|
03/05/2018, 05:23 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Skimmer PO4 Removal Study
Here is a quick summary of data I collected on the phosphate content in skimmate produced in my DIY skimmer. I plotted the % of the system’s phosphate removed per hour against the volume of skimmate as a percent of the total volume of the system produced per hour. To clarify, a bit less than 2% of the system’s phosphate is removed per hour when the amount of collapsed foam produced per hour is 0.1% of the system’s total. My system is about 187 liters and PO4 level during the study was around 0.01 ppm. For aquarists doing daily 1% water changes by wet skimming are potentially removing a significant amount of phosphate.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
03/05/2018, 08:07 PM | #2 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
How are you measuring phosphate? Is this data from a total phosphate kit, or a standard orthophosphate test?
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
03/06/2018, 06:35 AM | #3 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
Here is an interesting observation. Holding the foamate solution at pH 3 for five minutes before neutralizing the solution and centrifugation (to clarify the foamate sample) increases the phosphate level. Ken Feldman thinks it might be a result of dissolving something inorganic like an insoluble salt or carbonate shell rather than hydrolysis of phosphate esters. The results are definitely a head scratcher given the way skimmers work. I don’t know what is actually being collected by the foam. Besides arsenic, I have not found any information on substances that would produce false positives. Still looking and listening though. I am tempted to purchase the Hach total phosphate kit. |
|
03/06/2018, 09:13 PM | #4 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
Fairly obviously, I am not sure why there's so much phosphate in the skimmate, either. Maybe there's enough decay happening, but that seems odd. I don't have enough chemistry background to comment on what the acid might be doing. I would have thought it was breaking down at least some organics, but maybe not.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
03/06/2018, 09:26 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 346
|
Used to perform environmental sampling all the time and we had to acidity sample to pH<2 with nitric acid. Not sure exactly why though. Maybe prevents conversion to orthophosphate? Maybe Randy can chime in?
|
03/07/2018, 05:09 AM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Euclid, OH
Posts: 4,281
|
The skimmer is taking in bacteria they die= release of phosphate
Skimmer takes in particles of food,waste, ect.......it breaks down= phosphate These are just my guesstimations of what happens I don't think anyone knows what is actually taken up at the point of reaction/frationation........it's all supposition and theory based on what the test numbers read. I know there is an article or two about bacteria counts but I think the value and conclusions are overstated in relation to how to run a reef tank. I'm curious why are you focusing on such minutiae? Other than for interest and conversation I don't see the value. Just for fun you should test the water before it goes to the skimmer and the water after........maybe that will give you more answers or more questions
__________________
80g Rimless Acropora System reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2197142&page=31 Ed |
03/07/2018, 05:48 AM | #7 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
As for breaking down organics, in this case hydrolysis of phosphate esters, it requires strong acid and high temperatures. This is not a rejection of breaking down organics idea, just saying that there is something more to investigate. |
|
03/07/2018, 05:52 AM | #8 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
|
|
03/07/2018, 06:55 AM | #9 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
I am uneasy about depending on water purification methods like a skimmer or GAC column that are currently impossible for us to assess how well they are performing. Relying on manufacturers recommendations does not necessarily help me. Since there is no transparency in how they came up with their recommendations, I cannot judge if a manufacturer's recommendations are relevant. Ken Feldman published a lot of information on skimmers in Advanced Aquarists, but even that amount of knowledge did little to convince me that I knew how well my skimmer were working. Hence, the study. Where the phosphate is coming from is a tough question to answer but skimmate collected over an hour and then immediately analyzed for phosphate shows a phosphate concentration much higher (20-100 X) than that of the aquarium water. Typically, my system has a 0 - 0.03 ppm phosphate level. This observation suggests, not proof, that something is being collected by the foam rather than bacterial metabolism or decay in the skimmate producing phosphate. As for comparing aquarium water to skimmer effluent, very little material is collected per second by a skimmer. The difference is undetectable and only over time does the skimmer remove measurable amounts of material. In skimmer theory jargon, the "recovery rate" for a skimmer attached to an aquarium is very low. |
|
03/07/2018, 01:53 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,515
|
It could be interesting to test the skimmer in a static environment like a bucket with a known volume and phosphate level and then check the phosphate level in the water over time. That would give you a measurable removal rate. You could also measure skimmate production and see how that relates to the phosphate level as it declines.
There would be some loss in efficiency as the phosphate level is reduced but at least you'd have some removal rates at various phosphate levels without having to measure the skimmate. .1% per hour sure seems like a lot of skimmate. Do many people run systems that wet?
__________________
Exodus 8:2 Check my homepage for tank pics and details. Current Tank Info: 90 gallon, 2x maxspect R420R LED, 4 Ocellaris Clowns, Yellow Eye Kole Tang, Flame Angel, Foxface Rabbitfish, Banggai Cardinals, Azure Damsel, rock flower anemone, cleaner shrimp, serpent star |
03/07/2018, 05:59 PM | #11 | ||
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
Quote:
I did something like this with a GAC column. May try it with a skimmer. Quote:
|
||
03/07/2018, 07:22 PM | #12 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,515
|
Quote:
__________________
Exodus 8:2 Check my homepage for tank pics and details. Current Tank Info: 90 gallon, 2x maxspect R420R LED, 4 Ocellaris Clowns, Yellow Eye Kole Tang, Flame Angel, Foxface Rabbitfish, Banggai Cardinals, Azure Damsel, rock flower anemone, cleaner shrimp, serpent star |
|
03/07/2018, 07:49 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
I haven’t automated this. I replace the skimmate volume with new salt water twice a day when I measure the skimmate volume at 6 AM and 5 PM. After the salt water is replaced, I evaluate fresh water replacement need, which is about a gallon per day in the winter. I am not sure how you would automate both types of water replacements.
|
03/08/2018, 12:18 AM | #14 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,515
|
Quote:
__________________
Exodus 8:2 Check my homepage for tank pics and details. Current Tank Info: 90 gallon, 2x maxspect R420R LED, 4 Ocellaris Clowns, Yellow Eye Kole Tang, Flame Angel, Foxface Rabbitfish, Banggai Cardinals, Azure Damsel, rock flower anemone, cleaner shrimp, serpent star |
|
03/08/2018, 01:25 AM | #15 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 104
|
I love your study. Not being a chemist/biologist/scientist, I can’t comment on your studies validity. But I think it is fantastic that a hobbyist is injecting some quantifiable science into our shared passion. Far too much of the information in our hobby is based on anecdotal evidence, which is the weakest form of knowledge. Thumbs up!!!
|
03/08/2018, 02:29 AM | #16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
|
03/09/2018, 08:53 AM | #17 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sterling
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Was just reading through your post, interesting find Just a heads up on someone who uses hach equipment daily. Our business has just about every colorimiter they make. Imo they are awesome and worth ever penny since we have some of the old series 1 units still in use after 20 years of beeing dragged all over creation. If you decide to take the plunge I'd highly recommend the DR900 for the price difference as there are many many more uses. The other brand we use regularly is lamontte these have also been is use for 20+ years (we have of 1200 series) and their worth their weight in gold We always keep two of any type test to verify results and use these two brands interchangeable and to verify each other. As a side note I don't work for or receive any compensation from hach or lamontte I've just used their products and find them reliable. Sometimes you can find either of these kits on places like eBay for a good deal if your up for a gamble btw. Good luck!! Keep looking for those answers! Sent from my E6810 using Tapatalk |
|
03/09/2018, 11:35 AM | #18 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,432
|
|
03/09/2018, 12:12 PM | #19 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sterling
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
Sent from my E6810 using Tapatalk |
|
09/19/2018, 10:03 AM | #20 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chestnut Ridge, NY
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
I see that the DR900 can handle a number of typical aquarium chemistry tests. Can you give me some guidance for my questions below? Hardness Calcium & Magnesium - Does this single test really give me usable results for both calcium and magnesium? Nitrate - 3 possible methods. Any observations on which methods are simplest, fastest, cheapest, etc? Which are most appropriate for low range testing we want to see in a reef aquarium? Phosphate - Almost a dozen methods. Same questions as for nitrate. Alkalinity - No methods to test alkalinity. I guess I would stick with my Hanna alkalinity tester. There are methods available for other water parameters that some people seem to be concerned with at times, though I have never tested for them: Iron, Dissolved Oxygen, Copper.... Regarding Hach's digital titrator as a supplement or alternative.... Any thoughts? This could be my Hach alternative to my Hanna alkalinity tester. I would think the digital titrator would be much more accurate than adding drops with a 1 ml syringe typical to the commonly available test kits. All I would have to do is transfer the appropriate titrating reagent from my Red Sea kit to a clean, empty cartridge to attach to the digital titrator. The digital titrator is probably cheaper than going the DR900 route, and could be used for any typical color-change test kits that depend on measuring the number of milliliters of reagent required to cause a color-change. It's just that the DR900 seems so much more attractive in removing the subjectivity of how my eyes evaluate color changes and differences! Any thoughts you can share would be appreciated! |
|
09/19/2018, 12:30 PM | #21 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
The nitrate method might work. One of the phosphate methods might be fine, although it'd likely require recalibration if it's low-range. The hardness won't be useful. It at best will give a sump of the calcium and magnesium, but the level in tank water probably is far out of range of the kit. That device is largely for freshwater testing. There are companies working on sensors for saltwater systems, but I haven't seen a lot of reviews yet.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
|
|