Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > Coral Forums > SPS Keepers
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 05/27/2003, 03:52 PM   #1
ssungyo
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 63
ENOUGH light for my SPS?!!

After getting mixed reviews and advice, i decided to purchase a 175 metal halide with a 14oooK bulb. Im starting to get the feeling that i need some more lighting for my sps corals to have the ideal lighting conditions. Ive built my own metal halide canopy that takes the bulb about 8 inches above the water. The tank is 24inches high. and the rocks go as high as the middle of my tank making the distance from the surface about 12 inches and the distance from the surface to the bulb, around 6-8 inches. so, when roughly estimated, the sps corals are around 20 inches below the metal halide. I always thought i was going to raise soft corals, but after looking at the sps tanks, out there, i have fallen in love with SPS. I just want to get some of your opinions. I think the lighting i have right now is good enough, but you all have more experience than i do, so let's here the criticism! THANX A MILLION IN ADVANCE!

Oh, btw, the tank is 24 long, 24 high, and 13 deep.

SSUNGYo


ssungyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/27/2003, 04:57 PM   #2
Pineapple House
Registered Member
 
Pineapple House's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 1,740
You could be able to keep small polyped scleractinians under your setup, although they wouldn't do as well under your bulb as they would under a 400wt bulb. I would try to keep the Scleractinians towards the upper area of the aquarium, for the fact that not much lighting travels to the bottom of the aquarium. The deeper the tank, the more intensity you'll need to illuminate the bottom of the tank.

Take Care,
Graham


__________________
RYAN'S LAW:
Make three correct guesses consecutively and you will establish yourself as an expert.

Current Tank Info: 300 gallons of water volume, 80 gallon refugium, 2x 1" seaswirls, 3x 400wt PFO HQI halides, Deltec 850 & Euro-Reef CS-82, Amp Master 3000 on closed loop, 200lbs liverock
Pineapple House is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/27/2003, 05:45 PM   #3
Zoanthus
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Zoanthus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 103
I’m keeping acropora and montipora, kind of with the same lighting. They aren’t actually directly under my 175. 10,000k But of to the side under a 2 foot 50/50 Vho and a small portion of a 6 foot actinic so they get a mixture of light. The light they are receiving is not as intense as the light directly under the 175 and they are growing fine. There is a picture of a before and after in my web page of the montipora and photos of my acroporas in my gallery. http://members.hometown.aol.com/benamadio/page2.html
the 175 should be ok but you may want to add some VHO to complement the metal halide.


Zoanthus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/27/2003, 06:10 PM   #4
DoomWeasel
Registered Member
 
DoomWeasel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West LA, CA
Posts: 704
That being said, your tank is not that deep. I don't think you will have a problem with the 175w, and should be able to keep many of the sps species. More intensity may be better, however, I don't see any reason to scrap this set up. Perhaps down the road if you feel they are not getting enough light, you can upgrade.


DoomWeasel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/27/2003, 08:33 PM   #5
Lunchbucket
Premium Member
 
Lunchbucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 14,180
i am sure you could keep them ok. some won't do as well...the more light loving ones. heck have a 24" deep tank w/ a 400w MH on it...i can keep ANYTHIGN!!!

Lunchbucket


__________________
Trying to lose weight by walking is like trying to bake a cake w/ a cigarette lighter
- Lunchbucket -

"Nancy-Boy Extraordinaire"
- maxxII-

Current Tank Info: 58gal Oceanic RR, 2x400w MH (20k XM and 10k XM), Deltec PF601 Ca Rx, Deltec AP701 skimmer, mag950 return, iwaki 55rlt w/ an Oceansmotions 4-way unit, Tunze 7300 and 6000 each w/ controller, fluidized po4 rx
Lunchbucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/27/2003, 08:53 PM   #6
kevinpo
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Spokane Valley WA
Posts: 3,535
Here is a picture of my A. yongei that I grew under 175W 14,000K bulb. The color looks OK to me? There are many other corals that will also do well (read colorful and good growth) you just need to be selective with type and placement.

Good luck,
Kevin
PS: I also had 4 - 110W VHO's on the tank.



__________________
SPS Guy

Current Tank Info: 600 reef (set up June 2001), with 125 gal refugium and 100 gal sump.
kevinpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/28/2003, 05:33 AM   #7
smiller
Premium Member
 
smiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 9,228
As Kevin just proved I have seen some really fine SPS tanks under 175s. Research what you buy and you will do well with your lighting. It is totally false that all SPS ned to be blasted with light. Some SPS actually do better under less lighting. A few of mine have done well under shade from other corals. Good luck!


__________________
Steve

It's good to learn from your experiences. It's better to learn from other's experiences.
smiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04/21/2006, 11:33 PM   #8
Ti
Registered Member
 
Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,977
175 is fine


__________________
Hair algae is my Macro algae.
Ti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04/22/2006, 09:00 AM   #9
SunnyX
Moved On
 
SunnyX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,133
Quote:
Originally posted by Ti
175 is fine
You do know that this thread is 3 YEARS OLD!!!!!


SunnyX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04/22/2006, 10:29 AM   #10
Ti
Registered Member
 
Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,977
Quote:
Originally posted by SunnyX
You do know that this thread is 3 YEARS OLD!!!!!
LOL



__________________
Hair algae is my Macro algae.
Ti is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM.


TapaTalk Enabled

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2013 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2011