Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 12/17/2011, 07:18 PM   #101
reefrad
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 134
it doesnt make sense to use well water as the whole idea is to remove phosphates from the rock. i would use ro/di salt water and forego swapping the water. this is what i did and so far so good. using water that isnt ro/di is how the damn phosphates got locked in the rock in the first place...


reefrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/17/2011, 08:48 PM   #102
maysorum
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mount Horeb
Posts: 279
Blog Entries: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
Im just going to go ahead and use well water, i dont think it will cause problems.
Hmm, do you know the TDS of your well water? Mine is very high, 683.


__________________
-------------------------
MAY
-------------------------
maysorum is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/17/2011, 08:49 PM   #103
Danzig
Registered Member
 
Danzig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefrad View Post
it doesnt make sense to use well water as the whole idea is to remove phosphates from the rock. i would use ro/di salt water and forego swapping the water. this is what i did and so far so good. using water that isnt ro/di is how the damn phosphates got locked in the rock in the first place...
nice attitude there cheif, chill out. I will test my well water phosphates right now. Even if there is phosphates in it, they arnt going to just latch onto my rocks, especially with the Phosfree removing phosphates. And they will be rinsed with RO/DI before they go into my tank anyways.


__________________
Keep our planet clean

"PH s/b 7.9-8.3, salinity 1.024-6; alkalinity 8.3-9.3; calcium 420; magnesium 1300, temp abt 80. Alk and cal will not rise if mg is low."
Danzig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/17/2011, 08:53 PM   #104
reefrad
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 134
the only attitude in my post was directed at the 'damn phosphates'...

i still think it makes more sense to use 'clean' water. the whole idea is to 'clean' the rocks no?


reefrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/17/2011, 09:33 PM   #105
Danzig
Registered Member
 
Danzig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by maysorum View Post
Hmm, do you know the TDS of your well water? Mine is very high, 683.
i dont, and i wont know it until i get my RO/DI setup i just received it yesterday.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefrad View Post
the only attitude in my post was directed at the 'damn phosphates'...

i still think it makes more sense to use 'clean' water. the whole idea is to 'clean' the rocks no?
No. Im not cleaning the rocks, im absorbing the phosphates from them.. and if there is a little bit of phosphate in my water it will do the same thing. Even so, at the end of doing this there will be little to no phosphates left. I appreciate your concern though.


__________________
Keep our planet clean

"PH s/b 7.9-8.3, salinity 1.024-6; alkalinity 8.3-9.3; calcium 420; magnesium 1300, temp abt 80. Alk and cal will not rise if mg is low."
Danzig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/17/2011, 10:10 PM   #106
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
If the well water is high enough in phosphate, which can be tested, it might require a lot of Phosfree to remove it, but it should work. The well water might be contaminated with other things, though, so it could be an issue. Copper comes to mind as one possibility.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/18/2011, 01:20 AM   #107
Danzig
Registered Member
 
Danzig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertoni View Post
If the well water is high enough in phosphate, which can be tested, it might require a lot of Phosfree to remove it, but it should work. The well water might be contaminated with other things, though, so it could be an issue. Copper comes to mind as one possibility.
ok thanks!


__________________
Keep our planet clean

"PH s/b 7.9-8.3, salinity 1.024-6; alkalinity 8.3-9.3; calcium 420; magnesium 1300, temp abt 80. Alk and cal will not rise if mg is low."
Danzig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2011, 05:50 PM   #108
banzai75x
Registered Member
 
banzai75x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 92618
Posts: 944
Glad I found this post. I'm battling the hair algae. Been using RODI since day one. I bleached/acid washed the rock but the algae came and its not stopping. I'm doing water chagnes every 2 weeks.

Will it ever stop?

I might go the route of the LC drip but I need to do more research.

I'm running GFO too.. Doesn't seem to be helping.


__________________
Josh
banzai75x is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2011, 06:06 PM   #109
banzai75x
Registered Member
 
banzai75x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 92618
Posts: 944
Is a 100 micron sock too big?


__________________
Josh
banzai75x is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2011, 07:39 PM   #110
OregonReefer
Registered Member
 
OregonReefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 629
Dave and Monica had great success with a 10 micron sock... The precipitate is pretty fine stuff


__________________
120g drilled, 30G sump, 20g Fuge, RO NWB200 Skimmer, Glass Holes Overflow, mag 12.0 return, Reeflo Dart closed loop, 6-bulb Sunlight Tek
OregonReefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2011, 07:53 PM   #111
zigzag1
Registered Member
 
zigzag1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmz View Post
Zigzag Not all of it will. It depends on the water it was in and how it was processed. I'd just let it sit for a few days in curing water and monitor the water's PO4 level. If it doesn't go up then it's not leaching PO4.Other than being dead , it's not much different than live rock in terms of organic content as well as phospahte. There is still dry material will decay in water.It's a good product that benefits from some early attention.
Hi Tom. Not sure I fully understand your reply but just wanted to share my experience with the 'reefsaver' type rock, which I have recently re-purchased and re-tested. The rock I am using is acquired from Premium Aquatics. It is mined limestone rock, very similar to all of the BRS Reefsaver rock and Marco rock I have ever seen. All of these mined type rocks look exactly the same to me more or less, with a consistent beige color and lifeless appearance, and not a recently live rock which has been dried look with a more varied texture.

I am not exactly sure where it is acquired by PA, but Jeremy is a member of my reef club, INDMAS, and might share his source with me. If he says it's okay by him, I'll share it here too. The Premium Aquatics dry rock is what I'm calling mined rock.

When the mined type rocks are soaked in my old tank water for more than 72 hours and then tested for phosphates, I have always had very low results. This time using the PA dried, mined rock and tested with the Hanna Phosphate checker at 36 hours and 72 hours, both tests show very low levels of phosphates - 0.00 by the Hanna checker. This is very similar to my previous tests of this type of rock. I do realize there is some error margin in the tester, but feel even so, the values are still significantly low compared to other types of dried recently live rock. To me this is a HUGE advantage over dry Pukani or any other recently live then dried rock. I choose to use mined dry rock over dried live for the advantage of low nutrients- and this is the point I am trying to share with others.

If your results are different, can you tell me where you acquired your dry rock? My point is about the mined, not recently from a reef or in the ocean, type rock. Can you also share the water yours was in, and how it was processed? The rock I have soaked and tested seems very different than dead rock as far as nutrient content. This is consistent with my results doing this with this type of dried rock over the last few years. I realize that my mined rock was likely previously live rock, possibly many hundred or thousands of years ago, but feel it is very different than recently live rock in phosphate and organic content. I think the point I am trying to make has value, may be valuable to others considering the dry rock route and which type may more quick and easy to use. JMTC!


__________________
:beer:

Mixed Reef, started 10/2004: 6' BB 125g DT, 100lbs LR, 40g sump, Dual Ehiem 1000 returns, Eshopps dual overflow, JBJ ATO, Vertex IN-180, PM Ca reactor, 250w MH w/VHO Actinic, AC3 w/Aquasurf, Tunze 6105 pair & 40B frag tank

8 Fish, 20+ corals, shrimp, snails, worms, bugs, etc.
zigzag1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 10:24 AM   #112
banzai75x
Registered Member
 
banzai75x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 92618
Posts: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by OregonReefer View Post
Dave and Monica had great success with a 10 micron sock... The precipitate is pretty fine stuff
Can't seem to locate one on the fish stores.. They are all 100 micron.. Anyone know where to get one?


__________________
Josh
banzai75x is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 10:28 AM   #113
BowieReefer84
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Maryland, 21075
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by banzai75x View Post
Can't seem to locate one on the fish stores.. They are all 100 micron.. Anyone know where to get one?
http://www.filterprofilters.com/

I have ordered from them with positive results.


BowieReefer84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 11:21 AM   #114
banzai75x
Registered Member
 
banzai75x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 92618
Posts: 944
So I was thinking some more, and instead of using a sock. I was thinking of pulling half of my rock out and then added the LC or this..

http://www.marinedepot.com/Aqua_Visi...ADSAPR-vi.html

That way at least I can clean off the algae that is on the rock as well and treat it at the same time.

This shouldn't affect any of the critters right?

Would this be a better route to go or would you suggest just dripping through a filter sock.


__________________
Josh
banzai75x is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 01:34 PM   #115
sahin
Ultimate Reefer
 
sahin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by zigzag1 View Post
Hi Tom. Not sure I fully understand your reply but just wanted to share my experience with the 'reefsaver' type rock, which I have recently re-purchased and re-tested. The rock I am using is acquired from Premium Aquatics. It is mined limestone rock, very similar to all of the BRS Reefsaver rock and Marco rock I have ever seen. All of these mined type rocks look exactly the same to me more or less, with a consistent beige color and lifeless appearance, and not a recently live rock which has been dried look with a more varied texture.

I am not exactly sure where it is acquired by PA, but Jeremy is a member of my reef club, INDMAS, and might share his source with me. If he says it's okay by him, I'll share it here too. The Premium Aquatics dry rock is what I'm calling mined rock.

When the mined type rocks are soaked in my old tank water for more than 72 hours and then tested for phosphates, I have always had very low results. This time using the PA dried, mined rock and tested with the Hanna Phosphate checker at 36 hours and 72 hours, both tests show very low levels of phosphates - 0.00 by the Hanna checker. This is very similar to my previous tests of this type of rock. I do realize there is some error margin in the tester, but feel even so, the values are still significantly low compared to other types of dried recently live rock. To me this is a HUGE advantage over dry Pukani or any other recently live then dried rock. I choose to use mined dry rock over dried live for the advantage of low nutrients- and this is the point I am trying to share with others.

If your results are different, can you tell me where you acquired your dry rock? My point is about the mined, not recently from a reef or in the ocean, type rock. Can you also share the water yours was in, and how it was processed? The rock I have soaked and tested seems very different than dead rock as far as nutrient content. This is consistent with my results doing this with this type of dried rock over the last few years. I realize that my mined rock was likely previously live rock, possibly many hundred or thousands of years ago, but feel it is very different than recently live rock in phosphate and organic content. I think the point I am trying to make has value, may be valuable to others considering the dry rock route and which type may more quick and easy to use. JMTC!
zigzag1: Many thanks for your post. I live in the UK and had my wife bring over Key Largo Rocks purchased from Marcorocks . com whilst she was in the USA. I bought it because looking at build threads over many forums, this dry rock seemed to have the least amount of organics and leached the least amount of Phosphates.

Can you please clarify one thing though: What is the exact type of rock you purchased?

The reason I am asking is because so many people state "dry rock", "marco rocks" etc etc and as an example; Marcorocks isnt a product; it is the business name, Key largo, Dry Fiji, etc etc are the products.

I had to ask so many people and do some detective work to figure out what type of rock they had actually bought that they are saying is very good.

Not having a go at you; quite the opposite; I thank you for your post. I just want you to clarify the type of rock because it will help others in making an informed choice.

I went to the PA website and it looks like Jeremy sells only TWO types of dry rock. One of them is the Key Largo Rocks from Marcorocks and the
other is something called South Seas dry base rock.

Here are the links:
http://premiumaquatics.com/aquatic-s...s/C-00370.html - South seas rock

http://premiumaquatics.com/aquatic-s...MARCO-DRY.html - Marco Key Largo Rocks

If you can be certain as to which type the rock is and report back to this thread I would truly appreciate that.

FWIW, I am slightly unsure about how clean the Key Largo dry rock from Marcorocks is, and proceeded to clean it via the following:

1. Several washes through RO water.
2. Soak in bleach.
3. Several washes in RO water.
4. Acid wash in Muriatic Acid.
5. Several washes in RO water.

The rocks are now in my tank which I just reset with the Key Largo rocks. I added saltwater a few days ago and added Special Blend to seed the rocks with bacteria. I have a Hanna ULR Phosphorus meter which I am quite used to using and will take a few readings to confirm just how clean this rock is. When I used Liverock previously, even after a few months I was getting more than 0.5ppm phosphate unless I utilised lots of phosphate remover in my reactor.

If I get a reading at or below 0.03ppm without the use of any phosphate remover then I will be very happy. I will post my finding in a few days.

If you do infact have the Key Largo type, then I am very happy because it means I have the same stuff and so I wont be fighting a phosphate battle.

Many thanks.


sahin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 01:48 PM   #116
swanny
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: denver
Posts: 406
Wish I would have come across this thread earlier. Just tore down and rebuilt my 120g and added 75lbs. of dry Marco rock (key largo and shelf rock). Looks like I may be curing for a while. I'll add chaeto and run gfo and see how it goes. I won't run lights to reduce ha.


swanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 01:54 PM   #117
sahin
Ultimate Reefer
 
sahin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by swanny View Post
Wish I would have come across this thread earlier. Just tore down and rebuilt my 120g and added 75lbs. of dry Marco rock (key largo and shelf rock). Looks like I may be curing for a while. I'll add chaeto and run gfo and see how it goes. I won't run lights to reduce ha.
Why? It looks like the current 2010 plus batches of Key Largo Rocks from MarcoRocks is the best in terms of least amount of organics and phosphate.

I should have said above that I was unsure about the Key Largo rocks, hence why I did the acid wash etc, but since reading more and more build thread I believe it is the cleanest. I will confirm in a few days time in respect of the phosphate leaching, if any.


sahin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 02:14 PM   #118
swanny
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: denver
Posts: 406
Yeah, I'll confirm as well. The good thing about my set up is I'm just starting over, not adding to an established tank. I can go without lights, use the skimmer, gfo and chaeto. This should take care of excess phosphates as well as my ammonia cycle, hopefully. My Marcorock is amazing by the way. Used putty to make the coolest islands with shelf rock sticking out.


swanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 02:56 PM   #119
sahin
Ultimate Reefer
 
sahin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by swanny View Post
Yeah, I'll confirm as well. The good thing about my set up is I'm just starting over, not adding to an established tank. I can go without lights, use the skimmer, gfo and chaeto. This should take care of excess phosphates as well as my ammonia cycle, hopefully. My Marcorock is amazing by the way. Used putty to make the coolest islands with shelf rock sticking out.
I am starting out completely fresh too. I will run the tank without lights for about 6 weeks. If the rocks do in fact have very little phosphates on them, then I believe within that time, I can bring the overall phosphate and nutrient level very low for SPS requirements and then start lights at a few hours per day whilst keeping a eye on the parameters.


sahin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 03:41 PM   #120
swanny
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: denver
Posts: 406
Yep, you and I are in the same boat here. You can also add a water change in that time frame.


swanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/21/2011, 04:11 PM   #121
purge43
Registered Member
 
purge43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: philadelphia, pa
Posts: 435
I didnt read all the posts on this thread, but this you may find interesting..................Your question regarding product BRS Pukani Dry Eco Aquarium Live Rock has been answered

Your question:
I just read a post in Rc and the poster claims his source of high Po4 is from his BRS Pukani rock. I asked for confirmation and for his methods of coming to that conclusion. I also am a victim of high Po4, my source could be from some cheap rock I bought from a lfs going out of business or my city water supply. I was planning on buying a bunch of the Pukani rock and starting all over. But now Im concerned. Is it posible Pukani rock has alot of Po4, if so could I get it out? or Do you have a rock that you can assure me is Po4 free?


Their answer is:
Hey William,
Phosphates are pretty much always caused by excessive feeding, poor filtration, and not enough water changes. While some people out there claim a particular rock could somehow house and leach phosphates I haven't ever seen any science to back that up and it tends to go against standard solubility rules (ie, if its present it wouldn't dissolve into the water). The pukani rock is the same as live rock (it was live, its literally the same stuff) but has been allowed to dry. It is possible if the rock wasn't properly cured or washed that if there is still decaying organic matter on the rock (say a dead starfish inside it or something) that that could be breaking down and contributing to the levels of phosphate in the tank. Properly curing the rock before putting it into the tank should take care of that though.


__________________
180g 6' sps reef/tangs, berlin method, 6x hydra52's, geo618 cal rx, IO salt, water QC salifert and hanna, milwaulkee and green air products controls

Current Tank Info: standard 180g
purge43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/22/2011, 07:44 AM   #122
sahin
Ultimate Reefer
 
sahin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,540
I am so pleased to report that my Key Largo Rocks are very clean! Very LOW PHOSPHATE!

I tested using my Hanna ULR Phosphorus meter. I have been using this meter for the past 6 months or so and I can say that I am fairly well versed with using the meter and consequently obtain consistent results.

I made several tests in any event. I got a consistent result of 0.027ppm of phosphate in my tank (after conversion etc)! Woohooo! A big thumbs up to MarcoRocks!

Last night I posted above and stated that if I get a reading of 0.03ppm then I'd be pretty happy!

When I setup my 47G tank with Liverock it took me MANY MONTHS of using 0.5litres of Phosphate remover to bring levels below 0.03ppm! I even had to continue using that much phosphate remover to keep the levels lower than 0.03ppm, so this is very good news for me.

I have Prodibio Bacteria on order now and will start to dose that when I get it. Previous tanks that were seeded with Prodibio did very well. Due to the low levels of phosphate in the Key Largo Rock perhaps the Prodibio bacteria might be enough to reduce phosphate levels very low without the use of phosphate remover.

I'm very pleased with my Key Largo Rocks from MarcoRocks.com!


sahin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/22/2011, 09:23 AM   #123
swanny
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: denver
Posts: 406
Good to hear Sahin! Just fired up my tank last night. I need to add a little more salt today and I'll be good to go. Keep us updated on your progress.


swanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/22/2011, 03:48 PM   #124
sahin
Ultimate Reefer
 
sahin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by swanny View Post
Good to hear Sahin! Just fired up my tank last night. I need to add a little more salt today and I'll be good to go. Keep us updated on your progress.
In a few days let us know what the average phosphate you get in your tank. I should have made it clear above that I dont have any sand in my tank as I am going bare bottom.

You MAY get a higher reading for phosphate though it may be due to the sand if you are using sand.

Thanks.


sahin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/23/2011, 08:56 AM   #125
SPotter
Registered Member
 
SPotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Posts: 5,691
getting ready to cook, cure, de-phosphate...etc..

I am trying to decide between using SeaKlear or PhosFree. Seaklear is $34 + shipping for 1 qt and I can get 3 liters or a little over 3 qts of Phosfree on amazon for $28 with free shipping. Is one better than the other?


__________________
Steve

Am I really doing all of this for a fish tank??????

Current Tank Info: 360g Envision Acrylic Tank, Closed Loops, Vectra L1's, MP40QD's, 400w Radiums, Regal 300ext, Dastaco Ext3 CaRx, Controlled by GHL Profilux
SPotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone know where i can get some pukani rocks?? Mixedreefer New to the Hobby 2 01/10/2009 02:13 PM
Pukani Rock Kenmx10 Reef Discussion 20 01/05/2009 01:32 PM
Pukani rock grandp10 Premium Aquatics 1 12/27/2006 10:16 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.