Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 12/21/2017, 08:52 AM   #1
flawedexistence
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 46
Conflicting dKH tests

Newbie here! I have a 75 gal display tank with dry rock, a 33 gallon trigger sump with .25lb Chaeto in the refuge section. Simplicity skimmer running during current cycle. The tank is nearing the end of it's first cycle with nitrite level at 0.1. I have been using Red Sea and Salifert test kits. parameters are as follows:

dKH=9-10 Red Sea test kit
Mg=1400 Red Sea test kit
Ca=425 Red Sea test kit

After running the Red Sea dKH test a few times, I wanted to try an easier testing method so I bought a Hanna Checker. Ran the test twice and got dKH readings of 6.7 and 6.8. Any thoughts on why the big difference in readings and what to do about it?


flawedexistence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2017, 08:58 AM   #2
Rover88
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 590
Watch a youtube video on how to do each test. I was doing red sea tests in a way that wasn't entirely accurate.

Also, with the Hannah Checker did you hold the button for the second vial to give it the three minute countdown?


Rover88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2017, 09:11 AM   #3
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
What salt mix are you using?

Are you sure you are using/reading the syringe properly?.. you go by the plunger (bottom of the cylinder) and not the fluid level when reading it..
So the plunger may be at 1.0mL but the fluid only a .8mL.. you have 1mL of liquid and not .8mL

But yes.. try the videos to ensure you are doing it right and also post the salt mix you are using... They all state their "as freshly mixed" values so you should be able to compare to that too..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2017, 10:20 AM   #4
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Don't consider .1 a big diff with regard to the Hanna readings. I've often seen a .1 or even .2 difference when doing tests back to back. Many reasons this could occur, all have to do with testing errors. Slight volume diff in the plunger and/or water volume, or dirty testing vial.

As for the 3 min count down, never heard of this nor is it depicted in the Hanna instructions nor videos.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2017, 10:24 AM   #5
nereefpat
Registered Member
 
nereefpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Central Nebraska
Posts: 3,190
I believe OP is talking about the difference between the Hannah reading of 6.7/6.8 and the Red Sea reading of 9-10.

Since this tank is new, and there shouldn't be much alk demand, and freshly mixed saltwater should be closer to the 9-10 dKH range, I would suspect testing error with the Hannah Checker. I haven't used Hannah checkers, so I can't help further than that.


__________________
Pat

Current Tank Info: 125 in-wall , 40b sump. 6 bulb T5. ASM G2 skimmer. LPS and leathers
nereefpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2017, 10:28 AM   #6
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by nereefpat View Post
I believe OP is talking about the difference between the Hannah reading of 6.7/6.8 and the Red Sea reading of 9-10.

Since this tank is new, and there shouldn't be much alk demand, and freshly mixed saltwater should be closer to the 9-10 dKH range, I would suspect testing error with the Hannah Checker. I haven't used Hannah checkers, so I can't help further than that.
With that regard I agree. I've seen big differences between the Red Sea and Hanna results. I never paid it much attention because both readings were within recommended parameters.

I only use the Red Sea for magnesium now since the Hanna are much simpler and faster.

Maybe there is an explanation out there for why they vary so much.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2017, 10:30 AM   #7
pisanoal
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobZilla04 View Post
Don't consider .1 a big diff with regard to the Hanna readings. I've often seen a .1 or even .2 difference when doing tests back to back. Many reasons this could occur, all have to do with testing errors. Slight volume diff in the plunger and/or water volume, or dirty testing vial.

As for the 3 min count down, never heard of this nor is it depicted in the Hanna instructions nor videos.
There is a 3 minute waiting period for the ULR phosphorous checker. Mix for 2 minutes, let sit for 3 then test.

The alk, as you said, is instantaneous.


pisanoal is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2017, 05:35 PM   #8
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
I agree with making sure that you're using each test kit correctly. That difference is large enough to be an issue. I'm not sure which result is more accurate. If checking the video and instructions carefully doesn't clear up the issue, you might need to get a third opinion.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/22/2017, 03:03 PM   #9
flawedexistence
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 46
Thanks. I'll be rechecking my techniques.


flawedexistence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/22/2017, 03:36 PM   #10
hkgar
Registered Member
 
hkgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dewitt MI
Posts: 5,051
I primarily use the Hanna checker and periodically cross check, mainly if I get a reading that I question, with my Salifert kit. They are usually within .1 or .2 two of each other and when there was a big variance between the two I retested with the Hanna and it was within .1. Operator error.

I trust the Hanna to be about as accurate as you can get with hobby grade equipment.


__________________
Gary


180 gallon, 40 gallon sump, 3 250 W MH + 4 80W ATI T5's, MTC MVX 36 Skimmer, Apex controller Aquamaxx T-3 CaRx

Current Tank Info: A 2 Barred Rabbitfish, Red Head Salon, Yellow/Purple, McMaster Fairy, Possum, 2 Leopard Wrasses, Kole, & Atlantic Blue Tangs, 2 Percula Clown, 3 PJ and 1 Banggai Cardinalfish , Swallowtail, Bellus and Coral Beauty Angels
hkgar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/27/2017, 01:05 PM   #11
ecam
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 57
I prefer salifert. It used to come with a ref check. Hanna is to flimsy based on how u preform the test


ecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/29/2017, 11:55 AM   #12
flawedexistence
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 46
Update!

After checking my technique and springing for a LaMotte test kit, I am getting the following readings:

Hanna Checker: 8.9 dKH
LaMotte: 10.64 dKH
Red Sea: 10 dKH

These readings would seem to be within a reasonable margin of error for hobby test kits. If averaged, I get about 9.8 dKH which is just fine. I consider the problem solved and really appreciate the suggestions form the veterans on this thread. Thanks again!


flawedexistence is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/29/2017, 03:21 PM   #13
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
I agree that those numbers are close enough for hobbyist kits. I'd consider the problem solved.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/30/2017, 07:21 AM   #14
Timfish
Registered Member
 
Timfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,985
I'm not surprised. I got a Hanna checker and tested it against a friends. Using my new and thier 6 month old reagent and the same sample of water pulled from the top middle of the tank we got 4 different results that varied by .9 dKH (~.5 dKH with the same reagent). I think APIs Alk test is far easier and may be more accurate if the sample is doubled then divided by 2 (or trippled then divided by 3)


__________________
"Our crystal clear aquaria come nowhere close to the nutrient loads that swirl around natural reefs" Charles Delbeek
Timfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/30/2017, 12:11 PM   #15
bdsage
Registered Member
 
bdsage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 265
I use API with a 1ml syringe and multiply reagent used by 26.4 confirmed by a NSW standard. I find this to be ''good enough'' and very inexpensive.


__________________
Easy does it...

Current Tank Info: 40b. sps, Metal Halide,big skimmer,lots of flow, barebottom, natural seawater.
bdsage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.