Reef Central Online Community

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
Blogs FAQ Calendar

Notices

User Tag List

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 05/11/2011, 03:43 PM   #1
yeldarbj
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,295
Skimz SK181 - Quick Review

I've been using my new Skimz SK181 skimmer for a couple weeks now on my ~100g sps tank. I've been very impressed with it thus far. For those not familiar with it, this is what it looks like:



I purchased it directly from RC sponsor Aqua Digital. The box was extremely well packed, even had a bubble wrap "coccoon" on the outside of the box. I wouldn't hesitate to buy from them again. Great service and communication from Aqua Digital.

With the internal pump, the skimmer has a very small footprint, just over 8" x 8". The pump is very quiet and efficient, rated at only 12w. One unique feature of this skimmer is the output is at the bottom, under the pump. Water exits out a channel in the corner of the base of the skimmer. Here are a couple pictures that show this better.





Rather than a typical standpipe, it uses a gate valve to help regulate the water level in the skimmer body (as seen in the picture above). A screw at the top will raise and lower the gate. There is also an air valve if you choose to limit the air draw. Thus far, I've left the gate and air valve wide open, but the skimmer is also sitting fairly deep at 9 1/2".

The skimmer required almost no break in period. I did a quick soak and short run in a vinegar/water mix, rinsed it well, and placed it in the tank. I was expecting it to take several days to get going. After only 3 hours I realized that the SK181 was ready to go. This is the foam after 3 hours:



And here is the result after 4 days:


The tank has been going for a bit more than a year and a half. I originally used an I-Tech 200 with Tunze hydrofoamer. It's a great skimmer, but I finally came to the conclusion that it was too much for my tank (probably should have chosen the 100 from the start). I then used a Tunze 9010 which I had great success with on my previous tank (65g). I like the very small footprint of the Tunze, and it worked fine, but I felt like I might need more skimming power. That's when I discovered the Skimz line and after discussing with Aqua Digital, I chose to go with the SK181.

So after a couple weeks, I'm very impressed. The skimmer output is very consistent and has required zero tweaking. I think it's the right size for my tank. It's rated for anywhere from ~50g to ~200g. I would guess that this skimmer will be great on anything from ~75g to ~125 for reef tanks.


yeldarbj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/11/2011, 04:43 PM   #2
dustinc
Registered Member
 
dustinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Waxahachie, TX
Posts: 1,096
Great review! I just got mine installed on Saturday and love it. Im running mine in 6.5" of water and have the air almost all the way closed and gate valve almost the same and it's working great. Highly recommend this skimmer!


__________________
You might be too strong to surrender boy, but you're far too frail to fight!

Current Tank Info: 120 Planet
dustinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/11/2011, 04:55 PM   #3
NyReefNoob
skimmer freak
 
NyReefNoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: peekskill, ny
Posts: 1,209
plus one on the customer service from michael, i got the sm202


__________________
custom 45g cube all in one, ai hydra 26, 2 mp10w, ac jr. ,bubble magnus triple doser, bm nac5 hob skimmer

My dad always said the only stupid questions are the ones not asked

Current Tank Info: custom 45g cube AIO
NyReefNoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/12/2011, 06:12 PM   #4
moonpod
Premium Member
 
moonpod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: B.H., Los Angeles
Posts: 13,053
you can purchase directly from aqua-digital?


__________________
Excuses are just the nails for the house of failure.

Current Tank Info: 32" Leemar starfire cube now empty and not quite so stinky
moonpod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/12/2011, 06:22 PM   #5
yeldarbj
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,295
Yes, just contact Michael Hall, owner of Aqua Digital.


yeldarbj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/14/2011, 02:50 PM   #6
James77
Registered Member
 
James77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,158
How quiet is the pump..... Can it be heard outside the stand with no other equipment on?


__________________
Jim

Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef and 75g Freshwater
James77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/14/2011, 04:37 PM   #7
yeldarbj
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,295
I think the pump is very quiet. All I hear is the foaming action of the skimmer which I'm not sure you can totally avoid with any skimmer. There is no noticeable pump noise. Maybe dustinc will chime with his impression and compare it to the Bubble Blaster from his SRO XP 1000 SSS.


yeldarbj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/14/2011, 07:12 PM   #8
allsps40
Registered Member
 
allsps40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,627
Good review. How much did this skimmer cost you? I am looking to upgrade my skimmer for my current that but need one that will handle around 100g for a future tank upgrade. This is one of 3 skimmers I am looking at.


__________________
__________

Current Tank Info: Past reef tanks: 20H softy, 29G mixed reef, 55G mixed reef, 40B sps dominant mixed reef and 75G sps dominant mixed reef. No tank currently
allsps40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/14/2011, 08:38 PM   #9
dustinc
Registered Member
 
dustinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Waxahachie, TX
Posts: 1,096
The skimmer pump is silent. It is the quietest skimmer pump I've had. The bubble blaster was pretty quiet but still a small noise and with this one it has no hum.


__________________
You might be too strong to surrender boy, but you're far too frail to fight!

Current Tank Info: 120 Planet
dustinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05/14/2011, 08:43 PM   #10
James77
Registered Member
 
James77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,158
Thanks yeldarbj and dustinc.


__________________
Jim

Current Tank Info: 120g Mixed Reef and 75g Freshwater
James77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/20/2011, 08:04 PM   #11
Myka
Reefing since '93
 
Myka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 2,436
Could you guys please state which skimmers you have used in the past? Reviews are always relative! =]

I'm considering the Skimz Kone SK181 for my ~100 reef. I have a EuroReef RS-180 on there right now that I'm not happy with (performs well, but is really noisy and likes to overflow). I have a SWC Cone on my nano that I really like, and the Skimz is a really similar design.


__________________
~ Mindy, SPS addict.

Current Tank Info: 69 SPS (73 gal net) established July 1/15. (HBD Canada!) ATB 840, ATI 6-bulb dimmable. Fauna Marin balling lite method.

Last edited by Myka; 07/20/2011 at 08:14 PM.
Myka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/20/2011, 08:11 PM   #12
dustinc
Registered Member
 
dustinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Waxahachie, TX
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myka View Post
Could you guys please state which skimmers you have used in the past? Reviews are always relative! =]

I'm considering the Skims Kone SK181 for my ~100 reef. I have a EuroReef RS-180 on there right now that I'm not happy with (really noisy and likes to overflow). I have a SWC Cone on my nano that I really like, and the Skims is a really similar design.
Ive use Deltec APH525, SWC 160 Cone, SWC 120 Cone, SRO 1000SSS, just to name a few. The Skimz is my favorite skimmer I've ever owned.


__________________
You might be too strong to surrender boy, but you're far too frail to fight!

Current Tank Info: 120 Planet
dustinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/20/2011, 08:23 PM   #13
Myka
Reefing since '93
 
Myka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 2,436
Thanks! I am comparing the Skimz Kone to the SWC Cone trying to decide which to buy...wondering if the price difference is worth it on similarly designed skimmers?


__________________
~ Mindy, SPS addict.

Current Tank Info: 69 SPS (73 gal net) established July 1/15. (HBD Canada!) ATB 840, ATI 6-bulb dimmable. Fauna Marin balling lite method.
Myka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/20/2011, 09:37 PM   #14
dustinc
Registered Member
 
dustinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Waxahachie, TX
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myka View Post
Thanks! I am comparing the Skimz Kone to the SWC Cone trying to decide which to buy...wondering if the price difference is worth it on similarly designed skimmers?
It is IMO. The acrylic work is much nicer on the Skimz line


__________________
You might be too strong to surrender boy, but you're far too frail to fight!

Current Tank Info: 120 Planet
dustinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/21/2011, 05:49 AM   #15
yeldarbj
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,295
I've used an I-Tech 200 with Tunze hydrofoamer and Tunze 9010 on this tank. I still really like the Skimz. They are about to release a new needle wheel upgrade too.


yeldarbj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/21/2011, 08:10 AM   #16
moonpod
Premium Member
 
moonpod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: B.H., Los Angeles
Posts: 13,053
Different skimz unit but I got the SM252. I like external units and that's where I have gripe with design. The acrylic work I like. Pump seems decent. The outflow and air valves are nice. But the way they "plumbed" the pump wastes a ton of potential contact time IMO. Over half the "tube" is empty. I noted the internal units shouldn't have that issue the way they are designed. Also the external cone looks better in that respect as well


__________________
Excuses are just the nails for the house of failure.

Current Tank Info: 32" Leemar starfire cube now empty and not quite so stinky

Last edited by moonpod; 07/21/2011 at 08:31 AM.
moonpod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/21/2011, 11:05 AM   #17
moonpod
Premium Member
 
moonpod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: B.H., Los Angeles
Posts: 13,053
correction SM202


__________________
Excuses are just the nails for the house of failure.

Current Tank Info: 32" Leemar starfire cube now empty and not quite so stinky
moonpod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/21/2011, 11:09 AM   #18
Mindflux
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeldarbj View Post

With the internal pump, the skimmer has a very small footprint, just over 8" x 8". The pump is very quiet and efficient, rated at only 12w. One unique feature of this skimmer is the output is at the bottom, under the pump. Water exits out a channel in the corner of the base of the skimmer. Here are a couple pictures that show this better.



Don't you mean input is at the bottom? Output should be pushing through the skimmer body to produce bubbles.


Mindflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/21/2011, 11:15 AM   #19
moonpod
Premium Member
 
moonpod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: B.H., Los Angeles
Posts: 13,053
I think he meant the skimmer output not the pump output.


__________________
Excuses are just the nails for the house of failure.

Current Tank Info: 32" Leemar starfire cube now empty and not quite so stinky
moonpod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/23/2011, 11:50 AM   #20
bamf25
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,419
What model of Skimz for a 120g system with a 40 g sump?


bamf25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/23/2011, 11:55 AM   #21
moonpod
Premium Member
 
moonpod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: B.H., Los Angeles
Posts: 13,053
I'm using a sm202 on similar volume


__________________
Excuses are just the nails for the house of failure.

Current Tank Info: 32" Leemar starfire cube now empty and not quite so stinky
moonpod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/23/2011, 12:07 PM   #22
bamf25
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,419
If figure I have about 130g total volume. SO was looking at the sk181, the sm161, the sk201, or the sm201. I know that the sm201 has the largest pump and there were some initial "critisisms" with the es 2800 pump in the sk201. Have these been adressed. I want an effective and QUIET skimmer.


bamf25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/23/2011, 12:08 PM   #23
moonpod
Premium Member
 
moonpod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: B.H., Los Angeles
Posts: 13,053
201 and 202 have same pump right? Just int vs ext? If so my pump pretty damn quiet


__________________
Excuses are just the nails for the house of failure.

Current Tank Info: 32" Leemar starfire cube now empty and not quite so stinky
moonpod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/23/2011, 12:28 PM   #24
bamf25
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonpod View Post
201 and 202 have same pump right? Just int vs ext? If so my pump pretty damn quiet
I believe they both have the es 5000 the odd one in the 201 line is the sk201 with the es 2800 pump, which is also in the sm161. I think the sk181 has the es2000 pump.


bamf25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07/23/2011, 12:57 PM   #25
yeldarbj
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,295
I'd think you'd be fine with either the sm161 or sk181. The sk181 does have the es2000 pump, the sm161 has the es2800. The theory is that the cone design lets you get by with a smaller pump.


yeldarbj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Skimz SK181 Pump problem suta4242 Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment 4 04/20/2011 09:41 PM
Quick Review jwalker314 Aqua Cave 0 11/17/2010 10:03 PM
I need a quick review of this pond pump! PLEASE areucrazy Arizona - Fish & Reef Aquarium Group (FRAG) 4 06/14/2010 08:01 AM
Quick review of multiple 150w DE bulbs I have tried / used. Garage1217 Arizona - Fish & Reef Aquarium Group (FRAG) 4 08/26/2008 01:01 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2025 Axivo Inc.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef CentralTM Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2022
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.