|
04/16/2010, 04:50 PM | #1326 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 195
|
Wow... just wow
|
04/16/2010, 05:50 PM | #1327 | |
Say no to clove polyps
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Marshall, TX
Posts: 1,374
|
Quote:
__________________
Gabriel Current Tank Info: 75 gallon mixed reef///40 breeder prop tank |
|
04/16/2010, 10:19 PM | #1328 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Water Change...........
Here are some shots of the water change........It took most of the day and a lot of effort!!!
I have a bunch of questions......................... First, I think this is sea weed.........true???? Is it a good thing ??????? Here are a number of individual shots of the two week old rock. It does NOT smell bad at all. Does it appear to be what we should expect?? Any other comments or questions?? Peter |
04/16/2010, 10:53 PM | #1329 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
The temp for the post water change environment 79 deg F.
The salinity is 1.0245. The rock was put back in the tanks in reverse order to ensure it was moved around. I had four kiddie pools that I used to hold the rock while I cleaned out the storage tanks. I needed about 20% of the old water to make sufficient NSW volume for both tanks. This was on the bottom................ My helpers................ Kiddie pools........... Each individual rock was shaken vigorously .............. We cleaned the tanks.......... and finally put the car back into the garage............... That was for the benefit of any night owls........ Peter |
04/16/2010, 11:01 PM | #1330 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
|
04/16/2010, 11:05 PM | #1331 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 488
|
|
04/16/2010, 11:08 PM | #1332 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
Peter |
|
04/16/2010, 11:15 PM | #1333 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
Peter |
|
04/16/2010, 11:18 PM | #1334 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
Welcome to the group. Peter |
|
04/17/2010, 01:41 AM | #1335 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: sadly camdenton missori
Posts: 276
|
Rocks looking great! are you doing live sand, or reg? or a mix? also whats your job title?? seems like all the Canadians i know are do fairly well for themselfs lol. Ever visit bamff?
|
04/17/2010, 09:20 AM | #1336 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 1,889
|
Quote:
Remove as much as you can by hand. I'd even take a blowtorch to any stump left attached to the rock, or as a minimum tweeze everything visible. (I had a bad experience with the stuff once.) Loose pieces floating around the tank will attach and start growing, so be careful when you prune. Mexican Turbo snails are one of the few creatures reputed to eat red turf algae. Hopefully I'm wrong and it's something else.
__________________
Some days it's not even worth chewing through the restraints. Current Tank Info: 250g starphire: 72x28x30, BeanAnimal drain with an oversized non-durso emergency drain, 4 inch DSB, 3x Reefbreeders Value LED fixtures, SWC/MSX 300A skimmer, Geo kalk reactor, 3 Vortechs w/bb, carbon reactor, and a RKL |
|
04/17/2010, 10:20 AM | #1337 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fort Walton Bch, FL
Posts: 8
|
Peter,
I have been following the progress for a few weeks and I have to say again as so many others have done in the past posts. WOW! You are going to have an amazing setup when you get ?Done? is a Reef tank ever "Done" :-) Your live rock looks really good to me and I see what looks like 3 different types of algae. Picture 1 shows one type and picture 3 and 6 show two other types. The post before shows picture 1 and said it looked like "Red Turf Algae". I don't think this is Red Turf and will most likely be very benificial to the tank when it is setup, if the algae survives. I have the same stuff growing in my reef tank and it grows slowly and stays put in one spot like a little tree. I am sure you will have some form of Tang in this system and as soon as it finds this little treat it will be gone anyway. This is just what I have seen in my own 5 yr old 300 Gallon Reef tank and never had a problem with it in my system. Picture 3 shows an algae that looks a bit more like a turf algae and should be looked into further. The algae in picture 6 looks more like a form of Dictyota, mostly found in green coloration but there are several varities of this algae. Link to a pic of Dictyota.... http://z.about.com/d/saltaquarium/1/...-acutiloba.jpg I would definately wait before pulling anything plant like off the rocks because most of the forms of life you will find on your rock will be benificial to the tank if it survives the swarms of Tangs. Hope this helps, keep up the good work. I hope it all turns out just like it looks in your head. Cheers, Mike in FL. Panhandle Link to a picture from RC thread showing Red Turf Algae... http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2007-0...s/image027.jpg Wow my first post in 6 years!! Go Peter! Last edited by Mahu; 04/17/2010 at 10:36 AM. |
04/17/2010, 10:28 AM | #1338 |
RC Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,803
|
Good to hear about the flow volume improvements. Here are a few points to torment you about mechanical filtration and UV sterilization, as I see you have expanded on them.
First of all, I'm in the minority as a proponent of mechanical filtration. Up until the early 90's it was a primary function of marine aquaria filtration systems. Then along came a few authors like Julian Sprung with the great idea that much of the junk we were collecting was in fact food for corals in our "nutrient starved tanks". As the hobby moved to more challenging hard corals (LPS & SPS) the demand for nutrient-poor water was increased, but for some reason the mechanical filter never came back into fashion. It just isn't a sexy high tech device you can show off to your friends. The value of detritus as a viable food source for coral was a little weak anyway, so I'm all for the removal of it before it enters the nitrogen and phosphate cycles (nutrient cycle). The advent of wave and surge devices coupled with engineered flow dynamics at greater volumes, meant that detritus stayed suspended for longer in modern systems. This resulted in a "snow globe effect", whereby detritus floated through the system almost indefinitely. Sure the protein skimmer captured some of it but in the absence of a filter sock, foam pad, polyester floss, pleated cartridge filter, or settling container you are relying on corals to consume detritus, when they are not detrivores. Now more than ever we need to use mechanical filtration. It does not rob corals of nutrients and it does not make the water "too clean". Mechanical filters increase water clarity, removing the collective yellowing effect of pigmented organics. This increase in clarity improves light penetration and photosynthesis. Pleated cartridge filters such as the ones Peter is using are typically rated at 25 microns, but with clogging they can remove particles down to one micron. This means that certain parasites like ich will be physically removed. There is such thing as too much mechanical filtration however. You have to leave some "food" for corals. For this reason I would consider running a filter cartridge in only one of your two mechanical filters at a time. Every week you can swap canisters and cartridges. You do have a big tank, so two filters is probably right-sized for your application. Alternatively, you can use the cartridge unit as a media filter and fill it with carbon, phosphate remover, or carbon source pellets etc. Some pleated cartridges have a hollow core with a perforated nylon tube in the center for holding chemical filter media. Another caveat of mechanical filtration as it is only as effective as the user. Once the detritus is trapped in the cartridge it should be removed within a week, preferably sooner. If you don't remove the cartridge for cleaning the detritus breaks down and dissolves and enters the nitrogen cycle as bacteria starts to consume it. Make sure the canister is easy to reach with shut-off/bypass valves and clearance to exchange cartridges. Order a few extra cartridges so you can periodically bleach them and keep clean ones in the on-deck circle for cleaning time. As for the UV sterilizers, they will run best on a bypass so the flow rate is slow. You get a higher kill ratio (zap count) if the water is exposed to the bulb for longer periods of time (dwell/contact time). The larger the organism, the longer it needs to be exposed to the UV. Bacteria is easy to zap, while larger parasites need more dwell time. This article sums up Pedro Escobal's formula for UV sterilizer throughput. http://www.aquariumadvice.com/articl...ers/Page1.html Escobal literally wrote the book on filtration devices and system engineering http://www.amazon.co.uk/Aquatic-Syst.../dp/1888381051 The book is out of print, but you can find it used online. The book gets very technical, but you don't have to be a rocket scientist to follow it. The author however is. As a matter of fact he wrote the book on it as well. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Methods-Astr...tt_at_ep_dpt_1 Two of them actually. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Methods-Orbi...tt_at_ep_dpt_2 He never did get around to finishing that book about brain surgery I hope I haven't deprived you of any sleep over this Peter |
04/17/2010, 10:29 AM | #1339 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
Here's another rock with the same thing but as I noted there are only a few. Thanks very much for the feedback. Peter |
|
04/17/2010, 10:31 AM | #1340 | |
Premium Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wakefield, Rhode Island
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
__________________
Do or do not, there is no try ! Current Tank Info: Transition..... |
|
04/17/2010, 10:32 AM | #1341 |
RC Sponsor
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,803
|
|
04/17/2010, 11:17 AM | #1342 | |
Registered Member
|
Quote:
__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock |
|
04/17/2010, 11:20 AM | #1343 | |
Registered Member
|
Quote:
This is assuming that you are running carbon in some sort of secondary reactor and phosban(which I understand can't be effectively run in a cannister filter)
__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock |
|
04/17/2010, 01:04 PM | #1344 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
I believe you are right, I checked the links you provided and they appear very consistant with your observations. The picture #3 as you pointed out is different than the others. The sample that I have on my rock is not as developed as the turf algae in the link so it is more difficult to be certain. The picture I have is considerably higher resolution but if I post that here its just a fraction smaller than the state of Texas and would probably sink the entire forum. |
|
04/17/2010, 01:35 PM | #1345 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
I will take your advice on the accessibility of the filter canisters for maintenance. I also agree with the importance of frequent monitoring of the efficiency to ensure the material is removed.....another 'to do' on my SOP. As far as using the canisters with various alternative materials I will probably wait until I have a baseline of experience and data. more on that subject I'm sure.............. Thank you again sir for your assist........There are those on this thread now who also appreciate your comments and have significantly more knowledge and experience than I. Your presence on this thread is one of its greater assets. Peter |
|
04/17/2010, 01:39 PM | #1346 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
Peter |
|
04/17/2010, 01:42 PM | #1347 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
|
04/17/2010, 02:36 PM | #1348 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
We don't use titles in Canada. There really is only one person wearing many hats!!!! Everyone else left after the first snowfall!!!! They are living in Florida! I haven't been to Bamff recently but I have been to Banff which I suspect is close by Peter |
|
04/17/2010, 02:55 PM | #1349 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
Mike, here is a close up of the #3 pic........I'm not sure but I don't think it's red turf algae. Whatever it is it certainly looks healthy....... Mr Wilson is preparing some salad dressing for it........no salt please Shawn, I'm trying to cut down. Peter |
|
04/17/2010, 03:17 PM | #1350 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,518
|
Quote:
I'm not sure Shawn......here is a close up of the first pic....... What do you think? Peter |
|
|
|