|
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 208
|
Calcium Reactor?
Is a Calcium Reactor for a 29 gallon tank a necessity for SPS corals? If so, could someone recommend a suitable reactor, and some of the benefits of having one?
Thanks, Nikee. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 280
|
No I would stick to dosing 2 part. A reactor on such a small tank volume would be very hard to dial in and get it to run correctly. I have mainly SPS in my biocube and just use two part for cal and alk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 64
|
great question Nikee, I was thinking about purchasing one for mine but was not sure. Reef Newb what do you think would be the min tank size for a reactor. I have about 16 gallons of refuge but was thinking of adding more. Just to pick your brain
__________________
Paul Current Tank Info: 29 gallon rimless reef |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 280
|
NIkee1404-
no 1 or 2 SPS frags will not need much in terms of calcium. I would bet that until they mature into large colonies that regular water changes would probably be able to keep up with the calcium demand. Fish Outa Water- I would say its not really about there being a min. size tank but more of problem with keeping up with the demand of the corals. I dont think that we nano keeper could pack enough SPS corals in our nano tanks to neccesitate using a reactor. But that is just my opinion. I know that large tanks with tons of SPS and clams could still use two part to tend to their calc and alk needs but they would be going through gallons of the stuff per month, which would get costly. I am about to set up a 60 gallon tank and I will be using kalkwasser in the top off as well as dosing 2 part and I think that will be adequite for the calc needs. I honestly dont think a calcium reactor would be neccessary for anything smaller than a 100 gallon tank. But I do believe there is always exceptions to that rule. It is more dependant on the indivduals SPS size and demand. Sorry for the long winded post.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 208
|
Thanks for the help ReefNewb. Much appreciated!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 2,170
|
I have a 30-gallon reef that is full of mostly Montipora, a couple Acropora, and some Acans. I will be plumbing my 50-gallon sump soon and I plan to set up a dual chamber calcium reactor that I once used on a 75-gallon softie tank.
It may not be necessary to use a calcium reactor on a nano tank, but once you get one dialed in, it maintains steady alkilinity and calcium levels. I found that after I had my reactor up and running, I did not need to do as much testing for alkilinity and calcium. So if you have a larger nano with lots of calcium hungry coral, a calcium reactor may be a good option for you. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 14,180
|
Quote:
We need to remember (IMO) big tank principles apply to us little tank owners too. That is why I put a Ca Rx on there back in 2002...why not do a big skimmer, ca rx, 400w MH on a 20H? Big tanks can do it why not little? Same principles just a smaller volume of water Ran a My Reef Creations reactor...I believe this was the first "nano" one he made Lunchbucket
__________________
Trying to lose weight by walking is like trying to bake a cake w/ a cigarette lighter - Lunchbucket - "Nancy-Boy Extraordinaire" - maxxII- Current Tank Info: 58gal Oceanic RR, 2x400w MH (20k XM and 10k XM), Deltec PF601 Ca Rx, Deltec AP701 skimmer, mag950 return, iwaki 55rlt w/ an Oceansmotions 4-way unit, Tunze 7300 and 6000 each w/ controller, fluidized po4 rx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 14,180
|
Quote:
My whole goal (which is what we want) is stability. The greater the stability the better the corals do. Dosing all or 1/2 of you two part isn't as effective as dosing from a reactor all day
__________________
Trying to lose weight by walking is like trying to bake a cake w/ a cigarette lighter - Lunchbucket - "Nancy-Boy Extraordinaire" - maxxII- Current Tank Info: 58gal Oceanic RR, 2x400w MH (20k XM and 10k XM), Deltec PF601 Ca Rx, Deltec AP701 skimmer, mag950 return, iwaki 55rlt w/ an Oceansmotions 4-way unit, Tunze 7300 and 6000 each w/ controller, fluidized po4 rx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
A Pico Vase Guy
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,652
|
Quote:
my 20h is a serious PITA to keep up with just kalk...i find i have to add buffers everyone and a while to keep everything good, mind you i only lose about 1/2g or so in evap a day...if i were losing more then i might be able to keep up with the demand..stability is the key here for any tank...a Calcium reactor is the best thing you can do for any tank in my mind...continually stable parameters...add some mag pellets in there and pretty much never have to worry about ionic imbalance... use your WC to replace the trace elements..and remove waste water.. i am in th eprocess of a DIY Cal reactor for my tank now...i dont need a big one....so a DIY makes sense... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 280
|
Your right like I said there are exceptions and it all depends on your setup. for me and my biocube 29 with tons of SPS and clams all of witch are small frags I get away with using kalk and dosing two part daily when they grow into colonies I will use more two part but I think that until your demand gets overwhelming for two part then a calc reactor is not neccessary. Just my opinion. I agree with big tank principals applying to small tanks as well...but some things are just not neccessary in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 208
|
At the moment I intend on keeping 2 or 3 SPS and lots of ricordeas. What type of calcium reactor would be sufficient for a 30g tank? Could someone explain to me what kind of reactor and CO2 I would need. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
A Pico Vase Guy
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,652
|
dosing is expensive no matter how you look at it...a low demand system with a reactor may last a year or more with a given amount of media...i am sure you would go through more 2 part trying to keep things constant...then there is the constant testing to see if your dosing too much two part or not...a lot less testing involved in a reactor setup...
sure there is a greater capital cost but it far out weighs that n the long run.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 208
|
Ok...so Ive decided i'll go ahead and invest in a calcium reactor. What reactor would anyone recommend?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salida, CA
Posts: 75
|
I am using a calcium reactor on my 29 gallon SPS reef. I looked into a lot of reactors but settled on one from a company in Kansas called Aquatic Systems Design. It is called CaRxNano and it is designed for small systems. It has been working out very well for me.
__________________
<>< <>< <>< Robert Current Tank Info: 29 Gallon |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 64
|
Reefr rob was the rx easy to set up?
__________________
Paul Current Tank Info: 29 gallon rimless reef |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,467
|
I would just dose "2-part"
Alot easier and of cheaper. "dosing is expensive no matter how you look at it...a low demand system with a reactor may last a year or more with a given amount of media...i am sure you would go through more 2 part trying to keep things constant...then there is the constant testing to see if your dosing too much two part or not...a lot less testing involved in a reactor setup..." Keep dreaming buddy if you think a reactor is easier than 2-part and you do not have to test once you have it set up. So, you are justifying spending 500 beans to set up a reactor on a low demand system ? You could easily meet the demands by just performing more frequent water changes and topping off with lime water Dosing is really expensive, that is if your dosing a 200 + gallon system. On a Nano it does not get easier, or cheaper.... Answer me this question...how is baking soda and dowflake expensive if you are going through a gallon every 2 months or so. Just an FYI ...to make a gallon of Alk it cost me around a dollar... the cal part cost me nothing because I still have a 5 gallon bucket of the stuff left over from a purchase i made around 2 + years ago. Last edited by jman77; 11/28/2008 at 12:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
A Pico Vase Guy
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,652
|
Quote:
i dose limewater at 1/2 g a day and add 1 oz of both DIY cal and ALK additives almost daily as the kalk dosent keep up at current evap rates...which means i test every 3 or four days to make sure things arent going astray...you telling me that is easier then setting up a CaRx and testing once a month? i cant wait to get a reactor, if i did it all again i would set it up from the start and never have to worry....the Media isnt what costs a lot it is your time and test kits...both of which are taken up far more rapidly if you are doing it all manually..i too have a 50# bag of dow flakes in the garage for the last two years...and it will be around for another ten at the current rate i use it... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,467
|
Yes it is easier
Well, apparently you do not have a "Low Demand" system.... that is, if your orginal use of the term "Low Demand" was to descibe the calcium use of a system. One fluid ounce of each is nothing, try dosing 4 of each like i do for my 120g (and I still stick with 2-part) I hope you the best with the Reactor, but you can easily set up a pair of dosing pumps & a Timer, and automate the dosing process process. http://www.plantedtank.net/articles/...sing-Pumps/21/ Setup a autotop off and a DIY KalkReactor and not worry how much the system uses, as it is taken care of. http://www.autotopoff.com/ I don't understand what could be fluctuating so greatly in your system that you can't get a baseline of what you should does, and have to test every 4 days. Getting a Calcium Reactor is not going to fix that problem, it's not going to automatically adjust depending on your uptake, if anything you are going to have more problems as your have to dial it in ever four days ... and that's not as easy as the 2-part solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salida, CA
Posts: 75
|
Fish:
Yes it is very easy to set up. The unit is very well made. You will need a feed pump - I recommend a maxijet 400. It has a pH probe port just like their larger reactors. I got them to send me enough reactor media to get it started (gen-x size). I am running my CO2 at about 12 bubbles per minute.
__________________
<>< <>< <>< Robert Current Tank Info: 29 Gallon |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Willow Park, TX
Posts: 175
|
I've been wondering about adding a calcium reactor to my new tank setup...just have no idea where to start in selecting one. Plus, I'm not sure what the demand is going to be on this new tank....so, I'm waiting to see.
__________________
Been Obsessed with Saltwater since 2004! Current Tank Info: 120g reef tank w/ 18g cube tank, 18g refugium, 30g sump, and 40 gallon frag tank all tied into the same system. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 14,180
|
what pump do you guys use to feed your reactors? I've always ran a pump from the sump to the reactor and back to the sump. Now I'm going from the tank...down to the reactor and back up
Lunchbucket
__________________
Trying to lose weight by walking is like trying to bake a cake w/ a cigarette lighter - Lunchbucket - "Nancy-Boy Extraordinaire" - maxxII- Current Tank Info: 58gal Oceanic RR, 2x400w MH (20k XM and 10k XM), Deltec PF601 Ca Rx, Deltec AP701 skimmer, mag950 return, iwaki 55rlt w/ an Oceansmotions 4-way unit, Tunze 7300 and 6000 each w/ controller, fluidized po4 rx |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|