|
12/12/2017, 11:23 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 50
|
Sand or bare bottom
I’m confused? Which is best?
|
12/13/2017, 12:22 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Antioch,CALIFORNIA
Posts: 1,091
|
Me personally prefer bare
|
12/13/2017, 05:45 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
|
Depends on your definition of "best"...
For the most part having "sand" provides more benefits than bare bottom. -Vastly increased surface area for beneficial bacterial growth.. -Home for millions of beneficial microorganisms/worms/snails,etc... -Feeding grounds for sand sifting critters.. fish/snails,etc... IMO a bare bottom tank looks silly/unnatural and just the massive loss in surface area hurts the performance of a tank far more than being able to easily siphon detritus out benefits it.. I think those people also think a sand bed is just a ticking time bomb waiting to go bad..
__________________
Who me? |
12/13/2017, 06:09 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,923
|
Personally I like the look of sand. Whether one is better over the other for long term success, I will defer to others.
|
12/13/2017, 09:14 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 569
|
Mixed reef and reefs with fish - go sand.
SPS only - go bare, it's easier to keep clean. |
12/13/2017, 11:49 AM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 705
|
The only reason I'd go bare bottom is in an sps tank to have tons of flow and not kick sand around. I have sps, and live with a little less flow, but my sand still moves and I wish it didnt.
|
12/13/2017, 02:33 PM | #7 |
Moved On
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: auburn CA
Posts: 4,021
|
Both.
It depends on how you maintain your tank. To high a flow and sand will flow everywhere. many people run faux sand which is just sand covered expoxy. I like a DSB but it is like a capacitor, it has a 5-7 year life span before it requires attention. While it works it helps maintain my current bioload that a BB will not do. Benefit of BB is the ability to have higher flow amounts and to be able to clean detritus easier, if not self cleaning keeping particles suspended instead of settling into a sand bed |
12/13/2017, 08:46 PM | #8 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 686
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk |
|
12/14/2017, 12:02 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Antioch,CALIFORNIA
Posts: 1,091
|
Either way bare or sand all looks good
|
12/14/2017, 12:16 AM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Antioch,CALIFORNIA
Posts: 1,091
|
Nice tank
|
12/14/2017, 08:31 AM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,208
|
I love the look of sand, but decided to go bare bottom on my tank and I will never go back to sand. My tank stays much cleaner, don't have to worry about flow, and my nutrient control is much easier maintained without sand. It is also a nice clean look. I went with a white starboard plastic for the bottom, but I also know of people that put a reef safe glue on it, and then put a thin layer of sand over the glue. Let it dry and then place in the tank. This will give the illusion of a sand bed, when really the tank is bare-bottom.
__________________
Kevin Current Tank Info: Waterbox 50g, Tunze 9004 dc skimmer, Vortech mp10, Kessil ap700 |
12/14/2017, 09:57 AM | #12 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,055
|
Quote:
|
|
12/14/2017, 11:14 AM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Glocester, RI
Posts: 3,336
|
barebottom looks stupid, yup I said it, come at me
__________________
My build thread: http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2548422 Current Tank Info: 65 gallon mixed reef, Eshopps sump and HOB overflow, RO-110int skimmer, Reefbreeder 32" photons V1. |
12/14/2017, 11:24 AM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 462
|
Have One bare, one sand. Both do well but find the BB is so much easier to maintain from a husbandry standpoint. I like the look of both. Live in a Condo and rent so if I ever move, the BB will be so much less likely to cause a problem from all the crap that is in a sand bed being stirred up. Good luck
Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk |
12/14/2017, 11:34 AM | #15 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,957
|
Preference; for some BB gives the perception of being “clean” and can allow for more mechanical filtration, for others the look and fauna capacity from sand are essential, and prefer more natural methods of nutrient balance. Also depends on the tank inhabitants, some types of filter feeders and burrowers may require, or do better with sand.
Other considerations too, like I would probably go BB on any acrylic tank, scratches!
__________________
80g Aiptasia dominated reef tank.. with fish and now a bunch of berghia! Current Tank Info: 80g tank, re-starting a reef after a zoanthid nudibranch plauge, followed by months of steady and unstoppable STN/RTN, crashed; stayed FOWLR for a couple years, currently an aiptasia dominated reef tank with fishies and BERGHIA Last edited by HBtank; 12/14/2017 at 11:41 AM. |
|
|