Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 05/04/2012, 12:25 PM   #1
eric w
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 72
Salinity #

Hi all,

My tank has been running for about a week now and has held steady at 1.024....been reading and seems like it should be at 1.026....What should I be at? Thanks


eric w is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 12:38 PM   #2
shiladitya1991
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: India
Posts: 376
sp gr. should be 1.026 precisely.


shiladitya1991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 12:42 PM   #3
Chris Lakies
Registered Member
 
Chris Lakies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Grand Blanc Michigan
Posts: 1,446
What are u testing with? If it is a swing arm type hydrometer i would suggest getting a refractometer. Hydrometers can be hit or miss on accuracy.


__________________
CL

Current Tank Info: 50 breeder, 2 x XR15w pro (G4), 1 x MP40wQD, Apex JR, Ehiem-Jager 200 watt heater, Jabao DC6000 return, Reef Octo 150 elite SSS skimmer
Chris Lakies is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 12:43 PM   #4
aimmia
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 133
i have my tank at 1.026-1.027. I find that my corals like it there the best.


aimmia is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 12:58 PM   #5
Randy Holmes-Farley
Reef Chemist
 
Randy Holmes-Farley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 86,233
I doubt you'll notice much difference between sg = 1.024 and sg = 1.026, but I see no reason to not target the higher level as it is close to the typical ocean salinity.


__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley

Current Tank Info: 120 mixed reef
Randy Holmes-Farley is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 02:07 PM   #6
eric w
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 72
Im using a refrac...was told 1.024 was a good number..hear so many different things...so would a little higher be better?


eric w is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 02:09 PM   #7
Randy Holmes-Farley
Reef Chemist
 
Randy Holmes-Farley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 86,233
There's no rational that makes sense for keeping it lower except lower salt costs.

Here's my rational...

Reef Aquarium Water Parameters
http://www.reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-05/rhf/index.htm

from it:

Salinity

There are a variety of different ways to measure and report salinity, including conductivity probes, refractometers, and hydrometers. They typically report values for specific gravity (which is unitless) or salinity (in units of ppt or parts per thousand, roughly corresponding to the number of grams of dry salt in 1 kg of the water), although conductivity (in units of mS/cm, milliSiemens per centimeter) is sometimes used.

Somewhat surprisingly, aquarists do not always use units that naturally follow from their measurement technique (specific gravity for hydrometers, refractive index for refractometers, and conductivity for conductivity probes) but rather use the units interchangeably.

For reference, natural ocean water has a salinity of about 35 ppt, corresponding to a specific gravity of about 1.0264 and a conductivity of 53 mS/cm.

As far as I know, there is little real evidence that keeping a coral reef aquarium at anything other than natural levels is preferable. It appears to be common practice to keep marine fish, and in many cases reef aquaria, at somewhat lower than natural salinity levels. This practice stems, at least in part, from the belief that fish are less stressed at reduced salinity. Substantial misunderstandings also arise among aquarists as to how specific gravity really relates to salinity, especially considering temperature effects.

Ron Shimek has discussed salinity on natural reefs in a previous article. His recommendation, and mine as well, is to maintain salinity at a natural level. If the organisms in the aquarium are from brackish environments with lower salinity, or from the Red Sea with higher salinity, selecting something other than 35 ppt may make good sense. Otherwise, I suggest targeting a salinity of 35 ppt (specific gravity = 1.0264; conductivity = 53 mS/cm).


__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley

Current Tank Info: 120 mixed reef
Randy Holmes-Farley is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 04:02 PM   #8
eric w
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 72
Thanks


eric w is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 05:09 PM   #9
Randy Holmes-Farley
Reef Chemist
 
Randy Holmes-Farley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 86,233


Happy Reefing.


__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley

Current Tank Info: 120 mixed reef
Randy Holmes-Farley is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05/04/2012, 10:53 PM   #10
shiladitya1991
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: India
Posts: 376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Holmes-Farley View Post


Happy Reefing.
Randy,you have a PM.


shiladitya1991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.