Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 12/19/2017, 04:49 PM   #1
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Phosphates

How high is too high before it becomes detrimental to sps?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 04:52 PM   #2
five.five-six
Registered Member
 
five.five-six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Corona
Posts: 7,827
Blog Entries: 6
If you are going for growth, anecdotal evidence is that it's much higher than if you are going for color. How high are your phospates?


__________________
Originally posted by yellowslayer13:

"I hate that hole"

Current Tank Info: SCMAS Member 225 peninsula euroreef RS180 Apex 400W X 3 20k radiums / Spectra mixed SPS
five.five-six is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 05:02 PM   #3
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Phosphates

Not sure as Hanna ulr only goes up to .619

They were down around .4 until I used reef roids and it gumed up the filter on my return pump.

The tank is 5 months old as well. I don’t like to use gfo, but looks like I may have to, in order to get them lower.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 05:06 PM   #4
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Also have absolutely no algae in the dt either, my cuc and fish don’t allow it to take hold luckily.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 05:31 PM   #5
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pslreefer View Post
The tank is 5 months old as well. I don’t like to use gfo, but looks like I may have to, in order to get them lower.
Or just stop overfeeding/reduce feedings..
Either that or your rock is leaching it.. Pukani?

But I wouldn't suggest anyone feed corals at all with such a new tank..
Most new tanks simply cannot handle the load..


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 05:50 PM   #6
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Phosphates

Ya, been feeding heavier due to a moorish Idol and newer powder brown, but they are eating heartily now and fattening up, so I can cut back.

Not sure on the rock it’s a mix of brs dry rock from 2 years ago to rock I bought for my first tank in 2007 and a few pieces I’ve picked up along the way.

I did do a bleach bath on the rock when I set this tank up in July however.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 05:59 PM   #7
mcgyvr
Registered Member
 
mcgyvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 20,050
well.. sounds like you know what to do.


__________________
Who me?
mcgyvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 06:12 PM   #8
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
I agree that some GFO might be a reasonable idea to try. That's a rather high phosphate level. We get conflicting reports on the effect of phosphate on stony corals, but I'd definitely work on lowering the level if I had stony corals in the system. If GFO gets pricey, there are ways to regenerate it, or switching to lanthanum chloride might be appropriate.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 06:22 PM   #9
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Phosphates

That is certainly an issue as there is no concrete evidence of po4 levels on sps. Stability has proven to be more of a factor than anything. Obviously there has to be a cap at which too much is just too much.

But there is so much conflicting info out there it’s difficult at times to determine what’s “best.”

I do however prefer natural methods over chemicals


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 06:58 PM   #10
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
Carbon dosing might be able to reduce the level, as well, although some nitrate dosing might be required.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/19/2017, 07:14 PM   #11
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertoni View Post
Carbon dosing might be able to reduce the level, as well, although some nitrate dosing might be required.


I thought about that as my nitrates are very very low


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 06:42 AM   #12
Optionman
Registered Member
 
Optionman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 774
Phosphates

My 20 month old reef runs high phosphates, averaging .60 using Hanna 713 checker. My sps growth has been good (I think) but I assume my colors aren’t as good as if I ran low phosphates. Here are pictures of 3 sps growth from 5/28/17, 11/5/17 and 12/12/17. Not sure if this is good growth or not since I’ve never had sps before.
B551CF32-334C-4BDF-A981-3450F4CE18C1.jpgORG_DSC01969.jpgIMG_5678.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Last edited by Optionman; 12/20/2017 at 06:50 AM.
Optionman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 06:55 AM   #13
VoltzNSalt
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Higher than the Mile High City
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pslreefer View Post
Also have absolutely no algae in the dt either
Yet...


VoltzNSalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 08:32 AM   #14
five.five-six
Registered Member
 
five.five-six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Corona
Posts: 7,827
Blog Entries: 6
If you just put 1.5-2 pounds of live rock per gallon in your tank you can never have too much phosphate no mater how much you feed.


__________________
Originally posted by yellowslayer13:

"I hate that hole"

Current Tank Info: SCMAS Member 225 peninsula euroreef RS180 Apex 400W X 3 20k radiums / Spectra mixed SPS
five.five-six is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 08:58 AM   #15
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
I have a lot of rock!







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 09:01 AM   #16
five.five-six
Registered Member
 
five.five-six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Corona
Posts: 7,827
Blog Entries: 6
Obviously you don't have enough live rock because with 1.5 to 2 lb of live rock per gallon you can feed all you want and you won't have problems with nitrates or phosphates


__________________
Originally posted by yellowslayer13:

"I hate that hole"

Current Tank Info: SCMAS Member 225 peninsula euroreef RS180 Apex 400W X 3 20k radiums / Spectra mixed SPS
five.five-six is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 09:06 AM   #17
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
It was all bleached so started as dry rock and dry sand as well. The only “live” anything I used was a couple cups of sand in the sump from the beach which I took from under the water not the actual dry sand.
It would most likely be just not established enough to handle the feeding load?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 10:26 AM   #18
reefgeezer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 2,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by five.five-six View Post
Obviously you don't have enough live rock because with 1.5 to 2 lb of live rock per gallon you can feed all you want and you won't have problems with nitrates or phosphates
??????


__________________
John,

Current Tank Info: In-process, 90 Gallon SPS Reef
reefgeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 10:54 AM   #19
clevername
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manchester, MO
Posts: 1,125
That looks like a new tank, i would run some GFO to keep it down until the live bacteria starts to grow. Average time for critical bacteria is 22 days. I would give it 60 days until its stable


clevername is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 10:55 AM   #20
clevername
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manchester, MO
Posts: 1,125
Also just an FYI, id keep an eye out for that right side of the tank. Direct sunlight is killer on new tanks. Perfect spot for algea to take over.


clevername is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 10:59 AM   #21
pbradley0
Registered Member
 
pbradley0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by five.five-six View Post
Obviously you don't have enough live rock because with 1.5 to 2 lb of live rock per gallon you can feed all you want and you won't have problems with nitrates or phosphates

What?
Are you suggesting that live rock exports nutrients?


pbradley0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 02:30 PM   #22
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Here is with lights on. Weird, but absolutely not s strand of algae. I went through 2 bouts of gha, at about the 1.5 month mark and 3 month mark. I ran gfo after the cycle and got all the gha out plus the idol loves eating the stuff!

Today light feeding of frozen for the smaller fish and s little piece of nori for the tang and idol. I have to keep nori in the tank as the pbt is not eating frozen or pelleted yet, and there isn’t enough gha in my rock to sustain it either.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 02:33 PM   #23
Pslreefer
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbradley0 View Post
What?
Are you suggesting that live rock exports nutrients?


Back in the day that is what was thought, so that’s partially where the 2lbs of rock per gallon came from.

It was thought that the bacteria and such in the rock would “eat” po4 and nitrates I believe, hence the need for good established live rock.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Pslreefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 04:18 PM   #24
reefgeezer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 2,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pslreefer View Post
...It was thought that the bacteria and such in the rock would “eat” po4 and nitrates I believe, hence the need for good established live rock.
Under certain conditions the organisms in and on mature live rock will process nitrate and phosphate. In a properly balanced mature system it will control nutrients.


__________________
John,

Current Tank Info: In-process, 90 Gallon SPS Reef
reefgeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12/20/2017, 06:12 PM   #25
bertoni
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA
Posts: 88,616
Live rock seems to support denitrification, which can export nitrogen without net consumption of phosphorus. It possibly can export phosphate as the skimmable byproducts of bacterial growth.


__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
bertoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.