|
01/22/2010, 06:07 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 110
|
Phosphate remover
It's time to buy some new phosphate remover. Whats the best? I've used Warner Marine PHOSaR in the past and it worked well. But I'm willing to try something new.
How is Bulk Reef Supplys GFO? It's certainly cheaper. |
01/22/2010, 06:14 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Grove City, Ohio
Posts: 10,806
|
IMO, you can't beat BRS for price or service. get your carbon there too.
__________________
I'll try to be nice if you try to be smarter! I can't help that I grow older, but you can't make me grow up! Current Tank Info: 120 mixed reef with 40b sump, RO 150 skimmer, AI Sol Blue x 2, and a 60g Frag Tank with 100g rubbermaid sump. 2 x Kessil A360w lights, BM curve 5 skimmer |
01/22/2010, 06:47 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 199
|
+1 on brs
|
01/22/2010, 08:17 PM | #4 |
ReefKeeping Mag staff
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,423
|
They are all the same the only difference is price.
__________________
Brian June 2013 TOTM Current Tank Info: 270 Starphire by Miracles in Glass*BK 250 Internal*Sequence Blackfin 1800*(2) 6105 Tunzes Streams*(3) 400 watt Blueline E-Ballast*400w 20k Radiums*(3) Lumanarc III*GEO 624 Ca Reactor*Tunze Osmolotor*PM SR45 and TLF PhosBan Reactor 150*Apex |
01/22/2010, 08:41 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 93
|
What is BRS??
|
01/22/2010, 08:42 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 296
|
bulkreefsupply.com
LOVE them! |
01/22/2010, 08:46 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 93
|
Thanks
|
01/22/2010, 08:48 PM | #8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gloversville , ny
Posts: 157
|
|
01/23/2010, 11:41 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 110
|
Thanks for the replies. Whats better granules or pellets?
|
01/23/2010, 11:42 AM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 110
|
I'll be using it in a TLF reactor.
|
01/23/2010, 03:33 PM | #11 |
ReefKeeping Mag staff
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,423
|
Pellets are better, they are harder than granules and they contain less dust.
__________________
Brian June 2013 TOTM Current Tank Info: 270 Starphire by Miracles in Glass*BK 250 Internal*Sequence Blackfin 1800*(2) 6105 Tunzes Streams*(3) 400 watt Blueline E-Ballast*400w 20k Radiums*(3) Lumanarc III*GEO 624 Ca Reactor*Tunze Osmolotor*PM SR45 and TLF PhosBan Reactor 150*Apex |
01/23/2010, 04:56 PM | #12 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NJ, shore
Posts: 4,376
|
I have tried almost every GFO out there at 1 point or another. I found BRS HC to be the best out of the other common types. And by a wide margin. But I have never tried there regular GFO. Once I tried the HC I saw no reason to stop using it.
__________________
Matt, 65G reef tank Current Tank Info: 65g reef, mix of sps, lps, few softies. Hoping to upgrade within the year. |
01/23/2010, 06:29 PM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,081
|
|
01/23/2010, 06:44 PM | #14 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: hampton roads, va
Posts: 1,799
|
Quote:
Phosar HC= BRS HC= Bayoxide® E33HC SmartReef RemPhos=BRS granules= Bayoxide® E33 if you want something "different" try one of the hydrated ferric hydroxides (pura phoslock, rowaphos, kent power phos). they ALL claim to outperform the dry medias. Mangrove Pura Phoslock in particular makes a bold claim right on their website: "Recently appearing on the pet markets granulated and palletized medias based on Bayoxide E33 product are about 14% less effective in removing phosphate and release 270 mg of iron per gram of media – that is staggering 13500 times more than PhosLock." On Kents Power Phos bottle: " More effective than similar products sold in dry form" and well all know RowaPhos claims to outperform all other phosphate removal medias or at least use to. While I cant verify any claims its hard to believe all three would boldly claim to be superior without any supporting data of the hydrated medias having some form of quantifiable advantage (that combined with I never really see the dry GFO's making these claims beyond hydrodynamics of pelletized form opposed to actual absorbtion ability). I said "different" because I've used all forms except pelletized (dont see any advantage using pelletized in a reactor) and havent seen any performance differences. some are dustier (all hydrated ones which seems odd), some break up easier when tumbled (phosban), some less uniform in granules size (kent powerphos) but on the hobbiest level I dont think you can tell any performance difference from one to the next and if you could nothing adding a little more of the inferior media wont equalize. Last edited by stanlalee; 01/23/2010 at 06:51 PM. |
|
01/23/2010, 10:09 PM | #15 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,186
|
Quote:
__________________
Steve ---------------------------------- Current Tank Info: 2 separate 250G bowfront rimless ELOS tanks plumbed to 260G sump, 220G refugium, 220G frag, BK DeLuxe 300, 400W MH x4, closed loops, 3/4hp chiller x2, Phos reactor, Kalk reactor, Charcoal reactor, Ca reactor, 60G surge tanks, & a huge elec bill |
|
01/24/2010, 07:43 AM | #16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 93
|
Can I use any of this products on a canister or hang filter (Penguin)??
I don't have any reactor on my reef tank or filter sock (no sump installed). |
|
|