Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 05/04/2007, 09:32 AM   #26
20 20
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Stewartstown, PA
Posts: 1,246
I'm currently 2 months into 'rock cooking' episode, due to briopsis. I figured I need another 1 or 2 months to make sure it's dead. Sounds like maybe upping the MG in the 'cooking tank' would help ensure it's dead?


20 20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2007, 09:58 AM   #27
davidryder
Claris or Elliot?
 
davidryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nightopia
Posts: 2,750
Sounds like it... we need to get the word out about this


__________________
A rolling stone gathers no moss...

Current Tank Info: 90g mixed reef, corner overflow (Mag 9.5), 25g refugium (Mag 5), 15g refugium, Orbit 260w pc, Pan World 50PX-X (Closed loop), AquaC EV-120 (now skimmerless)
davidryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2007, 10:23 AM   #28
TWallace
Registered Member
 
TWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally posted by 20 20
I'm currently 2 months into 'rock cooking' episode, due to briopsis. I figured I need another 1 or 2 months to make sure it's dead. Sounds like maybe upping the MG in the 'cooking tank' would help ensure it's dead?
Based on other's experiences, cooking the rocks won't usually kill the bryopsis. It can live with no lights and extremely little nutrients for a long, long time. So, yes I'd up the magnesium in your cooking tank to somewhere between 1500 and 1600. The bryopsis should be all gone within two weeks (most of it will be gone in 1 week, based on my experience).


TWallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2007, 11:54 AM   #29
blide
Premium Member
 
blide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 590
Very interesting...

Bump - Maybe someone in the plant/algae field nows more about this.


blide is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2007, 11:57 AM   #30
illcssd
Registered Member
 
illcssd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,295
Interesting, very interesting. Chewie just lmk about this thread and i have a freind that has been battling this algae for close to a year now. He has done everything twallace stated to no avail. I will let him know and see if i can get him to take pictures of the progress as it goes.
Thanks twallace.


__________________
--Austin

60g Ecotech anemone cube;
illcssd is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2007, 01:00 PM   #31
mr.gaboozlebag
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 10
Do you know if this would work with other kinds of algae?


mr.gaboozlebag is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2007, 01:29 PM   #32
Peter Eichler
Registered Member
 
Peter Eichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,081
Quote:
Originally posted by mr.gaboozlebag
Do you know if this would work with other kinds of algae?
I didn't have othe nuisance algae at the time but the high mag levels had no ill effects on coraline, Halimeda, Gracillaria, a few different Caulerpa sp., Botryocladia, and a few other macroalgaes.
If it is in fact the magnesium levels the killed the Bryopsis I don't think it will work on many other algae species.


Peter Eichler is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/05/2007, 05:13 AM   #33
neelix
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fitchburg, Mass
Posts: 209
How is it doing? Still fading away?


neelix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/05/2007, 12:06 PM   #34
TWallace
Registered Member
 
TWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,464
Yep, here's a pic I took last night of the same rock:



There's barely any bryopsis left on the rock.


TWallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/05/2007, 12:46 PM   #35
Grunt
Premium Member
 
Grunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,038
Can we see a FTS, did you happen to take before and afters of the FTS or just that area?
Cheers


Grunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/05/2007, 01:44 PM   #36
TWallace
Registered Member
 
TWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,464
Sorry, didn't take any FTS before the treatment. This particular rock was one of the worst spots in the tank, though, which is why I picked it.

I did have a minor tank incident this morning. I spent the night at my GF's place last night. When I got home this morning I noticed a strange noise coming from the tank. The return pump was sucking in air. The cause of this was the bryopsis in the fuge was falling apart and getting blown out into the main tank. The trouble with that is there was an astrea snail in the output tube. The dying bryopsis got stuck on the astrea snail, restricting the output of the refugium, which caused it to overflow, which then caused the sump to run low. I moved the snail and pulled out the dying bryopsis from the refugium to fix the flow.

Then I did something stupid. I poured water into my kalk top off bucket (I should have just poured it in the sump directly instead), which mixed with the kalk at the bottom of the bucket. The bucket then pumped that freshly mixed kalk into the tank, making the water very cloudy. I did a 25% water change, but all 4 of my clams (3 crocea, 1 derasa) have been spawning today as a result of the kalk. Nothing else seems affected and the water is finally clearing up now. I know that clams spawn when they're stressed. I don't know if clam eggs/sperm are detrimental to the system. This is the first time they've spawned.


TWallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/05/2007, 01:59 PM   #37
Spracklcat
Disaster Expert
 
Spracklcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 1,714
Clam eggs and sperm will do nothing but good for the tank--it's good coral food. And don't worry about the kalk addition either. Many people add a freshyly mixed slurry of kalk nightly with no ill effects. The water will clear and it will be fine. If anything, the extra pH boost will help kill off the Bryopsis.

Christine


Spracklcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/05/2007, 02:22 PM   #38
jdieck
Registered Member
 
jdieck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maumee, OH
Posts: 15,673
I doubt it is spawning. As filter feeders, that is the way they will expell the suspended precipitated carbonate that they filtered out from the water column.


__________________
Did I write what I wrote? What the heck am I talking about! Well..... Nevermind.

Current Tank Info: 225 gal reef, DSB, 40 g sump w/ LRT100 return, 37 g pre-sump, 3 MH 250 W 15K, 4 96 W PC dual actinic,ETS 1500 Skim.w/LRT70, 20 lb Ca R., 40 W UV, 1/3 HP chiller, two 350 W Htrs, Neptune II Cont., 330 P LR/ 330 P LS. 55 gal Refugium
jdieck is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 05:23 AM   #39
Mr31415
Registered Member
 
Mr31415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Surrey, Canada
Posts: 1,926
Once one has reached and maintained the 1600 Mg level - how do you get it down to 1280 again? Water changes?


Mr31415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 06:14 AM   #40
BFG
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 700
Why would you want to lower the mag level? Sorry, newbie asking a silly question.


__________________
If you've learnt, teach.
If you have, give.
BFG is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 06:14 AM   #41
JB NY
Registered Member
 
JB NY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 9,207
Water changes will bring down the mag. Most salts mix up to about 1100 mag with a SG of 1.025.


__________________
-Joe

TOTM Sept 2002 | Reefland April 2004 | CORAL Magazine Nov 2007
Featured Tank "Coral Reef Aquarium" 2011 | Reef Spotlight 2018

Current Tank Info: 270G SPS Tank, 140G sumps, 35G Frag Tank, Ultra Reef Akula UKS-200 Skimmer, Apex, Giesemann Spectra 3x250W MH 4x80W T5, 2xReefbrite Tech 72" Blue LED, Triton Dosing, ARID C30 Algae Reactor, Maxspect Gyre
JB NY is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 06:27 AM   #42
Mr31415
Registered Member
 
Mr31415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Surrey, Canada
Posts: 1,926
Because a Mg level of 1600 is much higher than natural seawater and it is not a good idea to keep it there indefinitely.


Mr31415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 06:55 AM   #43
Gary Majchrzak
Team RC Member
 
Gary Majchrzak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 41,560
Quote:
Originally posted by TWallace
Nope, no ill effects from the mag. All corals, fish and inverts still look and act normal. The biggest surprise to me is that the chaeto in the fuge deals with the magnesium fine, but bryopsis is killed by it.
have you noticed any increase in coralline growth since upping the Mg?


__________________
over 24 years experience with multiple types of marine aquarium systems
*see Upstate Reef Society Forum on RC and FB* GOOGLE JUNIOR'S REEF

Current Tank Info: 84x24x30 265g reef past TOTM honors
Gary Majchrzak is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 11:42 AM   #44
mazdaghost
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 59
do high mag count affect Anemones. because i have been fighting this for six month and this is the only thing i have not tried.


mazdaghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 12:09 PM   #45
TWallace
Registered Member
 
TWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally posted by Gary Majchrzak
have you noticed any increase in coralline growth since upping the Mg?
No, I haven't, but I added a tuxedo urchin and a pincushion urchin to my system in the last couple months and they've been mowing down some coralline forests for me. Apparently they mostly like to eat the stuff on the back of the tank, not the front or sides. They're plotting against me, I can sense it.


TWallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 12:10 PM   #46
TWallace
Registered Member
 
TWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,464
Quote:
Originally posted by mazdaghost
do high mag count affect Anemones. because i have been fighting this for six month and this is the only thing i have not tried.
My large GBTA is unaffected by the magnesium.


TWallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 12:15 PM   #47
Neptune777
Premium Member
 
Neptune777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,700
TWallace,
Did you perform manual pruning as it was dying or did you let it "wither on the vine" so to speak?


Neptune777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 12:54 PM   #48
neelix
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fitchburg, Mass
Posts: 209
I noticed all snails have been impacted. Mostly the real large ones seem to be in shock. Also the cuke I have seems to be in shock as well.

How are the snails in your tank??


neelix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 02:26 PM   #49
Neptune777
Premium Member
 
Neptune777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,700
Quote:
Originally posted by neelix
I noticed all snails have been impacted. Mostly the real large ones seem to be in shock. Also the cuke I have seems to be in shock as well.

How are the snails in your tank??


Same here....snails do not like the new high Mg levels in my tank. Everything else looks fine. Looks like I will lose a bunch!


Neptune777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/06/2007, 04:43 PM   #50
TWallace
Registered Member
 
TWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,464
I let mine "wither on the vine" so that the photo series would show only what the magnesium did, not any manual pruning.

Weird about the snails. I didn't notice them have any trouble with the mag in my system. I have about 12 kinds of snails, too. Though some are nocturnal so it would have to notice them have trouble with the magnesium.

The only possible downside I noticed in my system is my pulsing sinularia turned paler, almost white. Some toadstool leathers also turned whiter, but my green polyped toadstool leather was unaffected. None of those corals look like they're in danger of dying, though.


TWallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.