|
04/29/2015, 10:19 PM | #301 | |||
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Santa Monica, California, USA
Posts: 2,511
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
04/30/2015, 07:52 AM | #302 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 739
|
Why only in the pores? If it absorbs phosphates, than it should be absorbing it everywhere that has access to the phosphates.
Quote:
Doesn't the periphyton pull the P from the LR? Isn't that what "cooking" the LR is doing? Isn't this going on all of the time? G~
__________________
Friends don't let friends use refugiums. Current Tank Info: Not dead yet. |
|
04/30/2015, 07:51 PM | #303 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Santa Monica, California, USA
Posts: 2,511
|
I just meant throughout the inside of the rock, like a sponge.
Any export is export. Inorganic phosphorous (as PO4) is what you want to remove. Periphyton does eat inorganic phosphorus as it comes out of the rock, as well of from the water column. It converts it into glucose as well as living tissue, which then feeds the animals (especially pods for mandarins). Cooking is unrelated to any of this. |
05/01/2015, 05:57 AM | #304 | |||
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 739
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What if it is related? What if the periphyton removes the PO4 from the calcium carbonate and makes it available for the rest of the organisms in the system? Doesn't something have to release the PO4 from the calcium carbonate in order to make it available for higher organisms? G~
__________________
Friends don't let friends use refugiums. Current Tank Info: Not dead yet. |
|||
06/01/2015, 10:36 AM | #305 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: michigan
Posts: 220
|
Learned a lot and am testing some of the theory contained here. Dropped my alk from 9 to 8 with further drop planned.
|
06/01/2015, 10:59 AM | #306 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,092
|
I really think there is a "Sweet Spot" that needs to be found and its very difficult to lock in our tanks for long periods into the spot. I notice my tank will hit it for a few months then fall out then back in.
Let face it, we don't feed our tanks the "Exact" amount every day, there are just sooo many variables.
__________________
75 Lee Mar Peninsula Tank, Reef Octo Elite 150, Custom Advanced Acrylic Sump, (2) MP40, Vectra M2 Main Pump, (2) XR15 Pro, Clear Water ATS CW-50, Alkatronic,GHL Doser 2.1, Apex Neptune El with Trident |
06/01/2015, 01:27 PM | #307 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaverton
Posts: 5,290
|
Quote:
I actually like my Alk at 9 and see great growth and coloration from it IME
__________________
120g mixed reef 90g QT |
|
06/01/2015, 01:59 PM | #308 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: michigan
Posts: 220
|
|
06/02/2015, 05:07 PM | #309 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: South Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 844
|
I've never really understood the arguments about raising one parameter and dropping another to accelerate growth or improve colouration.
In what conditions are corals at their healthiest and most vibrant......in their natural environment. Natural reef conditions are roughly: Typical Surface Ocean Value:1 Calcium 420 ppm Alkalinity 7 dKH Salinity sg 1.025-1.027 pH 8.0-8.3 Magnesium 1280 ppm Phosphate 0.005 ppm Ammonia <0.1 ppm So why aren't these the figures we aim for? Coupled with intense lighting of course. Using a quantum meter I measured about 1850 PAR on the ocean surface on a winter's day here in Western Australia. My tank has a PAR reading of 650 at the water surface. Obviously it goes without saying that the sun has to penetrate further into the ocean but the intensity is higher than anything we can replicate in our homes. So I believe that by trying to match the natural parameters and having intense lighting at the correct colour spectrum which is spread through the tank will give you the best chance of success.
__________________
Current tank - 220 gallon mixed reef..Many thanks to Waterbox, Ecotech Marine, Neptune Systems, Pax Bellum, Nyos, Eheim and Hailea for creating my system..and making me poor!! Current Tank Info: 220 Gallon mixed reef |
06/02/2015, 06:45 PM | #310 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New England, U.S.
Posts: 4,595
|
Quote:
Also, a natural diet doesn't always provide the best of everything. A good example is folic acid. Before we figured out prenatal vitamins, having a baby be born with its spine on the outside was just one of those things that happens if you have bad luck. Now moms take a pill with no side effects that jacks up their folic acid, and the bones stay on the inside. It's an unnatural tweak of one parameter that significantly increases viability. It would stand to reason that when we are trying to get things to grow fast and be pretty, there might be an analog in our tanks if we can control for side effects.
__________________
If you're havin tank problems I feel bad for you, son. I got 99 problems but a fish ain't one Current Tank Info: 3/2016 upgrade to 120g. Chalk bass, melanurus, firefish, starry blenny, canary blenny, lyretail anthias, engineer gobys, kole tang. Softies / LPS / NPS. <3 noob4life <3 |
|
06/02/2015, 10:45 PM | #311 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,196
|
Quote:
My view is the same as yours, pretty much. One minor different. 'Too much input, filtration not up to par, or not enough export'. Though essentially, it is 'not enough biology'. And I agree that it has to be a balance of all three. It's not good enough to blame any one of them all the time, and the cause really needs to be identified. Every once in a while I would see a post about algae, and invariably there would be that 'you are feeding too much' post. Scroll up, and half the time the amount of feeding mentioned is already too low. >_< |
|
06/04/2015, 01:52 PM | #312 | |
Crazy Designer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winston-Salem NC, USA
Posts: 1,029
|
Just a Few Side Notes
Quote:
When I hear that someone is having issues with P and not N, I think that PERHAPS the ATS is nitrate limited and there are threads for that, primarily for people with skimmers that are dosing Vodka but ATS users can have the same problem. I had them when I tried vodka. As for waste exports, I think that if you had a good enough skimmer and plenty of GFO, you would not have to worry much about poo. [Of course you want to get rid of as much as you can. (repeat)] The reason that I say that is that I had tank with a well designed ATS and a popular version of a Jaubert sand bed with a plenum. As I have detailed in other threads, the solid waste was processed. I could see into the open water volume at the bottom of the tank that was stagnant. On the glass, I had placed a coated magnet so that I could move it around. In the first month there was a ¼ inch fine layer of gray dust like detritus that formed on the bottom. Eight years later that layer never got any thicker than that same ¼ inch. It had to be different dust. I was growing filter feeders. I put food in the tank daily that was measured in spoons and ½ cups, not cubes. The poo, un-used powdered foods, living and dead bacteria, fish foods, fish fertilizer and many other things went somewhere. Between my export and tank processes my N and P where hardly ever even detectible. I would suggest that food web processed it. Dr. Adey wrote a lot about this web in his book in the early 90’s. Recent studies are showing that the web is much bigger and more complicated than we thought and is still, little understood. |
|
06/05/2015, 11:09 AM | #313 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Gurabo, PR USA
Posts: 75
|
|
06/06/2015, 04:00 PM | #314 | |
greybeard
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MD
Posts: 893
|
Quote:
__________________
The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination. Albert Einstein Current Tank Info: 360 degree walk around 300 DD island–4 300W & 2 165W ViparSpectra, 4 Kessil A350W, 2 A360WE, 3 XF150, 1 XF250, 1 XF350 Gyre along with 2 PP40 and 2 IceCap 3K gyre for robust current. Basement 150 gallon RubberMaid sump, SKIMZ skimmer, DCP18000 |
|
06/24/2015, 09:24 PM | #315 | |||
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,941
|
Quote:
I use all NSW here is Southern California, have done so for nearly 30 years and only raise Alk slightly above it's typical value to 7.5 because I use KW to stabilize pH at night. SPS grow just fine and have very good color. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Skepticism is a method, not a position. It can be defined as a method of intellectual caution and suspended judgment." ~ Rich Ross |
|||
06/28/2015, 11:21 AM | #316 | |
Registered Member
|
Quote:
In some cases the phosphates bound up in rocks can support algae for 6 months or longer. If the rock is so bound up esp on the surface then it loses its effectiveness in providing a location for denitrifiers within its core In these cases I dump the reef rock and replace it with dry rock eg Florida key largo.
__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock |
|
07/02/2015, 03:18 PM | #317 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 633
|
Quote:
Last edited by hart24601; 07/02/2015 at 03:23 PM. |
|
07/03/2015, 07:08 AM | #318 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,479
|
Quote:
I know that some LED emitters in our fixtures can have a fairly high PAR and near zero PUR. So in a way, PAR meter readings need to be taken with a grain of salt. PAR meters can provide us with some very meaningful information and at the same time completely useless data. Hart24601 has a point. I dont think many of us are helping our corals one bit by blasting them with tons of light. Corals are amazingly adaptive and will do well under countless conditions (given time to adapt), have great colors and good growth. You can see that in some of the many tanks here that range for ULNS to high nutrient tanks and have lighting from very intense to what some would call low for the corals that they have. So...what to do? Maybe its moderate lighting for corals like SPS in the 300-400 PAR range with the appropriate spectrum of course? With higher light intensity than that I think most corals (not all) are/have just adapting to what we provide them. Last edited by Mark426; 07/03/2015 at 07:28 AM. |
|
07/03/2015, 10:31 AM | #319 |
Crazy Designer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winston-Salem NC, USA
Posts: 1,029
|
Most reefers run a fairly constant light level over a long day. 12 hours might be a typical day for many. Some tanks have a ramp up and ramp down period of 1 hour each but normally, the lights are on most of the day.
I have a weird theoretical question but I think that it is close to being on topic. !IF! you had a light that moved over a long tank as the day progressed, what kind of par would you want? What kind of intensity would the corals tolerate? Or, if you had extra lamps that you could turn on for only two or three hours, Or, if you could turn your LED’s way up for a short period of time, what kind of intensity would work well. Does anyone know how fast light levels rise and then fall off again in the ocean, only one or two feet deep? Lots of companies successfully grow corals in tanks that are several inches deep to only few feet deep, in full sun only. Despite the depth that these corals are typically collected, many of them grow quite well in depths that are similar to our tanks. I know that some indoor coral farmers use motorized light tracking but I think that they do it to save money over large areas. In a six foot tank for example, one lamp could easily be too strong, even when moved. The reason that I ask is because I plan on building an LED system that I can turn up and down as well as move over the tank during the day. In the past I built a moveable system for two 250 watt metal halides so I want to do it again. I am mainly doing it for cosmetic reasons, not for the corals. I just think that it will be more interesting to have the lighting change during the prime viewing hours. Never the less, I might be able to take advantage of this feature to grow better corals. So has anyone played with changing the intensity of the lights for the corals? |
07/13/2015, 01:34 PM | #320 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 585
|
__________________
Since May 2011: OLD: 57G rimless NOW: ELOS 120, DIY LED using reefll.com 12-up boards |
07/13/2015, 02:40 PM | #321 |
Crazy Designer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winston-Salem NC, USA
Posts: 1,029
|
Thank you
That is what I needed. |
07/14/2015, 06:00 PM | #322 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 613
|
I have read this thread several times, great information!
I am having problems with my sps and would appreciate suggestions: In January 2015 I started my new 150 gal Bare Bottom tank ( redsea max 650 aquarium with T5 Bulbs). my parameters in January were: Alk: 10.5, PO4:0 (hanna), NO3: 0 After 3 days my first frag bleached, and after 1 week several others bleached. 2 weeks later most lost the beautiful colors!. I had only 2 fish in the aquarium. After reading this thread ( April 2015), I realized that I had a lethal combination of high light, high ALK and almost no nutrients, so I lowered my ALK striving for Natural Sea Water levels and introduced 7 fish to higher the quantity of nutrients in the system. Right now I have the following parameters: Alk: 7.3, PO4:0 (Hanna), NO3: 0 Colors got better, but never really good, and I can not get my millis to have great polip extention. I had to travel out of town and the aquarium was given too much food and I guess there was a spike in ammonia levels resulting in a mini-cycle and the most of my fish died. I am back to 2 fish again. When I came back I tested ammonia and it was undetectable but one fish developed ich so I will not be able to get more fish inside until I treat the actual ones. Questions: 1.- Since I cannot get more fish in the tank for some time how do I keep the nutrients high for developing colorful healthy colors? 2.- How much and what should I feed my tank? As mentioned before I have only 2 fish so they do not consume much food 3.- Is it just a matter of nutrients in the system? Assuming ALK, MAG and CAL are with in range? 4.- Will the ammonia spike that I had affect my sps corals? I would appreciate your advice on how to get this tank in the right track Thanks again |
07/15/2015, 11:06 AM | #323 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 399
|
the secret to colorful,healthy corals....obvious to some,elusive to many
Feed more. Try some oyster smoothie or similar. You should have some algae visible. Get some snails to deal with that. Eventually you want more fish. High nutrient import and export is the key.
|
07/15/2015, 01:37 PM | #324 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Alsip, IL
Posts: 1,133
|
+1 I think this is where a lot of people go wrong. I might add target feeding corals with fresh and even live foods. I feed my lps and nps live worms and bbs. Sps gets live phyto and Reef Bugs for example. AWC`s keep nutrients low.
__________________
Four legs good. Two legs better. Current Tank Info: 50G SPS/NPS Reef, 120G Mixed Reef, 120G FOWRL, 29G Seahorse tank, 20G Observation tank, |
07/15/2015, 01:44 PM | #325 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dewitt MI
Posts: 5,051
|
Quote:
__________________
Gary 180 gallon, 40 gallon sump, 3 250 W MH + 4 80W ATI T5's, MTC MVX 36 Skimmer, Apex controller Aquamaxx T-3 CaRx Current Tank Info: A 2 Barred Rabbitfish, Red Head Salon, Yellow/Purple, McMaster Fairy, Possum, 2 Leopard Wrasses, Kole, & Atlantic Blue Tangs, 2 Percula Clown, 3 PJ and 1 Banggai Cardinalfish , Swallowtail, Bellus and Coral Beauty Angels |
|
|
|