|
12/05/2011, 04:42 PM | #51 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
It's great to see Advanced Aquarist covering our work with Lasers.
In addition to simply "making things quickly go away" I think lasers can/will be helpful in other marine endeavours. I'm currently working on a few videos focusing on, Preventing coral battles and potentially limiting allelopathy - The laser is perfectly suited for maintaining margins or a "DMZ" between potentially battling corals. As many of us (guilty as charged) end up with many SPS in tight quarters, a laser can be used to help prune back infringing corals with surgical accuracy without having to remove the coral, or risk damage through traditional pruning methods. I'll be using some fast growing Monties and Acros for these tests. Prepping areas for regrowth - With corals subject to receding tissue, the exposed skeletons quickly become covered in various types of algae (no doubt due to the nutrients from the decaying coral.) I've tested using the laser to "scrub" those areas, hopefully creating a host surface that will aid in the coral regrowth. At first glance, it works very well, and the targeted surfaces are squeaky clean. Its especially effective at cleaning deeply grooved skeletons such as Acanthastrea. If successful, I can see potential benefit in the use on high value chalice corals. Time will tell if it provides any benefit to the coral in terms of speeding recovery. Prepping areas prior to affixing a frag or coral - It's very simply to use the laser to prep an area before affixing a frag (either on a plug or directly.) In just seconds, and areas can be lased removing any potential pests or nuisance algae, and at least in theory - providing a better place for the coral to adhere to and encrust. I'm also curious to see if laser "etching" of frag plugs results in any difference in coral growth or rates of encrusting. There are many others areas to explore including laser fragging of soft corals and whether the cauterization effect is beneficial, Time will tell if any of these provide real benefit, or are just seemingly good ideas that don't work...And of course, I've also got the prerequisite Xenia, GSP, Aiptasia and Majano videos under development for those focusing solely on pest vaporization.
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change Last edited by CalmSeasQuest; 12/05/2011 at 05:06 PM. |
12/06/2011, 02:20 PM | #52 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
I completed a brief series of videos showing the eradication of Aiptasia, GSP and Xenia along with the cutting of a "DMZ" between battling Montipora.
I'll post them as soon as the uploads are processed by YouTube.
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change |
12/06/2011, 04:51 PM | #53 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
Here are a few short videos (HD) showing how different corals respond to the laser. The Montipora were lasered through glass - the rest through acrylic.
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change |
12/06/2011, 05:03 PM | #54 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 117
|
Awesome. Great post!
|
12/07/2011, 09:41 AM | #55 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,054
|
Has anyone gone deeper than 12" in the tank, and if so what laser was used? Due to cube layout most of mine are 18" from glass.
__________________
Current Tank 150 Cube 36x36x27 2mp40w es, four bulb Tek and six bulb Tek, SRO 3000 |
12/07/2011, 09:47 AM | #56 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
I lased a xenia patch with similar looking results. A couple days later it needed a second treatment, I had to lase it to a pile of gelatinous goo to kill it. I am still waiting to see if the stalk base will grow a new head. |
|
12/07/2011, 11:37 AM | #57 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
Thanks - Lot's more to do, but it's a start.
Quote:
Quote:
The Monti test was perfect... It vaporized all the tissue in the lased area without hurting any of the surrounding polyps or tissue. All that remains is the bleached with skeleton. Here are a few thoughts I've formulated since starting these tests...
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change Last edited by CalmSeasQuest; 12/07/2011 at 11:52 AM. |
||
12/07/2011, 08:25 PM | #58 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 111
|
Very interesting
|
12/08/2011, 09:02 AM | #59 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,054
|
Does anyone else find it amazing that due to our love of saltwater fish, we have now learned advanced plumbing, introductory electrical, acrylic fabrication, advanced biology, and now lasers.
__________________
Current Tank 150 Cube 36x36x27 2mp40w es, four bulb Tek and six bulb Tek, SRO 3000 |
12/08/2011, 09:25 AM | #60 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
Quote:
We've come a long way from that fresh water tank that used to sit on our bedroom dresser
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change |
|
12/08/2011, 10:17 AM | #61 |
Darin Schmidt
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 537
|
and no comment on what i suggested would make this completely safe.....
|
12/08/2011, 11:13 AM | #62 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
Quote:
Thanks for your input. Although I'm not sure I completely understand your post, it does not appear to address exposure to the beam endpoint. I think the important take away here is I don't beleive it's possible to make this process "completely safe" with any single device. It requires a series of safety practices, most of which are human-elements as opposed to equipment.
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change |
|
12/08/2011, 11:22 AM | #63 |
Darin Schmidt
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 537
|
there is no exposure to the beams endpoint by you, the tube would be wide enough to capture andy reflective light. The cross hair (draw an X and put a circle in the center, earase the inside of the circle) thats the endoint where the laser would shoot through. Get that pont really close to your target, the close, the less of a change of stray rays.
|
12/08/2011, 11:56 AM | #64 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,618
|
I guess you are assuming a water proof laser. The other problem is that most of the laser look like the focus ring is near the front. I think that maybe the biggest obstacle to over come for safety. Short of soldering something to the focus ring I have not thought of any good ideas.
__________________
Click my home page for Thread Summaries Current Tank Info: 75 gallon lps and fish |
12/08/2011, 12:03 PM | #65 |
Darin Schmidt
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 537
|
Not really, i was thinking you would have a long tube, which is why you would have a light for inside the tube, this way you can keep the light and the LCD display out of the water. It makes it more cluncky than just pointing a laser into water while getting a tan, but, if safety is import then this would be a good solution, but not easy. I dont expect anyone to use/make this, but it would completely shelter you from the rays except for any that shoot out at about 180 degrees.
|
12/08/2011, 01:58 PM | #66 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
Quote:
I've been working on an idea being initially discussed and being furthered by CJ. Creating a "conduit" that when lasing from above the tank, would shield the beam and all endpoint viewing angles, except those of the user. I'm using Mylar sheeting, rolled into cone shape that will burn through when lasered directly in air, is seemingly cooled enough by the water to prevent burning (at least in my testing so far with 1800mW of 445nm.) In addition, any laser striking the Mylar in actual use would be glancing, likely unfocused and would largely be reflected thereby imparting much less energy. Wrap the end of the laser in the Mylar on an angle so a cone shape is produced. This provides a larger area to shield the beam endpoint and minimized the chance of the beam striking the walls of the cone. A bit of tape secures the cone and affixes it to the laser (the taped section does not get wet.) I cut out a section of the end of the cone allowing easy viewing (by the user) of the beam endpoint while shielding all other angles. This cut-out also allows air to escape making it more stable and easier to stay "on-target". It's still too early to say if this will be a viable option. I do note that while it works, I don't get as "clean" and endpoint when shooting through the surface vs. shooting through the tank walls. This is likely due to reflections from the surface of the water. It's a bit clunky, but does appear to provide protection benefits in a simple and inexpensive manner including,
Time and more testing will tell...
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change |
|
12/08/2011, 02:24 PM | #67 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
In trying to determine the best (and safest) methods for the use of lasers, I'm not sure 445nm is the best wavelength for this application. It looks like 405nm has a couple of significant benefits namely the ability to focus to a much finer endpoint (445nm endpoint is actually a line rather than a dot.) This further concentrates the cutting/burning power while requiring much less power output.
It appears that a 405nm running at 900mW would be as effective as a 445nm at 1800mW. This would be safer and more cost effective. I'm working on obtaining a 405nm build now - testing to follow...
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change |
12/12/2011, 09:01 AM | #68 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
For anyone questioning the potential damage a 1000mW laser can do - Here's a story about a laser hobbyist inadvertently struck in the eye by a 1 watt 445 nm, blue laser (less powerful than what many are using in aquaria.) Even though the laser struck his eye for only about a second (as it rolled off a table), it resulted in burns to his retina requiring surgery (at the time time this was written, the outcome of surgery was still pending.)
To give you a sense of the damage to his eye - Here's an image of a healthy retina... Here's the image of the retina damaged by the laser... Had he been wearing appropriate eye protection, no damage would have resulted.
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change Last edited by CalmSeasQuest; 12/12/2011 at 09:14 AM. |
12/12/2011, 09:21 AM | #69 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 578
|
That's scary!
CJ
__________________
65 gal Oceanic Starfire w/ Apex Controller, 2 Vortech MP10wES Powerheads, SWC 160 Extreme Cone Skimmer, Calc. Reactor, DIY LED Lights Current Tank Info: 65 gal Oceanic tank w/ starfire glass, 15 gal sump, Apex Controller, DIY LED lighting, 2x Vortech MP10 |
12/12/2011, 10:09 AM | #70 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,618
|
CalmSeaQuest, you know a lot more than me, but I don't know the glasses would have protected him. Glasses are safe for looking at the spot created on a non reflective surface. I am not sure they would block a full on laser hit. They might have helped, but I think there would still be damage. I am only trying to clarify as I don't want people to think that glasses are the whole answer.
__________________
Click my home page for Thread Summaries Current Tank Info: 75 gallon lps and fish |
12/12/2011, 11:24 AM | #71 |
Moderator
10 & Over Club Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Long Island, NY/North Miami
Posts: 36,538
|
Really makes one wonder about the wisdom of playing with lasers, when there are other safer methods available.
__________________
Bill "LOL, well I have no brain apparently. " - dc (Debi) Current Tank Info: Far too many tanks according to my wife, LOL. |
12/12/2011, 11:33 AM | #72 | |
Cheesehead Reefer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,351
|
Quote:
I understand that life is not risk-free, but there are risks worth taking and others, not so much. I won't be using any lasers in my tank. I'm not afraid of them, but for me the risk/reward ratio just isn't right.
__________________
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow." ~ Albert Einstein Current Tank Info: 215 gal TBS Reef |
|
12/12/2011, 01:37 PM | #73 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 572
|
Topic suggestion to add to the best pratice sheet;
"What to do if an accident occurs" subtopic; research local treatment before operating laser. I was unable to find a complete nationwide listing for the U.S., but a quick google search provided me the results for my local area. |
12/12/2011, 05:54 PM | #74 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 733
|
Maybe I've missed the answer in all the laser threads Ive read, but what are these powerful lasers used for (outside of aquaria ), and why are they so easy to acquire?
__________________
220 in-wall reef, 10 clown pairs, 4 fry tanks, 18 grow-out tanks Current Tank Info: 220 in-wall reef, clownfish breeding/growout system, 20L coral QT and 29 fish QT |
12/12/2011, 07:01 PM | #75 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,230
|
Quote:
As for my comment that glasses would have protected the user in this case - It's based on the following, Although all safety glasses warn against direct viewing, a good quality pair of safety glasses such as pair of Eagle Pair 190-540nm are rated OD 4+ (reduce the intensity of 190-540nm laser light by a factor of 10,000 or more) The 1watt 445nm laser output would have been reduced to no more than .1mW. Here's test of a set of Eagle Pair glasses vs a 2000mW 445nm laser (DOUBLE the power of the laser that inflicted the eye injury) demonstrating that the Eagle Pair lenses reduced the laser to less than .1mW (the laser power meter actually reads zero) and would have protected the user from any eye damage from a brief exposure. This would NOT work for an extended period of time as eventually the glasses would heat and potentially melt. That said, obviously no one should EVER allow a laser beam to strike their eye, regardless of any eye protection.
__________________
-Tom The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw Current Tank Info: 96X30" 270Gal, Kessil 360WEs, BK250 Double Cone, 400 gal ASW station with continuous water change |
|
Tags |
aiptasia, algae, laser, pests, xenia |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pest id! Helpppp!! | fishyman12 | New to the Hobby | 6 | 07/14/2011 01:46 PM |
brown algae on some of my corals | jenreef | Reef Discussion | 2 | 01/13/2011 02:12 PM |
Various Macro Algae - Good, Bad, or 'oh no!'? | inktomi | Marine Plants & Macroalgae | 3 | 12/12/2009 06:14 PM |
WTB Clean pest and pest algae free LR | chevegan | Southern California Reefers | 5 | 06/02/2008 06:46 PM |