Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 05/16/2018, 09:23 PM   #1
tjm9331
Registered Member
 
tjm9331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 340
125 build question

Hi guys,

Been a while since I posted on here...

I am slowing planning a 125 gallon upgrade from my 75. The tank is 72” long 18 wide and I believe 24 deep. It will also have a 40 breeder sump so total volume will be around 155 gallons (I’m guessing only about 30 gallons of water will be in the sump.

Anyways on to my question I’m looking at the Aquamaxx ConeS Q3 skimmer for this build, I’ve had aquamaxx skimmers before and have had great success with them. What I’m wondering, is the Q3 too big for a 125? Rating say 240gal heavily stocked but I’ve read that you should get a skimmer 1.5-2x the volume of your tank.

I don’t want to make the mistake of buying a skimmer that’s too big for my tank and not pulling out all the nasty stuff.

Thanks in advance


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


tjm9331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/16/2018, 10:23 PM   #2
thegrun
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Garden Grove, Ca
Posts: 17,023
Probably, I run a CO-2 on my 120 with a 70 gallon sump and it's more than big enough.


thegrun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/17/2018, 04:41 AM   #3
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjm9331 View Post
but I’ve read that you should get a skimmer 1.5-2x the volume of your tank.
I think the skimmer manufacturers started that BS to get you to spend more money...
I'd recommend underskimmer vs over...


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/17/2018, 05:14 AM   #4
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Slightly oversized maybe, but double... Yea they are trying to upsell IMO.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/17/2018, 05:26 AM   #5
tjm9331
Registered Member
 
tjm9331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgyvr View Post
I think the skimmer manufacturers started that BS to get you to spend more money...

I'd recommend underskimmer vs over...


So the Q2 would be better? Recommended for 130 gallons heavy bio-load?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


tjm9331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/17/2018, 05:36 AM   #6
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjm9331 View Post
So the Q2 would be better? Recommended for 130 gallons heavy bio-load?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd say so. Take into account your added filtration water volume and then subtract substrate and equipment displacement and you're somewhere in the neighborhood of 110-130. So that skimmer is perfectly sized.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/17/2018, 07:07 AM   #7
tjm9331
Registered Member
 
tjm9331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 340
I guess the only other question or thought I have is the possibility of an even larger upgrade in 3-4years

Would I be ok using the Q3 on this system and have it for the upgrade later on or would I be better off just getting the right one for this system and upgrade my skimmer at the same time I upgrade size of DT?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


tjm9331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/18/2018, 07:49 AM   #8
tjm9331
Registered Member
 
tjm9331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 340
Hey guys I know you’ve already given your opinion on this and I appreciate it but I’m still struggling to make a decision between the Q3 and the Q2. I talked to a guy at my lfs and he’s telling that if I plan on feeding heavily, which I do since I’ll have at least 3 tangs (the smaller sized ones like tomini, yellow and bristletooth) a Niger trigger and a couple eels (snowflake and chain link)

He’s suggesting to get the bigger of the two skimmers. If you guys think that’s inaccurate please tell me. This is my first time buying an in sump skimmer and one this large so I’m a bit in unfamiliar territory.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


tjm9331 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/21/2018, 05:48 AM   #9
RobZilla04
Registered Member
 
RobZilla04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,857
if you have any plan to upgrade to a larger tank in the future, get the larger skimmer. That being said, you're planned upgrade needs to be within the volume range of the specific skimmer, otherwise you'll need to get a different skimmer in either case.


__________________
90g Mixed Reef
RobZilla04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.