gallon system 61 mL and a 1000 gallon system 124 mL? What am I missing?
|
01/10/2018, 08:47 PM | #282 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
|
|
01/10/2018, 08:58 PM | #283 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
The numbers are based on the vodka dosing chart, which are intended to be very conservative. The reasoning behind the lower proportions for larger tanks might be based on the cost or difficulty of water changes or other difficulties in dealing with a problem. You'd need to contact the authors to be sure, but I certainly would be more leery of larger doses in a larger and more expensive system that's much harder to handle. A few 30% water changes in a 29g system costs very little and the time and effort required is trivial. I have never managed a larger system, so I can't comment much. You could ask in the large tank forum.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
01/11/2018, 07:37 AM | #284 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NE Miss
Posts: 608
|
I'd guess it may scale more like surface area than system volume, since bacteria will be denser at surfaces than in water column itself.
Just a guess though. |
01/11/2018, 07:44 AM | #285 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
If you convert mL of vinegar dosed to ppm acetic acid in the aquarium, the first two weeks for the 25 and 1000 gallon columns are the same, 0.43 and .87 ppm, respectively. This is as it should be. The incremental changes to the dose is where the author mistakenly added a constant increment across all columns (system sizes). That math error gives 33 ppm acetic acid for a 25 gallon system and 1.7 ppm acetic acid for a 1000 gallon system by week seventeen. A minor point also to consider. Acetic acid and ethanol are not strictly interchangeable for dosing. While they both have two carbons, the energy derived from ethanol is higher. Acetic acid is a poorer energy source than ethanol and will require higher amounts than vodka. I have no idea at this point whether this fat would be discernible in a typical hobby aquarium, but it possibly addresses the nuisance organism growth difference, iffy as that topic is. |
|
01/11/2018, 12:14 PM | #286 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
|
|
01/11/2018, 04:12 PM | #287 | |||
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
Quote:
I was guessing that the non-linear scaling was intentional, which isn't the same as useful or correct. It might not be intentional, though, and even if it is, I doubt that there's much data behind it. I don't doubt that we could find better numbers given a sufficient number of tanks for experiments. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
|||
01/11/2018, 07:52 PM | #288 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 1,354
|
Is the dosage in that chart weekly or per day for that week?
__________________
2x 65g displays with a 30g cryptic refugium and 30g sump - 55g reef 30g Bio-cube reef - I.M. 30g reef - 45g freshwater |
01/11/2018, 08:46 PM | #289 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
Now I assume the 25 gallon column is correct and the math error occurs in the rest of the columns. This assumption seems valid because the last week daily dosing rate of 33 ppm acetic acid is about 10 ppm carbon. That seems like enough to process a nitrogen import of about 1 ppm nitrogen per day. Something you might do with heavy feeding. I did this bunch of math in my head so treat it only as me being transparent about my reasoning. No big deal though, right? The chart might not have been followed. Seems like everyone starts with a low dose of acetic acid or vodka and ramps up until they are satisfied or grow white slime, then they back off. I guess a potential issue is that folks might have stopped dosing prematurely because of the chart. We will have to let folks recall how their dosing regimen was impacted by the chart. I just started dosing but I am thinking in terms of ppm acetic acid added and ramping up from 1 ppm per day to some multiple of the nitrogen imported via feeding. |
|
01/11/2018, 10:07 PM | #290 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
It's the daily dose.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
01/13/2018, 09:20 AM | #291 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Who designed this dosing chart? It seems the vinegar chart was adapted by Randy and Cliff in their article in Reef Keeping. They derive their vinegar dosing chart from the earlier vodka dosing chart in a Reef Keeping article. In this earlier article, the authors said their information came from a thread on the subject and Jorg Kokott was a big contributor. Is Nathaniel Walton and Matt Bjornsen the original designers of the dosing chart?
My head hurts from reading old posts on the subject. In 2003-2004 Jorg Kokott was reporting that the Germans were attempting carbon dosing with vodka and said that he was going to write an article on the approach. I can’t find that article. Later “Heinz” started to post German posts to Jorg about the trouble they were having using information he was giving out. At one point “Heinz” summarized the dosing regimen as “nothing more than” starting with 1 mL vodka per 100 liters (I assume) which is about 25 gallons and increasing daily by 0.1 mL per 100 liters per day until the desired goal was achieved. “Heinz” was like “Belgian Anthias” in that he seemed to be warning everyone about the approach. I went to bed before going much beyond the middle of 2004. Jonathan? |
01/13/2018, 10:41 AM | #292 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NE Miss
Posts: 608
|
Some heroic archeology going on here. Very appreciated.
|
01/13/2018, 12:18 PM | #293 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Continued reading today and the answer to one of my questions, who created the table or at least the math: Jorg Kokott. So far, I haven’t found his article nor the rationale behind the seemingly odd dosing scale up. Was it purely empirical?
Back to reading... |
01/13/2018, 01:17 PM | #294 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
|
|
01/13/2018, 01:30 PM | #295 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 169
|
Interesting... But in the meantime, I think that we can agree that it should be pretty safe to dose 26ml daily (in 3ml intervals) to my 25 gallon system. Isn't it?
If Nitrate stays at 5+ in a couple of days and PO4 stays at 0.02 - 0.03ppm (or detectable), I plan to increase the daily dose of vinegar to 28 - 30ml. |
01/13/2018, 05:43 PM | #296 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I think that'd be a reasonable experiment to try. Many tanks start seeing bacterial buildups at some point, though, so I'd watch the tank.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
01/13/2018, 05:47 PM | #297 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
At 27ml I'm still not seeing any noticeable change in look (corals, fish, etc., cyano, algae) and definitely no bloom. No change in Nitrate, Phosphate. MAYBE less green algae, which was already very much under control. |
|
01/13/2018, 06:11 PM | #298 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I think upping the dose is perfectly reasonable.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
01/13/2018, 06:28 PM | #299 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
Is the carbon feeding denitrifying bacteria to consume nitrates? Or is the carbon increasing bacterial consumption of ammonia and the existing denitrifying bacteria are able to “catch up” consuming the nitrate? Or both? And which systems get bacterial blooms before nitrate reduction occurs? And why? |
|
01/13/2018, 06:56 PM | #300 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I certainly agree that carbon dosing sometimes seems to fail. We could test the hypothesis about the direct consumption of ammonia by putting a bit of rock in a container with a skimmer, etc, and feeding it some nitrate. There's going to be little ammonia created if there's no food added. If the nitrate disappears, that could be due to denitrification or more direct consumption of nitrate, and less likely to be ammonia uptake. I'd need to think about this for a bit, though.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
|
|