Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 03/09/2012, 07:11 AM   #1
fishgate
Registered Member
 
fishgate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Damascus, MD
Posts: 3,340
Restricting pump flow - damages pump?

I am going to put a ball valve on the output of my mag-drive pump to restrict flow. Will this hurt the pump? Should I be diverting the flow instead with a 3 way outlet?


__________________
125RR in-wall, 40B Sump, CS180 BM Skimmer, ATI 4x80 watt, eheim 1262, custom wrap around rock wall, ReefKeeper Elite

120g in-wall, 40B Sump, PC 54wx4, Jabao DC-6000 (full siphon), future seahorse t

Current Tank Info: 125g, 120g, 2x40b sumps, ATI 4x80 T5HO
fishgate is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/09/2012, 07:15 AM   #2
bayoupr
Registered Member
 
bayoupr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,308
I have read that restricting the flow on the output is OK, but restricting the flow on the input of the pump is not good for the pump. I have been restricting my return pump flow for about two years on my present pump with no issues.


bayoupr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/09/2012, 07:17 AM   #3
chilwil84
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: down the shore
Posts: 780
above poster is correct, but greatly reducing it will result in increased noise


chilwil84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 12:02 AM   #4
nickjj
Premium Member
 
nickjj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The City of Waterfalls
Posts: 204
My understanding on restricting flow on a Mag pump is to use a T fitting with a ball valve to diverting the flow back into your sump. This way you are not creating any back pressure on the pump which can be hard on them. I found this image to help explain.


Attached Images
File Type: gif sump_fuge1.gif (12.9 KB, 177 views)
__________________
Nick
"Life is like a piece of live rock, you never know what you're gonna get inside....."

Current Tank Info: Innovative Marine Nuvo Fusion 40 - Fully Automated with Aquatronica Touch Controller
nickjj is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 12:16 AM   #5
Daimyo68
Registered Member
 
Daimyo68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 2,270
I restrict the output on my mag12 and it gets quieter. You can search my username for the question that I asked.

I used 1" return lines on my 75g, as this was more than enough using the Headloss Calculator. The issue I was having was when the ball valve was wide open, it sounded like the pump was cavitating, even though it is completely submersed in the water.

I couldn't figure it out and it was weird that on my 50g, using 3/4" return lines, it is wide open without any noise.

Turns out, without enough head pressure, the pump will be noisy. I turned the gate valve back to about 75% now, restricting the flow, and the pump is basically dead silent.


__________________
120g, 50g Sump, SRO XP2000i, MP40W x2, DIY Hybrid LED/T5 Fixture, Apex
PBMAS VP 2010-11
PBMAS 2017 President
Daimyo68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 12:24 AM   #6
needmore-reef
Registered Member
 
needmore-reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 425
Why not use an appropriately sized pump? Are use making use of a pump you already own?


needmore-reef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 06:58 AM   #7
atreis
Registered Member
 
atreis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Yellow Springs, OH
Posts: 942
There's no difference between restricting the flow by using a valve on the output and restricting the flow by having to pump the water higher. Both just increase the head pressure and won't damage the pump.

Restricting flow by putting a valve on the input can cause cavitation, which can damage the pump.


__________________
reef tank up since 8/2009. Previous tank up since 4/2004, taken down in 2007.

Current Tank Info: custom 100g reef, custom sump
atreis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 07:34 AM   #8
sbeason
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lake St Louis, MO
Posts: 1,391
Just follow the above posts......do not put a ball valve on the inlet, either put one on the outlet or t off and put some back into your fuge area or skimmer section.

-Steve


sbeason is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 08:46 AM   #9
emmanuel
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 179
I read somewhere that restricting the pump increases electric consumption (not sure if this holds for mag type pumps) even if this is falls the way energy prices are heading it would pay to downsize pump


emmanuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 09:59 PM   #10
CliftonArbogast
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Houston TX (south side)
Posts: 165
75% open will not hurt pump, you can get cavitation with going too low of a flow. Wont save money as pump has to make more pressure to get through restriction. If you need to cut back more than half i would downsize pump.


CliftonArbogast is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 10:02 PM   #11
Amdeus
Registered Member
 
Amdeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Virginia beach
Posts: 194
I would just divert it off the main. On a plus side you could also use that bypass feed to run a TLF/BRS reactor.


Amdeus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 11:15 PM   #12
kaipo13
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliftonArbogast View Post
75% open will not hurt pump, you can get cavitation with going too low of a flow. Wont save money as pump has to make more pressure to get through restriction. If you need to cut back more than half i would downsize pump.
You do not get cavitation from restricting the output of a pump, but from either not having enough flow through the pump(on the suction side,) or restricting the suction too much with a valve.


kaipo13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 11:36 PM   #13
daveydoodle
Registered Member
 
daveydoodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 120
I restricted or reduced a Mag 9 .5 and Mag 12 on freshwater tanks for several years and never had a problem. I decided to redirect some flow on a current Eheim 1262 I'm using now in saltwater. I think either way you're good. I put a gate valve on both the DT return line and the sump refugium return line so I can throttle either way. I like having the excess flow created in a little more power (moderately oversized) so I don't have to worry about not having "enough". I can always find somewhere to direct it.


daveydoodle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/10/2012, 11:42 PM   #14
das75
Registered Member
 
das75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 2,269
neat thing about restricting the outlet, as flow goes down, so does the power bill


__________________
.

Current Tank Info: 145g Starfire display (mixed reef) w/75g basement sump & 20g refugium, Barracuda return, Dart w/OM 4way CL, AI Hydras and Director.
das75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/11/2012, 06:36 AM   #15
emmanuel
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by das75 View Post
neat thing about restricting the outlet, as flow goes down, so does the power bill
I think you have that backwards


emmanuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/11/2012, 08:34 AM   #16
cordell
Registered Member
 
cordell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Monroe, LA
Posts: 655
If you think you might ever want to use any kind of reactor, as mentioned earlier, go ahead and T off the return line and with a couple ball valves, create a small manifold that you can use to plumb in the reactors.

You might eventually want to use calcium/carbon/gfo reactors (or add a fuge, or add another tank to your system, etc.) and this is the perfect opportunity to prepare for them for very little cost $$. Until you add reactors, the outlet from the manifold can be controlled by the valve on it and directed to flow back into the sump just below the water line so no splashing occurs.

As said already though, valve restriction is just like head pressure, so it shouldn't hurt the pump, to a point.


cordell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/11/2012, 12:34 PM   #17
das75
Registered Member
 
das75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 2,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by emmanuel View Post
I think you have that backwards
nope.

Example my Reeflo Barracuda full open 262 watts, where I normally run it valved back for reduced flow through the sump, 240 watts.


__________________
.

Current Tank Info: 145g Starfire display (mixed reef) w/75g basement sump & 20g refugium, Barracuda return, Dart w/OM 4way CL, AI Hydras and Director.
das75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/11/2012, 02:45 PM   #18
fishgate
Registered Member
 
fishgate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Damascus, MD
Posts: 3,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by needmore-reef View Post
Why not use an appropriately sized pump? Are use making use of a pump you already own?
This is an all new setup. I have the overflow rated at 300gph. Ideally, I'd like the return pump to be able to flow 300gph at the tank level. This means some amount higher than 300gph rating to get the proper flow into the tank. I will lose some pressure in the pipes, radius's and outlet not to mention losing something more as the pipes get growth inside them and as the pump ages. I think I will always need to have a ball valve to match the pump to the conditions and I don't see any way to have an "appropriately sized pump" unless I am ok with always running below the overflows rated capacity as I will always want my overflow to be at or greater than the return pumps flow capacity. So the next best solution is to get a pump rated higher and crank it down as needed. Which is what I am doing with my 700gph mag pump.


__________________
125RR in-wall, 40B Sump, CS180 BM Skimmer, ATI 4x80 watt, eheim 1262, custom wrap around rock wall, ReefKeeper Elite

120g in-wall, 40B Sump, PC 54wx4, Jabao DC-6000 (full siphon), future seahorse t

Current Tank Info: 125g, 120g, 2x40b sumps, ATI 4x80 T5HO
fishgate is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/11/2012, 07:41 PM   #19
James77
Registered Member
 
James77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by emmanuel View Post
I think you have that backwards
As the head increases, the pump is pumping less, therefore doing less work. So it generally- in most cases- uses less power.

I had a sicce syncra on a kill a watt, and could watch the watts go down the more I closed the ball valve. It went from its rated 47 watts down to 31 pretty easily.


__________________
Jim

Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef and 75g Freshwater
James77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/13/2012, 04:50 AM   #20
emmanuel
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 179
it must work different then on a magnet driven motor than a regular (wired motor) Because I saw a demo with a motor and a amp meter when a load was put on the motor the amps shot up.
thats why I stated "(not sure if this holds for mag type pumps)" in the above post thanks for the info


emmanuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/13/2012, 11:20 AM   #21
ganjero
saiperchémibatteilcorazon
 
ganjero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 4,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by emmanuel View Post
it must work different then on a magnet driven motor than a regular (wired motor) Because I saw a demo with a motor and a amp meter when a load was put on the motor the amps shot up.
thats why I stated "(not sure if this holds for mag type pumps)" in the above post thanks for the info
What kind of motor are you taking about?
If the motor has the capability to produce X amount of force constantly (to a limit), even if the “load” varies, then yes it will consume more energy to push/move a higher load. Just like a car engine, it can achieve x mph but the more weight the car has the more gas it will use to achieve that speed.

Most water pumps in this hobby will produce less GPH the higher the head pressure gets hence reducing the energy consumed.


ganjero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.