|
05/22/2013, 12:05 PM | #51 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Humble, Texas
Posts: 199
|
Thanks for all the info posted here. I've been tossing around the idea of doing something similar on my 90gallon. I am thinking about dripping the diluted LC into the intake of a MJ400 that feeds into a TLF-150 reactor (with or without floss), and then putting the output of the reactor into a 10micron filter sock. Seems like the floss in the reactor might be an improvement over my original thought of an empty reactor used only as a mixing chamber. I'll be tagging along trying to learn here.
|
05/22/2013, 02:13 PM | #52 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
No problem. I really like the results that I am seeing with this way for Phosphate export. It sill may need tweaks here and there, but I think this method is certainly on the right track!
Moderation is key IMO. If you were going to feed the reactor to anything, you may want to consider your skimmer. Then if possible, you can have your skimmer outflow into the filter sock. If I felt that I needed further precip capture, then that's what I would do. Although at this point, I do not feel it to be necessary. I believe that the true risk is not the bonded phosphates escaping into your water column, but rather the un-reacted LaCl3. It's my goal to avoid overdosage at all times. I never want to see my phosphates close to undetectable. |
05/23/2013, 09:07 AM | #53 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,772
|
Quote:
At the time my total system volume was likely between 100 -125 gallons. 75g Display - rock/sand = maybe 70g ~8g skimmer ~30g at sump operating level. Phosphates were as high as 1ppm (no kidding) and dosing took them down as low as .04 ppm. I never dosed more than 2ml a day (that I can remember) and those loarge doses were in the begining and reduced as po4 came down. As I mentioned on my site, when I stopped dosing, po4 would QUICKLY (a day or three) rise right back up to .8 or so. In an attempt to avoid the large doses and large swings, I started dosing much smaller doses (.1ml at a time) several times a day when I walked past the tank. Phosphate hovered between .1 and .08 for most of that time and that is when the Tang started to look bad, and eventually (after a dosing break maybe two weeks) died. To be clear: I did not dilute the lanthanum chloride before dosing into the skimmer. I had intentioned of dosing the 1ml (or less) over 24hour period by mixing it with the top off water (fed into the magnum/skimmer/sock setup) but never got around to it by the time the Tang died. I stopped dosing and focused on a change in methodology. Replacement of Lacl3 with other methods:
Do I think the LaCl3 is viable? Not sure. It certainly helped to export piles of brown phosphate slime but I managed to kill a fish with it (at least basic evidence points to that). So short term it was great. Long term, I am not sure and may have pushed the envelope with my dosing methodology. Joe Yaiullo doses a rather small amount through a hage sand filter and (last I checked) had not reported adverse effects. Your methodology may be promising. |
|
05/23/2013, 09:33 AM | #54 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Humble, Texas
Posts: 199
|
|
05/23/2013, 09:40 AM | #55 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,258
|
wondering out loud if a canister filter with a lot of floss would be a suitable place to dose into and catch the precipitate..
|
05/23/2013, 09:52 AM | #56 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
|
05/23/2013, 09:54 AM | #57 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
I would imagine that this would be similar to using a reactor. Although I do feel that you would want to agitate/mix the LaCl3 with as much water as possible before it gets to the floss. This is why I still keep my first reactor in play.
Im certainly not sure that it is necessary, but it works so well as it is, im not about to change it. Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 10:05 AM | #58 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
Thanks for the reply. You definitely had a whole lot of phosphates! I wonder if it also had something to do with the very large and rapid reduction that you were making? I recall reading something about adverse affects on livestock from a large phosphate reduction. Something like, .1 change. I'll have to go search around and see If I can find it.
In any case, this information is very important. I will definitely keep a close eye on my tank and post any feedback or findings along the way. Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 10:35 AM | #59 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,772
|
Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 10:37 AM | #60 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,772
|
Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 10:41 AM | #61 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,258
|
Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 10:48 AM | #62 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,772
|
Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 10:54 AM | #63 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
I've been treating a 35g tub this way in preparation for a larger tank. If you have the time and footprint to do this, it just doesn't make any sense not to.
Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 11:02 AM | #64 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,258
|
Quote:
|
|
05/23/2013, 11:23 AM | #65 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 20,772
|
I am not sure what I stand on that whole matter.... Part of me wants to blame the dry base rock I used to set the system up with but I did not have known issues (I never tested for phosphate) for maybe 5-6 years when things went to crap...
Then again, my feeding was not what we would consider even close to being moderate, and for a time of maybe 2 years I pretty much neglected ALL maintenance because everything was thriving. So did I plant the ticking time bomb with the dry base rock, or build it over time? Who knows, maybe both. |
05/23/2013, 05:08 PM | #66 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 266
|
I made a reactor similar to Insomniac, used a very diluted (50 to 1) solution that I fed through a dosing pump at 5 cc's per/hour. My reaction chamber was 20 inches deep and the flow rate was about 250 litres/hour.
I saw PO4 drop slowly over 3 weeks from 22 PPB (Hanna Ultral low test) to 9 PPB. Once I got to this point of vanishingly low PO4 I began to notice some adverse effects on fish and coral. I dont think it was the low PO4 that did this, because I can easily achieve this level with GFO with no visible adverse effects. But I suspect that even at my low dose rates, with very little PO4 to get rid of, there was some free LaCl2 getting past the filter wool and into the Tank, whereas any La PO4 precipitate was getting removed. I am now modifying my reactor to incorporate a second chamber with will be 50/50 filter wool and GAC, hopefully will capture any free La Cl2 in the Carbon. Also, I will experiment with dose rates to see what dilution I need to maintain just enough LaCl2 going into the system to maintain a low PO4, but minimalising the potential for free La Cl2 to cross over into the DT I think the La Cl2 method of PO4 removal has a lot of promise, but there is a way to go before it is foolproof !! |
05/23/2013, 07:39 PM | #67 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
From my experience thus far, I believe that your dose was very high. To make the comparison to my dosage and dose rate:
I use CR version. If I compare my dosage to yours. I dose at 570 to 1 @ 5ML/CC an hour. At that rate, and your already low phosphate level, you definitely flooded a lot of LaCl3 into your tank. If you read up on my posts, you will see that I have a second stage that im using compacted ROX carbon. At first I didnt think I like it. But now I find it to be polishing my tank well. I also see much darker filter floss now. On a side note. I decided to do a little experiment. When my tank got to .07 PPM, I decided to stop administering LaCl3 for 3 days, and keep my flow through my reactor. I noticed no change in filter floss coloring, but after 3 days, my phosphates rose almost exactly what I anticipated they would. I had calculated that my maintenance dose would keep my levels @ or very near .07. Double my maintenance dose, made my phosphates drop .01 every 2 days. My new phosphate level is .11 . I'm now resuming my maintenance dose to see if i can keep that number where it is at. I will check in 3 days. I've posted it a bit back, but my maintenance dose is about 2.5 CC/ML an hour at the same dilution rate of around 570 to 1 -or- 20ML of CR version(66% dilute) per gallon. Last edited by insomniac2k2; 05/23/2013 at 07:46 PM. |
05/23/2013, 07:44 PM | #68 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
I also just checked my alkalinity. I have to disclaim that I am knowingly skewing my results due to adding a healthy amount of vinegar to my kalk stirrer (in a similar fashion to how im doing LC).
My ALK is actually going up gradually since adding vinegar direct into my reactor, due to the extra kalk saturation. I have no metric to tell if my DKH is slowing due to LC more than otherwise. The only thing that I can say is that I have always been near 11dkh. Im presently 11.2 (which I might add is supposed to be a no-no when carbon dosing, according to some). For now, I feel that as long as I control my dose rate as I am now, I will not see a loss in alkalinity like others have seen. |
05/23/2013, 10:05 PM | #69 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 266
|
Yep...it appears that my dilution was way off. I will continue to experiment and drop down to something near your 500 ish :1.
At my original dilution I calculated that I was putting 2.4 cc per day of La Cl2 through the reactor, which I felt would not present an issue in my 1000 litere system (represents an addition of 2.4 PPM,) as this amount should be fully reacted...but maybe I was somewhat optimistic and some free La Cl2 was getting through.. Next step for me is to finish construction of the stage 2 reactor (using filter wool and GAC same as you and try again with much lower dilution. I have my own views that I want to target a much lower Po4 level than you, I am after less than 5 PPB (or 0.015 PPM)...that's a matter of individual choice BTW, in 3 weeks of dosing La Cl2 I did not notice any change in KH, then again, I keep my DT at 7.6 to 8.0 which is identical to the NSW that I use for W/C. There may be more effect at higher KH levels ?? |
05/23/2013, 10:24 PM | #70 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
260g is certainly a lot more water volume than what I have, but my gut tells me that the dosage is definitely going to be the most important factor. I would imagine that if you go with that 500 to 1 dosage @ say 10cc an hour would probably be a great start. Especially if you can spread it out in the smallest possible doses. I believe you said you are dripping?
May I ask why you would possibly want to be that low? I would fear that the LaCl3 wouldn't effectively find the free phosphates in the reactor with such low levels. Last edited by insomniac2k2; 05/23/2013 at 10:31 PM. |
05/23/2013, 11:41 PM | #71 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Marshalltown, IA
Posts: 841
|
Insomniac,
I have a couple questions if I may. I believe my DT has about 120g TWV. To confirm, you are using SeaClear "CR"? You mix 1ml SeaClear CR into 190ml RO/DI? I'd love to set my dosing up like yours with the reactors but this isn't possible for me I plan to dose via my overflow into a 5 micron filter sock which is located in my skimmer section. Also, I am going to try to use a 5 micron sock at the skimmer output to catch any LaC13 which may not be skimmed out(haven't yet figured it out but I'm confident that I can). Do you have any suggestions?
__________________
Happy Reefing!! :) Current Tank Info: 180g mixed 40B Anemone 5' raceway frag tank |
05/24/2013, 02:01 AM | #72 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
I recognise your concern with low,low levels of PO4 not being scavenged effectively, that is why I used a long reactor and a modest flow rate, so as to get the dwell time as high as possible. I chase ultra low levels because there is no PO4 or nitrates detectable in my NSW...and that's where my corals live !!! I definitely see much improved PE and colour with these ultra low levels...but then again, it's a personal choice |
|
05/24/2013, 07:36 AM | #73 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
Yes I use cr. 190ml to 1 is correct. This also translates to 20ml LaCl3 "cr" to 1g RODI.
I'm not sure that I would do it this way, but there is probably a lot of good resources at Gary's thread. In short, I do not believe that the excess LaCl3 will be caught by the filter sock. I believe that the only time that anything can be mechanically filtered out is after phosphates are bound. This is the key reason that I dump mine direct into my skimmer even after my double reactor with floss and carbon. And I mean direct. My skimmer has the highest concentration of accumulated junk in my tank. I believe that if anything is going to pick up the excess LaCl3, this is the place. This is why it is so important to have a very controlled contact area. I believe that Boomer gave some specifics on micron size in the LC thread. If you haven't read up on that already, you may want to check it out. Quote:
|
|
05/24/2013, 07:43 AM | #74 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: concord
Posts: 1,280
|
Have you read the sheet to insure that there is no other substances in the concentrate? I have read where others have tried other brands and have had a very bad experience, do to it having other stuff in the mixture (like anti-algae chemicals, etc).
I would hate for that to happen to you. Quote:
|
|
05/24/2013, 07:15 PM | #75 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Marshalltown, IA
Posts: 841
|
Quote:
I hope that manufacturers are considering a similar or your design as it sure would help us female non-DIYer's. Thanks again!!
__________________
Happy Reefing!! :) Current Tank Info: 180g mixed 40B Anemone 5' raceway frag tank |
|
Tags |
dosing, filter floss, lacl3, lanthanum chloride, phosphate |
|
|