Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 08/16/2010, 02:37 PM   #76
btkrausen
Fish Hoarder
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,033
Interested in doing this as well. I currently use the BRS Dual reactor. Should I replace both carbon and GFO containers with the EcoBak?

I have a lot of SPS...and not really a high fish load right now. Display is 65g, sump holds about 25-30gal, and I have a 35 gal tank plumbed in but only has a few snails and crabs in it right now. I do drip Kalk about every night.


btkrausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/16/2010, 08:07 PM   #77
sedor
Registered Member
 
sedor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,689
I would use both reactors will the pellets, don't try and run carbon or GFO and the biopellets together.


__________________
Ryan
sedor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/17/2010, 06:14 AM   #78
btkrausen
Fish Hoarder
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,033
After reading a couple long threads, and knowing that my P04 isn't high at all, I'm not sure that pellets would benefit me. I drip Kalk every night, which looks to keep my P in check. I have absolutely no algae growth anywhere.

I run at BRS Dual w/ Rox carbon and GFO. Would it be benefitical, or just stick to the normal routine. Would like to replace the GFO w/ pellets if its a "set and forget" kind of deal, or if it brings other benefits, such as water clarity and such.

THoughts?


btkrausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/17/2010, 10:34 AM   #79
solitude127
Proud user of IO Salt!
 
solitude127's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 9,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by btkrausen View Post
After reading a couple long threads, and knowing that my P04 isn't high at all, I'm not sure that pellets would benefit me. I drip Kalk every night, which looks to keep my P in check. I have absolutely no algae growth anywhere.

I run at BRS Dual w/ Rox carbon and GFO. Would it be benefitical, or just stick to the normal routine. Would like to replace the GFO w/ pellets if its a "set and forget" kind of deal, or if it brings other benefits, such as water clarity and such.

THoughts?
If it aint broke why fix it.
IMO, if you're ok with your routine, then why change. Obviously it's working.


__________________
Mike
<*)))>{ <*)))>{ <*)))>{ <*)))>{

ReefKeeping.com TOTM Nov 2012
Socalireefs Featured Reef Oct 2011

Current Tank Info: 60*30*20, 8x54 ATI Powermodule, ReefBrite XHO, ATB Elegance 200, Aquamaxx CTech CaRx, Ecotech Vortechs, Apex Controls, WM Ecobak powered. RedSea Reefer 170, MP10, Apex Jr, Ecotech Radion XR15, Aquamaxx WS-1
solitude127 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/17/2010, 10:41 AM   #80
btkrausen
Fish Hoarder
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,033
Agreed. I was just looking for a possible cheaper solution for GFO, but with buying it in bulk, it probably won't be much more of a savings in comparison to trying something new.


btkrausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/17/2010, 03:31 PM   #81
Anemone0524
Registered Member
 
Anemone0524's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NoVA
Posts: 434
after the new reactor, pump and bp cost, you may find it takes a few years to recover the savings from no GFO, PLUS, it may not be as effective as GFO.

And your system appears to be working anyways.

I switched from carbon and GFO to pellets because i still had algae growth and i was willing to shell out some cash to fix it. Still pending on those results though...


__________________
Aaron


150g rimless 60x30x20, ATI Sunpower x8, 2 48" Reefbrite Blue LED, MSX 200, Vortech MP40w x 2, BRS CA/ALK Dosers, Biopellets and GFO
Anemone0524 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/17/2010, 03:37 PM   #82
Fig
Registered Member
 
Fig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 817
You'll never recover " the savings" in the reef hobby.


Fig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/17/2010, 05:49 PM   #83
sedor
Registered Member
 
sedor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,689
Quote:
After reading a couple long threads, and knowing that my P04 isn't high at all, I'm not sure that pellets would benefit me. I drip Kalk every night, which looks to keep my P in check. I have absolutely no algae growth anywhere.
Kalkwasser does not affect PO4 it merely maintains a stable levels of Ca and Alk. If you don't have nutrient issues than your right, pellets may not be a suitable candidate for your system, but I wanted to clarify that the kalk is not a replacement.

Quote:
after the new reactor, pump and bp cost, you may find it takes a few years to recover the savings from no GFO, PLUS, it may not be as effective as GFO.
You can use any reactor to run the biopellets and he mentioned he already had a BRS dual reactor. I use a maxi 1200 on my PM reactor and it does the job so in reality you could buy an entire setup including the pellets for around $100 and the pellets last about a year. GFO still needs a reactor and not only needs to be replaced more often, but its also quite a bit more expensive in the long run. I would however assume that some systems would benefit from running both the bio-pellets and gfo.

Quote:
You'll never recover " the savings" in the reef hobby.
Ain't that the truth!


__________________
Ryan
sedor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/18/2010, 06:03 PM   #84
GUILLO1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California Central Coast
Posts: 692
just got on the BP band wagon. I just added 1.5 ltrs of bio pellets into a reactor. Do you guys think its too much tumbling for the pellets?



GUILLO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/18/2010, 06:20 PM   #85
sedor
Registered Member
 
sedor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,689
Doesn't look like the pellets are flying around inside the reactor to much so I wouldn't say its to much. As long as they are moving and stirring around a little your good. Its not like carbon or GFO where the amount of flow makes a huge different unless its far to little.


__________________
Ryan
sedor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/20/2010, 09:00 PM   #86
GUILLO1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California Central Coast
Posts: 692
The Warner Marine Pellets are for reals. I've been fighting some cyano for many months which recently had turned kinda slimy. I couldn't get rid of it and I tried just about everything I could. I almost wiped out all my corals using that red slime remover. I tried lots of GFO, PhosGuard and carbon with no luck. I even tried an ATS algea turf scrubber. I didnt have the ATS set up long enough thats why it didnt work.

About 2 weeks ago I added 1/2 liter of WM ecobak pellets into a TLF reactor. About 3 days ago I recieved my Geo 420 reactor and I swithed the pellets from the TLF, plus I added 1 more liter. Yesterday I blasted all my rocks with a turkey baster and like always the tank looked really clean. By the next morning the slime would be back all over my tank. To my surprise today the tank is as clean as it was yesterday. I can also see where the cyano is dying off big time.


GUILLO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/24/2010, 02:05 AM   #87
funny718
Registered Member
 
funny718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 145
Just took the plunge and put 500ml of ecobak after 24 hour soak. Then this afternoon i loaded up my NextReef MR1 shorty Reactor with a maxi jet 1200 not sure if I can get away with this setup any thoughts? Thanx guys


__________________
I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.
Thomas A. Edison

Current Tank Info: 60g Cube, 20 Gal Sump, Reef Octopus Super 2000xp, MR1 Reactor, Two Mp40's, tunze osmolator, Neptune apex control and ecotech radion
funny718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/25/2010, 07:29 AM   #88
Jimmy Walls
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedor View Post
Kalkwasser does not affect PO4 it merely maintains a stable levels of Ca and Alk.
I have seen Kalkwasser lower phosphate. It does not happen as fast as with GFO but it you use it often it keeps it PO4 low. Here is an old article.

This section and number 3 in the summary cover it.

Phosphate Reduction via Calcium Phosphate Precipitation

http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-09/rhf/index.php

I plan to use the EcoBak, but think that dosing Kalkwasser has many benefits and Phosphate binding is one.


Jimmy Walls is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08/25/2010, 11:14 AM   #89
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
I've read that article. It doesn't say that limewater will precipitate phosphate. The effect you've seen might just be the effect of better coral growth due to a higher pH or better alkalinity and calcium levels.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/02/2010, 06:03 PM   #90
thirst
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,907
@ sedor, why do you suggest not running carbon + GFO along with the ecoPaK?


thirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/02/2010, 06:08 PM   #91
sedor
Registered Member
 
sedor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,689
Reading back over my posts I don't "not" suggest running carbon and/or gfo, I simply wanted to add that in some situations (and maybe all I haven't been running the pellets long enough to decide) gfo may not be needed at all. Of course it wouldn't hurt to run it, but I think a lot of folks have high hopes that pellets will dissolve the need for running gfo. Carbon on the other hand is a completely separate entity and IMO should be run with or without the pellets.


__________________
Ryan
sedor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/02/2010, 09:21 PM   #92
bluetang66
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ga.
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by funny718 View Post
Just took the plunge and put 500ml of ecobak after 24 hour soak. Then this afternoon i loaded up my NextReef MR1 shorty Reactor with a maxi jet 1200 not sure if I can get away with this setup any thoughts? Thanx guys
i was thinking about the same set up, i was wondering if the maxi jet would be enough pump for the shorty.


bluetang66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/03/2010, 05:32 AM   #93
TheFishMan65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,618
IIRC, the pellets use C, N and P in a fixed ratio (Renfield?). However, some food have a lot more P than can be used up because the system become N limited. So some system may require GFO to remove the last of the phosphate.


TheFishMan65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/15/2010, 05:54 PM   #94
OneReef
Reef Guru
 
OneReef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: the great South
Posts: 3,218
So, what is the consensus on filter socks or not with the biopellets?


OneReef is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/18/2010, 02:59 PM   #95
Costazul
Premium Member
 
Costazul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Guaynabo PR
Posts: 271
I’m assuming that the filter sock will pull lots of s@@@ from the tank alone with bacteria full of nitrate/phos. It is essential with BP, just my thought.


Costazul is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/20/2010, 01:57 PM   #96
jverna1
Registered Member
 
jverna1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Philly
Posts: 233
I have been using the bp's for a week now. I have them in a geo 420 reactor with a maxi jet 1200 pump. The first couple of days they were tumbling pretty good. I got home from work checked on the reactor and they were hardly tumbling. I shook the reactor and the pellet have this caked on slime. Does anybody else have this problem? I do have the reactor about four feet above my sump. Maybe its just not enough flow?


jverna1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/20/2010, 04:19 PM   #97
TheFishMan65
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,618
I have read that this is normal. They should start tumbling again in a few days.


TheFishMan65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/20/2010, 05:58 PM   #98
sedor
Registered Member
 
sedor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,689
The slime building up in the reactor is normal at first. Its the same slime that accumulated on your glass walls and plumbing when you vodka dose. That's the beauty of bio pellets is that its all contained neatly in the reactor.

As far as needing to use a filter sock in conjunction with BP's I don't think its a must. In fact its a completely separate form of filtration. It may help pull some of the junk from the output of the reactor, but its best to aim the output towards the input of the skimmer anyways.


__________________
Ryan
sedor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/23/2010, 02:35 PM   #99
staggeringwade
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Helena, MT
Posts: 69
I just ordered 1000ml of ecobak for my 120 gallon tank which includes about 40 gallons in the sump. I plan to add ecobak slowly.
I already have a BRS dual reactor that runs off of my sump pump return manifold so I can easily adjust flow from 100 gph to 600.
I did just replace my Lifereef Skimmer with a EuroReef 6 weeks ago. There is no comparison there, the euro reef is kicking butt at pulling junk out.
I kinda thought that my HA would start to fade with having a better skimmer.
My nitrates are zero, my phosphates are barely noticeable on the crappy drip tests. (which means I have a phosphate issue)
(I also ordered a hanna phosphate checker).
I have been running a Turf algae scrubber for 18 months and it grows 2+ pounds of crap a week, but I still have hair algae growing like crazy. I'm using a DSB of 6" too.
I also utilize kalkwasser with my ATO.
I really would like to see my hair algae die off and get rid of the Turf Scrubber.
It seems counter productive to install a DIY LED array replacing 900 watts of electricity burned up with MH and still continue to use 6 each 60 watt CF 20 hrs a day to make algae grow on a screen.
I have only 6 small fish and I don't overfeed them.
My corals seem to be better off with LEDS. Lots of the frags have gone from ugly brown to blues & green.


staggeringwade is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09/23/2010, 06:41 PM   #100
triguy
Registered Member
 
triguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLO1 View Post
The Warner Marine Pellets are for reals. I've been fighting some cyano for many months which recently had turned kinda slimy. I couldn't get rid of it and I tried just about everything I could. I almost wiped out all my corals using that red slime remover. I tried lots of GFO, PhosGuard and carbon with no luck. I even tried an ATS algea turf scrubber. I didnt have the ATS set up long enough thats why it didnt work.

About 2 weeks ago I added 1/2 liter of WM ecobak pellets into a TLF reactor. About 3 days ago I recieved my Geo 420 reactor and I swithed the pellets from the TLF, plus I added 1 more liter. Yesterday I blasted all my rocks with a turkey baster and like always the tank looked really clean. By the next morning the slime would be back all over my tank. To my surprise today the tank is as clean as it was yesterday. I can also see where the cyano is dying off big time.
Just curious why you switched from the TLF reactor. Were they not tumbling good in there?

I just added 250ml yesterday. I have them in a single BRS reactor, which I was running GFO and Carbon in. I was thinking of getting a used TLF reactor for the pellets and keep continue with the GFO and carbon in the BRS reactor. I also don't know if the pellets work this quickly, but I have quite a lot of hair algae on my overflow, and today it looks white and appears to be dying.


triguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solid carbon biodegradable polymer pellets craze. PowermanKW The Reef Chemistry Forum 30 09/27/2010 01:17 PM
Sulfur Denitrator vs. Solid Carbon Pellets MeuserReef The Reef Chemistry Forum 0 06/07/2010 09:42 PM
Carbon source for denitrifying bacteria Navyblue The Reef Chemistry Forum 131 09/24/2006 12:48 PM
carbon source? 3D-Reef The Reef Chemistry Forum 2 02/21/2006 10:54 AM
vinegar as carbon source? mogurnda Marine Plants & Macroalgae 11 10/17/2005 10:00 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.