Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > Coral Forums > SPS Keepers
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 11/18/2007, 09:49 AM   #176
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by MCsaxmaster
Please do as I'm curious. Suffice it to say, things cannot be quite as you described above
lol--I think they were threads from you on magnesium-LOL

won't be the first time I interpreted wrong


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11/18/2007, 10:18 AM   #177
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by MCsaxmaster
Please do as I'm curious. Suffice it to say, things cannot be quite as you described above
I checked back on this thread--on page six you wrote a great piece on magnesium---but this was not the thread.

I only have a modest background in chemistry, but usually I am not too far off on comprehending what I have read.

With your obvious fantastic expertise perhaps you can clarify "things not cannot be "quite as your described above"

I'll concede to "quite" as a very tactful way of remarking about this
and ask your help here in clarifying.


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/27/2007, 08:17 PM   #178
cwegescheide
YOU have been ignored!
 
cwegescheide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,231
One thing I notice is my PH is higher when my Alk is low.


cwegescheide is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/27/2007, 10:16 PM   #179
gary faulkner
Registered Member
 
gary faulkner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,468
Quote:
Originally posted by cwegescheide
One thing I notice is my PH is higher when my Alk is low.
I think that is a given, right?


gary faulkner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/27/2007, 11:44 PM   #180
MCsaxmaster
Registered Member
 
MCsaxmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 3,498
Quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by cwegescheide
One thing I notice is my PH is higher when my Alk is low.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I think that is a given, right?
No, with lower alkalinity the pH will be lower, all other things being equal. If pH here really is lower when the alkalinity is higher, then CO2 must covary with alkalinity in this case. Hence, the CO2 becomes significantly higher as alkalinity climbs higher, causing the reduced pH.

cj


__________________
"When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong."

-Dawkins

Current Tank Info: ...but, but, the ocean is right there...
MCsaxmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/28/2007, 10:26 AM   #181
cwegescheide
YOU have been ignored!
 
cwegescheide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,231
Quote:
Originally posted by MCsaxmaster
No, with lower alkalinity the pH will be lower, all other things being equal. If pH here really is lower when the alkalinity is higher, then CO2 must covary with alkalinity in this case. Hence, the CO2 becomes significantly higher as alkalinity climbs higher, causing the reduced pH.

cj
Since my supplementation is provided by a calcium reactor I guess I buy that. My thinking was/is the amount of alkalinity supplied by my reactor is buffering my ph, not allowing it to rise above a certain point. EVERY time my ph goes above a certain point (just recalibrated my probe - it was reading 8.6 but I know its not that high) I know my Alk is low. Now I'm not sure if its because the amount of bicarbonate in suspension is low or its the lack of Co2 in the tank.. Since CJ is working on his MS in Marine Biology I will take his word for it


cwegescheide is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/28/2007, 04:30 PM   #182
gary faulkner
Registered Member
 
gary faulkner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,468
Quote:
Originally posted by MCsaxmaster
No, with lower alkalinity the pH will be lower, all other things being equal. If pH here really is lower when the alkalinity is higher, then CO2 must covary with alkalinity in this case. Hence, the CO2 becomes significantly higher as alkalinity climbs higher, causing the reduced pH.

cj
Sorry, I read that wrong. If my Ph falls I always check to see if the alk is lower. It has a direct relationship not inverse?

Thanks


gary faulkner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/28/2007, 08:34 PM   #183
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by gary faulkner
Sorry, I read that wrong. If my Ph falls I always check to see if the alk is lower. It has a direct relationship not inverse?

Thanks
that would be a direct relationship


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/29/2007, 12:52 AM   #184
MCsaxmaster
Registered Member
 
MCsaxmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 3,498
Quote:
Originally posted by gary faulkner
Sorry, I read that wrong. If my Ph falls I always check to see if the alk is lower. It has a direct relationship not inverse?

Thanks
pH is positively correlated with total alkalinity and negatively correlated with total CO2. Raise total alkalinity, everything else equal, and you'll raise pH. Raise total CO2, everything else equal, and you'll lower pH. Raise both total alkalinity and total CO2 proportionally and you'll maintain the same pH.

These relationships ARE NOT linear, but understanding the general form of the relationships is very useful.


__________________
"When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong."

-Dawkins

Current Tank Info: ...but, but, the ocean is right there...
MCsaxmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/13/2008, 10:23 PM   #185
morphlingman
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 130
Great post people. Lots of advice.
One year ago a purchased a two chamber reactor (B-Ionic could not keep up with Calcium demands), filled with Arm media, it worked great for the first 6-8 months, but the past 4 months or so it has difficult. I find myself doing tests and adjustments every two or three days. Over the past 4 months results have been as follows. Alk jumps around 9-16, Calcium also up and down 340-410 and just tested Mg for the first time yesterday 1100 (starting to supplement).
Has anyone had problems with effluent flow going down daily. As an example I could set it at 30 ml/min and the next day sometimes sooner it has gone down to 28, even 26, ml/min. (Yes I have replaced the in & out tubes and cleaned (rinsed) adjustment valves.


morphlingman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02/14/2008, 04:28 PM   #186
melev
Moved On
 
melev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 43,217
I would check to see if the feed pump to the reactor (from the sump) is unobstructed, as well as the physical connection where it goes into the Calcium Reactor. Mine clogs up with detritus and it is a pain to clean out.

To help keep your calcium reactor's output more consistent and avoid Alkalinity swings like you've posted, I would (and do) use a pH Controller. That way it will turn the CO2 on and off as necessary and your tank remains safer.


melev is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03/05/2008, 07:28 PM   #187
MIKE NY
Two Decade club
 
MIKE NY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Franklin Square, N.Y.
Posts: 4,381
x-2....I keep a PH probe in the effluent cup so I'll know right away if something is wrong......


__________________
Proud LIRA Member
February 2011 Manhattan Reefs TOTM

Current Tank Info: 170 gal Reef, 20 gal frag/reef,90 gal fuge, 65 gal sump, 2-250 Radiums on Hamilton M80 HQIs, T5 actincs, Vertex in280 skimmer, MRC-2 Cal Reactor, Reeflo return pump
MIKE NY is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/24/2008, 08:21 PM   #188
Reefun
Registered Member
 
Reefun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 534
I’ve read this thread from the first page and didn’t see anything like my problem. Hope it’s ok to ask this here. I’ve never had a tank with a lot of sps and I plan on adding a lot more. So I’m doing my best to better understand the demands of a sps only tank. I’ve been in the hobby for a long time but this is a little different than my previous setups.
My ph is 8
Mg is 1380
Cal is 440
DKH is now 9-10 but just got it there
In about 100gal
My ph, Mg and calcium were and are stable but my alk would not stay up. I was adding about a teaspoon a day of Kent super buffer -dkh just to keep dkh from slipping below 8. After about two weeks of this I got a test kit for MG and it was and is at 1380. I don’t know how it got there because my freshly mixed salt is at 1100. I switched about a week ago to Kent coral builder and after using about 4oz my DKH is now around 9-10. I’ve ordered a bulk two part kit that should be in next week so I will not continue to use the Kent products at that point.
So basically my two questions are:
1. How could my dkh keep going down while calcium remained relatively unchanged?
2. How did my magnesium level get to where it is now? Nothing was ever added to the tank other than the Kent products mentioned and Kent turbo calcium in very small amounts.
Tank is just over two months old and only in the last month had anything in it that would use calcium


Reefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/24/2008, 09:10 PM   #189
MCsaxmaster
Registered Member
 
MCsaxmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 3,498
Quote:
Originally posted by Reefun
So basically my two questions are:
1. How could my dkh keep going down while calcium remained relatively unchanged?
The most likely answer, if the result were “real” (see what I mean below) would be the addition of an acid. An acid will reduce alkalinity without necessarily affecting calcium.

In order to measure a change in concentration of something in sea water (e.g., calcium concentration, magnesium concentration, total alkalinity) we have observe a change in concentration larger than the error of our analytical method.

For example, the accuracy with which we can measure calcium concentration in sea water is about +/- 5%, which really isn’t too bad for a hobbyist grade test kit. Since the calcium concentration in NSW is ~412 ppm we can measure the concentration accurately to within about +/- 20 ppm. In other words, if the calcium concentration changes by less than ~20 ppm, we cannot accurately or confidently measure a change in concentration. This also means that if we measure a concentration of 400 ppm, the real concentration should be within roughly the range of 380-420 ppm, but we cannot determine where it is in that range without using a more accurate analytical method.

For total alkalinity we see the same sorts of concerns. We can measure alk. to within a margin of error, but we can’t determine where in that margin of error the real value is—we can just shrink the error by using better methodology. For alk. measurements we can typically see an error of about +/- 1 dKH (or about +/- 0.35 meq/l). So, if we measure 9 dKH, the real value is likely somewhere in the range of 8-10 dKH. If the alk. changes more than 1 dKH we can measure a change in total alkalinity, but we cannot accurately measure a change if the change is not at least that large.

When calcium is removed from the water to build skeletons, two equivalents of alkalinity are also removed:

Ca2+ + 2HCO3- = CaCO3 + CO2

This reaction proceeds as a molar ratio, not as a mass ratio. We normally measure calcium based on mass (ppm calcium is equivalent to grams of calcium per kilogram of SW). If you do the calculation you find that for every 1 meq/l = 2.8 dKH of total alkalinity you remove from the water you also remove 20 ppm calcium.

Recall, we have to remove a MINIMUM of 20 ppm calcium just to be able to accurately measure any change at all. In order to achieve this change in calcium we have removed roughly 3x the amount of alkalinity we need to in order to see a change in concentration.

Imagine, for example, that you measure a drop in alk. of 1 dKH in your aquarium after a couple of days. That is a big enough change to say with confidence that the alk. has fallen by about 1 dKH. How much should the calcium have changed? The calculation is fairly simple: 20/2.8 ~ 7 ppm. That change in calcium is too small to measure, meaning that we would get about the same measured value for calcium. This could give us the impression that alkalinity is falling while calcium is remaining stable, however, this is an artifact that results simply due to the nature of measuring these parameters in SW. There is almost 5 times as much calcium in NSW as there is alkalinity. We can easily measure a 10% change in calcium concentration or total alkalinity in your sea water, but a 10% reduction of alkalinity causes less than a 2% change in calcium due to the difference in background concentration.

The most likely scenario is that both are decreasing, but due to the nature analytical chemistry and statistics, you can only measure that change that is occurring in both by measuring alkalinity.

Quote:
Originally posted by Reefun
2. How did my magnesium level get to where it is now? Nothing was ever added to the tank other than the Kent products mentioned and Kent turbo calcium in very small amounts.
Tank is just over two months old and only in the last month had anything in it that would use calcium
No idea…more info please.

Chris


__________________
"When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong."

-Dawkins

Current Tank Info: ...but, but, the ocean is right there...
MCsaxmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/25/2008, 08:57 AM   #190
Reefun
Registered Member
 
Reefun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 534
Ok that answers my DKH question. I did add a small amount of calcium so It is very possible it moved less than my test could detect .
But the magnesium is still confusing me. I like the level it’s at but I want to know how it got there so I don’t raise it even higher. I ran the test for mg three times with a Red Sea test. The only thing I’ve read that suggest were the mg could have come from is the label of the Kent coral builder. It reads “Coral builder is designed to have only minimal impact on calcium, MAGNESIUM or strontium levels unlike other buffers.” So could it have come from the Kent super buffer-dkh?
There is really not much else to say about the tank I’ve not added any thing other than the mentioned products. If there is anything more you need to know please let me know.


Reefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/25/2008, 09:27 AM   #191
MCsaxmaster
Registered Member
 
MCsaxmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 3,498
Hmmm, do you now or have you in the past used tapwater in the tank (as opposed to RO/DI)?


__________________
"When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong."

-Dawkins

Current Tank Info: ...but, but, the ocean is right there...
MCsaxmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/25/2008, 03:25 PM   #192
Reefun
Registered Member
 
Reefun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 534
Never used tap water all water came from my RO/DI and it has only made about 500gal. All filters are good.


Reefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/25/2008, 03:27 PM   #193
Reefun
Registered Member
 
Reefun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 534
Could it have come from a bag of salt that was off?


Reefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/25/2008, 07:55 PM   #194
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
I am still trying to check out the coral builder as to what exactly is in it. I hate it when a company won't list the ingredients of a product.
The statement "minimal impact" on magnesium--that brings up a red flag for me
I'll ask on the reef chemistry forum


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/25/2008, 08:00 PM   #195
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
here is the link to the thread in the chem forum

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/sh...readid=1378557


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04/25/2008, 10:40 PM   #196
Reefun
Registered Member
 
Reefun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 534
Thanks


Reefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2008, 02:22 PM   #197
matan_grin
the jewish superman
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 239
nice post..
learnd a lot from it


matan_grin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/14/2008, 05:14 PM   #198
khoivo1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: snowta usa
Posts: 748
i have the same problem ,,,now i am setting up calcium reactor,,,
how do i increase alk alone,,without raise cal ?? with geo cal reactor,,,
my alk going down very fast,,,but cal is going down slow,,,any one own calcium reactor please help me thanks


Quote:
Originally posted by Reefun
I’ve read this thread from the first page and didn’t see anything like my problem. Hope it’s ok to ask this here. I’ve never had a tank with a lot of sps and I plan on adding a lot more. So I’m doing my best to better understand the demands of a sps only tank. I’ve been in the hobby for a long time but this is a little different than my previous setups.
My ph is 8
Mg is 1380
Cal is 440
DKH is now 9-10 but just got it there
In about 100gal
My ph, Mg and calcium were and are stable but my alk would not stay up. I was adding about a teaspoon a day of Kent super buffer -dkh just to keep dkh from slipping below 8. After about two weeks of this I got a test kit for MG and it was and is at 1380. I don’t know how it got there because my freshly mixed salt is at 1100. I switched about a week ago to Kent coral builder and after using about 4oz my DKH is now around 9-10. I’ve ordered a bulk two part kit that should be in next week so I will not continue to use the Kent products at that point.
So basically my two questions are:
1. How could my dkh keep going down while calcium remained relatively unchanged?
2. How did my magnesium level get to where it is now? Nothing was ever added to the tank other than the Kent products mentioned and Kent turbo calcium in very small amounts.
Tank is just over two months old and only in the last month had anything in it that would use calcium



khoivo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/14/2008, 06:38 PM   #199
MCsaxmaster
Registered Member
 
MCsaxmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 3,498
Quote:
Originally posted by khoivo1
i have the same problem ,,,now i am setting up calcium reactor,,,
how do i increase alk alone,,without raise cal ?? with geo cal reactor,,,
my alk going down very fast,,,but cal is going down slow,,,any one own calcium reactor please help me thanks
Calcium will always appear to get used slower than alkalinity. This is an apparent result stemming from the fact that there is ~5x as much calcium in sea water as alkalinity and to produce calcium carbonate it takes 1 equivalent of calcium but 2 equivalents of carbonate alkalinity.

A calcium reactor will return calcium and alkalinity in very close to the same ratio that they are used (1:2) since you are simply dissolving CaCO3 (though in reality there is some MgCO3, a small amount of SrCO3 and several impurities layed down by calcifiers in the tank and present in the reactor media). Since there is a large background concentration of calcium in the water, it takes a heck of a lot of calcification to notice a change in concentration. On the other hand, since there is a far smaller background concentration of carbonate alkalinity it doesn't take as much calcification to be able to notice the alkalinity dropping. The important thing to understand is that we have the *appearance* of different rates of change not because calcium and alkalinity are being sucked out at an imbalanced rate, but simply because of an artifact of measurment.

Thus, probably all you need to do is adjust your reactor a bit higher. That will raise both calcium and alkalinity properly. However, since there's already a lot of calcium, it will be a proportionally small change. Since there is much less alkalinity, it will be a proportionally large change.

In terms of the actual stoichiometry: if you dissolve 1 milliequivalent of CaCO3 in a liter of water you'll raise the alkalinity 1 meq/l and you'll raise the calcium ~20 ppm.

Chris


__________________
"When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong."

-Dawkins

Current Tank Info: ...but, but, the ocean is right there...
MCsaxmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/14/2008, 07:38 PM   #200
Aquarist007
Registered Member
 
Aquarist007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 28,240
Blog Entries: 1
IMO it is not said enough-- MCsaxmaster--thank you for all the detailed posts you make, I and I am sure others have learned alot from you.


__________________
I prefer my substrates stirred but not shaken

Current Tank Info: 150gal long mixed reef, 90gal sump, 60 gal refugium with 200 lbs live rock
Aquarist007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright 1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.