|
12/20/2017, 06:46 PM | #26 |
Registered Member
|
1.2-2 pounds of live rock per gallon solves everything!
__________________
Originally posted by yellowslayer13: "I hate that hole" Current Tank Info: SCMAS Member 225 peninsula euroreef RS180 Apex 400W X 3 20k radiums / Spectra mixed SPS |
12/20/2017, 11:58 PM | #27 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 181
|
No it doesn’t. Getting rid of the sand helps more.
__________________
www.sustainablereefsolutions.com Current Tank Info: 200G (RS XXL 750) Mixed Reef, Kessil AP700 & A360WEx2, T5x4, Vortech MP40, Gyre XF250, Lifereef SVS2-24, Apex Jr, DOS |
12/21/2017, 10:42 AM | #28 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 705
|
|
12/21/2017, 10:45 AM | #29 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
There are lots of threads on this, and i've observed it in my tank several times over. Search for "dosing nitrates to reduce phosphates". |
|
12/21/2017, 12:02 PM | #30 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 181
|
Sand traps organic matter which then breaks down and increases nutrient levels.
I went from 30 NO3 to 1 over a couple months by just getting rid of the sand bed.
__________________
www.sustainablereefsolutions.com Current Tank Info: 200G (RS XXL 750) Mixed Reef, Kessil AP700 & A360WEx2, T5x4, Vortech MP40, Gyre XF250, Lifereef SVS2-24, Apex Jr, DOS |
12/21/2017, 01:08 PM | #31 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 705
|
I know that argument, but to say that its going to solve this problem makes a lot of assumptions, a lot of which are unsupported thus far in the conversation.
I have a sand bed and have to dose nitrates and phosphates so I have some nutrients in my 18 month old system. I also have to feed like crazy. If I dont dose every other day, my nutrients drop to 0. So how would removing this sand bed solve the OP's phosphate problem? Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
__________________
Tony |
12/21/2017, 05:35 PM | #32 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
He is probably adding too much food and other crap to his tank. Phosphate level will go sky high before the nitrate has a chance to catch up. It might also be coming from his water supply.
__________________
www.sustainablereefsolutions.com Current Tank Info: 200G (RS XXL 750) Mixed Reef, Kessil AP700 & A360WEx2, T5x4, Vortech MP40, Gyre XF250, Lifereef SVS2-24, Apex Jr, DOS Last edited by ERIC85854; 12/21/2017 at 05:59 PM. |
|
12/21/2017, 05:39 PM | #33 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I ran a tank with a coarse substrate (crushed coral) for a while. The crushed coral seemed to trap organic debris, which then decayed and released mineralized nutrients, phosphate, and nitrate, into the water column. Replacing the substrate with very fine sand fixed that problem. Even a coarser grade of sand can trap a lot of debris, and I suspect a sufficient organic load can contaminate even very fine sand. What happens in any specific tank will tank some examination and thought to understand. I don't think there are any guarantees that you can make without looking at the substrate in question.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
12/21/2017, 06:10 PM | #34 |
In Memoriam
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
|
Phosphates
Definitely not sand as it’s only about half inch deep and it was caribalive punk fiji.
Also I never had po3 above 5, even after cycle, it is always high po4. I’ll prolly run some gfo and reduce feedings since I did feed heavy and go from there. I like running high nutrients but just wasn’t sure if too high of po4 will rtn my sps, as I have lost some, but typically a few days after a delivery from wwc and usually only 1 our if the bunch. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by Pslreefer; 12/21/2017 at 06:17 PM. |
12/21/2017, 06:22 PM | #35 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
__________________
www.sustainablereefsolutions.com Current Tank Info: 200G (RS XXL 750) Mixed Reef, Kessil AP700 & A360WEx2, T5x4, Vortech MP40, Gyre XF250, Lifereef SVS2-24, Apex Jr, DOS |
|
12/21/2017, 07:31 PM | #36 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
Part of the confusion comes from a paper referenced by Randy Holmes-Farley that found very low levels of bisphosphonate inhibited calcification. More recent research found "Bisphosphonate has been considered to inhibit calcification but not photosynthesis in corals. We show that bisphosphonate may not inhibit formation of amorphous calcium carbonate and that the inhibition of calcification is possibly illusory" Research that's been around for a long time but overlooked or ignored by many is PO4 levels on reefs on average are .13 mg/l and upwelling can raise PO4 levels to as high as 2.0 mg/l. Here's a good video discussing PO4 levels in aquariums by Richard Ross from the Stienhart Aquarium in CA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRIKW-9d2xI
Phosphate is critical for corals if they are not being fed and their ability to use nitrogen is limited by it's availability. And research by Southampton University in England found PO4 deficiency reduced coral biomass and promoted bleaching.
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
12/22/2017, 12:38 AM | #37 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 705
|
Quote:
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
__________________
Tony |
|
12/22/2017, 01:25 AM | #38 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 12
|
GFO is a very good idea, although i haven't tested on my tank. I have 5000 Gallon fish only tank which has been converted to reef recently. My phosphate levels are about 1.2ppm and have been running for almost 5 months. I have a refugium which has given me some good results. It will still go low slowly.
|
12/28/2017, 09:14 AM | #39 |
In Memoriam
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
|
Happy to report after my 4 day trip to the parents for Christmas I came back to find the po4 down to .5! With this info I feel I can let it come down naturally through export from my cheato and filter feeders in the cryptic sump and less feeding.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12/28/2017, 09:28 AM | #40 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
__________________
www.sustainablereefsolutions.com Current Tank Info: 200G (RS XXL 750) Mixed Reef, Kessil AP700 & A360WEx2, T5x4, Vortech MP40, Gyre XF250, Lifereef SVS2-24, Apex Jr, DOS |
|
12/28/2017, 12:49 PM | #41 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
Less feeding often is the easiest solution to nutrient problems. Fish can be very good at begging.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
12/28/2017, 01:13 PM | #42 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 2,621
|
Inorganic phosphate is what your test kit reads. I have no idea if there is an absolute number that is too high for SPS corals... BUT... IMO... keeping phosphates at about .05 ppm as reported by a good Ultra Low Range Colorimeter is preferable. I have too much time on my hands right now so here's the thought process that yielded my preference.
IMO, it is safe to say that some inorganic phosphate is necessary for biological functions. Again IMO, excessive inorganic phosphate can cause problems such as algae outbreaks. I'm not a biologist so I don't "know" how much is required. The level where necessary becomes excessive is obviously debatable. Some corals can get the phosphate they need from organics and bacteria they feed on. The organics and bacteria contain phosphates that your test kit doesn't count. Their formation or propagation reduces inorganic phosphate. I suppose some corals or their symbiotic algae may need to uptake (absorb) some inorganic phosphate directly. I think that even low levels of inorganic phosphate indicate that there is more than enough available. It means that all the organic compounds that can form have been formed and that all the needs for inorganic phosphate of the corals and other organisms in the system have been met. I also suppose that some necessary biological activities might be limited if inorganic phosphate levels are 0. The colorimeters I use has an accuracy of about .04 ppm. I want to make sure there is some inorganic phosphate, so I shoot for .05 ppm. That gets me in the range of .01 to .09 ppm.
__________________
John, Current Tank Info: In-process, 90 Gallon SPS Reef |
12/29/2017, 08:55 AM | #43 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
FWI you PO4 level is in the range of normal for reef systems. Be very careful about lowering PO4. It's essential for corals and too low really screws up a reef system potentially giving algae the upper hand as it can out compete corals for phosphate. Watch Richard Ross's video and look at this paper on the effect of phosphate deficiency on corals grown in aquariums for several years.
Additionally there is contradictory research on the effect of bisphosphanate on corals growth and it's effects on calcification. "We show that bisphosphonate may not inhibit formation of amorphous calcium carbonate and that the inhibition of calcification is possibly illusory"
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
12/29/2017, 05:14 PM | #44 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I agree that it's worth being careful with the phosphate level. Overdoing GFO seems to be able to cause problems. I don't think it's necessary to have measurable phosphate in a tank, but having a bit showing up on a meter is a good sign that phosphate isn't dangerously low.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
12/29/2017, 08:58 PM | #45 |
In Memoriam
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
|
Agreed. I like a higher nutrient tank, as I’m a believer that it is better for overall health, growth, and color of corals, then an ulns system.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12/29/2017, 09:08 PM | #46 |
In Memoriam
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
|
I was/am just unsure of how high is actually too high.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12/29/2017, 10:00 PM | #47 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
I think we all are. The issue seems to get less and less clear over time.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
12/31/2017, 08:17 AM | #48 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
|
My own experience I've seen many corals seem very happy at 5.0 mg/l PO4.
DO NOT TAKE THIS AS AN ENDORSMENT ON MY PART TO KEEP PO4 AT THIS LEVEL. THE AVERAGE ON REEFS IS .13 MG/L. But having kept the same corals for decades we need to expect each species, genotype and variety to react differently to the same conditions. And since corals have demonstrated "memory" for environmental conditions we need to take into account the history of a clone line as well. And yes I know currently this unrealistic. I think part of the reason for the confusion about PO4 is decades ago it was assumed the typical reef had much lower levels than what we now know they do. Both Adey and Holes-Farley referenced sources that gave a typical reef PO4 at .003 mg/l when we now know it's actually much higher. A second problem shown by research at Southampton Univerisity in England (linked to above) is the RATIO of nitrate to phosphate is important and an imbalance promotes bleaching. With varying levels in our systems we don't know what this ratio is so a given PO4 level for one aquarist MIGHT be a problem for another aquarist.
__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek |
12/31/2017, 11:45 AM | #49 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 2,621
|
What do SPScorals do at .13 ppm or higher of phosphate that they can't do at .03 ppm? I suppose .13 isn't that high, but I'd be uncomfortable keeping my tank any higher. It may or may not effect the corals but it does promote pest algae.
__________________
John, Current Tank Info: In-process, 90 Gallon SPS Reef |
12/31/2017, 01:31 PM | #50 |
RC Mod
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
|
Higher levels of phosphate might inhibit calcification, but that's not clear. There is some evidence that it might, and other evidence that it doesn't. I would watch the corals, and change things only when growth or coloration need improvement, whatever the conditions are, most likely, although I have a basic bias towards keeping the phosphate level low, down near a measured zero on hobbyist test equipment. Too low apparently can be bad, though, so I try not to be pedantic about it.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni |
|
|